Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/711,445

NETWORK NODE AND USER EQUIPMENT FOR ESTIMATION OF A RADIO PROPAGATION CHANNEL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 17, 2024
Priority
Nov 23, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTEP2021082637
Examiner
LUGO, DAVID B
Art Unit
2631
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
571 granted / 722 resolved
+17.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+1.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
744
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
80.6%
+40.6% vs TC avg
§102
8.7%
-31.3% vs TC avg
§112
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 722 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/8/26 has been entered. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment/Arguments With the amendment filed 6/8/26, entered with the RCE filed 6/26/26, Applicant has amended claims 1, 13, 17 and 20 to recite: “wherein the null space estimate is determined as a function of a channel prediction of the radio propagation channel, where the channel prediction is based on one or more of scheduling delay values, speed of travel of the user equipment, and measurements based on uplink reference signals.” Applicant argues that the cited references fail to teach this limitation. In view of Applicant’s amendment, the claims stand rejected based on the previously cited prior art to Wang et al. (“Wang '061”), Wang et al. (“Wang '831”) and Sahraei et al. in combination with newly cited prior art to Berens et al. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1, 9, 10, 13, 17, 20, 23 and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang et al. U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2020/0092061 (“Wang '061”) in view of Wang et al. U.S Pat. App. Pub. No. 2015/0271831 ( “Wang '831”), Berens et al. U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2004/0151259 and Sahraei et al. U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2021/0359731. Regarding claims 1, 17 and 23, Wang '061 discloses a network node (base station 110) serving a user equipment (i.e. UE 120) over a radio propagation channel (see Fig. 1), the network node comprising a processor 810 (Fig. 8) and a computer readable storage medium (¶ [0020]) to implement a method of estimating the radio propagation channel (¶ [0049]), the method comprising: configuring the user equipment to use single port transmission for transmitting on an uplink data channel to the network node (¶ [0154]); transmitting downlink control information (DCI) towards the UE, wherein the downlink control information indicates which port the UE is to use for transmission of demodulation reference signals (DMRS) on the uplink data channel, as DCI is used to schedule uplink data transmission on a terminal side, and a single antenna port is a resource used for uplink DMRS (¶¶ [0051], [0070], [0154]); receiving uplink reference signals from the UE and uplink data and the DMRS on the uplink data channel from the UE (¶ [0051], [0070], [0154], [0198]); and determining a channel estimate of the radio propagation channel from the received uplink reference signals and the received DMRS (¶¶ [0049], [0380]). Wang '061 does not expressly show that a null space estimate is determined from the uplink reference signals and the received DMRS. Wang '831 discloses that a null space estimate is determined based on received reference signals/DMRS (¶ [0041]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to estimate a null space matrix from uplink DMRS/reference signals, as suggested by Wang '831, in the method/network node of Wang '061, in order to help eliminate interference (see Wang '831, ¶ [0041]). Further, Wang '061 does not expressly disclose that the null space estimate is determined as a function of a channel prediction of the radio propagation environment, where the channel prediction is based on one or more of scheduling delay values, speed of travel of the user equipment, and measurements on uplink reference signals. Sahraei discloses that a null space matrix may be determined based on an estimated channel matrix (¶¶ [0173]-[0174]), and Berens discloses that prediction of conditions of channel state estimation may be made based on speed of a mobile terminal (¶ [0033]). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to determine a null space matrix based on a channel matrix as taught by Sahraei, where the channel state information may be a prediction based on a speed of a mobile terminal, as suggested by Berens, in the method/network node of Wang '061 and Wang '831, to improve the channel estimation process based on expected changes in the channel. Regarding claim 9, Sahraei further discloses transmitting a downlink signal by applying precoder weights (¶ [0085]) to downlink signals (see Figs. 3-4), applying amplitude clipping to the downlink signal, yielding an in-band error signal (¶ [0048]), and transmitting the downlink signal, where one skilled in the art would recognize that the in-band error signal would be projected into a null space along with other portions of the space. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to apply precoding and transmission of precoded signals, as suggested by Sahraei, in the method of Wang '061 in the proposed combination, as precoding is a known way to provide efficient MIMO communications (see Sahraei, ¶ [0004]). Regarding claim 10, in the proposed combination, Sahraei further discloses that the precoding weights are determined as a function of the channel state information received from the UE, the uplink reference signals, and/or the DMRS (¶ [0085]). Regarding claims 13, 20 and 24, Wang '061 discloses a user equipment (i.e. UE 120) assisting a network node (i.e. base station 110) in estimating a radio propagation channel (see Fig. 1), the UE comprising a processor 810 (Fig. 8) and a computer readable storage medium (¶ [0020]) to implement a method comprising: receiving configuration information from the network node to use single port transmission for transmitting on an uplink data channel to the network node (¶ [0154]); receiving downlink control information (DCI) from the network node, wherein the downlink control information indicates which port the UE is to use for transmission of demodulation reference signals (DMRS) on the uplink data channel, as DCI is used to schedule uplink data transmission on a terminal side, and a single antenna port is a resource used for uplink DMRS (¶¶ [0051], [0070], [0154]); and transmitting uplink reference signals towards the network node and uplink data and the DMRS on the uplink data channel in accordance with the configuration (¶ [0051], [0070], [0154], [0198]), thereby assisting the network node in estimating the radio propagation channel (¶¶ [0049], [0380]). Although, as a matter of claim construction, the following limitation is not considered a requirement for the method of claim 13 or the UE of claim 24 since they describe functions performed at a network node, Wang '061 does not expressly show that a null space estimate is determined from the uplink reference signals and the received DMRS at the network node, where the null space estimate is determined as a function of a channel prediction of the radio propagation environment, where the channel prediction is based on one or more of scheduling delay values, speed of travel of the user equipment, and measurements on uplink reference signals. Wang '831 discloses that a null space estimate is determined based on received reference signals/DMRS by an uplink device (¶ [0041]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to estimate a null space matrix from uplink DMRS/reference signals, as suggested by Wang '831, in the method/UE of Wang '061, in order to help eliminate interference (see Wang '831, ¶ [0041]). Further, Sahraei discloses that a null space matrix may be determined based on an estimated channel matrix (¶¶ [0173]-[0174]), and Berens discloses that prediction of conditions of channel state estimation may be made based on speed of a mobile terminal (¶ [0033]). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to determine a null space matrix based on a channel matrix as taught by Sahraei, where the channel state information may be a prediction based on a speed of a mobile terminal, as suggested by Berens, in the method/UE of Wang '061 and Wang '831, to improve the channel estimation process based on expected changes in the channel. Claims 2, 11, 12 and 14-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang '061 in view of Wang '831, Sahraei et al. and Berens et al., as applied above, and further in view of Shibaike et al. U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2025/0015952. Regarding claim 2, Wang '061 in combination with Wang '831, Sahraei and Berens disclose a method for estimating a radio propagation channel by a network node, as described above, but do not expressly disclose verifying that the user equipment is configurable to selectively switch transmission on the uplink data channel between at least two ports. Shibaike discloses that a UE may report capability information indicated a supported SRS transmission port switching pattern (¶ [0037]), which provides indication that the UE is configurable to selectively switch between transmission ports. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to provide information regarding SRS port switching capability, as suggested by Shibaike, in the method of Wang '061 et al., Wang '831, Sahraei and Berens in order to a establish beam management procedure for subsequent beam usage. Regarding claim 11, Wang '061 in combination with Wang '831, Sahraei and Berens disclose a method for estimating a radio propagation channel by a network node, as described above, but do not expressly disclose configuring the UE to use a first port for transmitting on the uplink data channel to the network node and configuring the UE to use a second port for a next-most in time occurring transmission on the uplink data channel to the network node. Shibaike discloses that a UE may be configured to transmit on a plurality of ports, and configured by a higher layer parameter for a TDD UL/DL configuration for transmissions (¶ [0041]-[0042], [0056], [0070]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to configure a UE to transmit using several ports, as suggested by Shibaike, in the method of Wang '061, Wang '831, Sahraei and Berens to provide antenna diversity. Regarding claim 12, Wang '061 in combination with Wang '831, Sahraei and Berens disclose a method for estimating a radio propagation channel by a network node, as described above, but do not expressly disclose configuring the UE to switch from one port to another port when transmitting uplink data from one transmission to a next transmission. Shibaike discloses a UE configured to switch transmission using a plurality of ports, and configured by a higher layer parameter for a TDD UL/DL transmissions (¶ [0041]-[0042], [0056], [0070]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, for a UE to switch transmission ports, as suggested by Shibaike, in the method of Wang '061, Wang '831, Sahraei and Berens for antenna diversity. Regarding claim 14, Wang '061 in combination with Wang '831, Sahraei and Berens disclose a method for assisting a network node in estimating a radio propagation channel, as described above, but do not disclose verifying to the network node that the UE is configurable to selectively switch transmission on the uplink data channel between at least two ports. Shibaike discloses that a UE may report capability information indicated a supported SRS transmission port switching pattern (¶ [0037]), which provides indication that the UE is configurable to selectively switch between transmission ports. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to provide information regarding SRS port switching capability, as suggested by Shibaike, in the method of Wang '061, Wang '831, Sahraei and Berens, in order to a establish beam management procedure for subsequent beam usage. Regarding claim 15, Wang '061 in combination with Wang '831, Sahraei and Berens disclose a method for estimating a radio propagation channel by a network node, as described above, but do not expressly disclose configuring the UE to use a first port for transmitting on the uplink data channel to the network node and configuring the UE to use a second port for a next-most in time occurring transmission on the uplink data channel to the network node. Shibaike discloses that a UE may be configured to transmit on a plurality of ports, and configured by a higher layer parameter for a TDD UL/DL configuration for transmissions (¶ [0041]-[0042], [0056], [0070]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to configure a UE to transmit using several ports, as suggested by Shibaike, in the method of Wang '061, Wang '831, Sahraei and Berens to provide antenna diversity. Regarding claim 16, Wang '061 in combination with Wang '831, Sahraei and Berens disclose a method for estimating a radio propagation channel by a network node, as described above, but do not expressly disclose configuring the UE to switch from one port to another port when transmitting uplink data from one transmission to a next transmission. Shibaike discloses that a UE may be configured to switch transmission using a plurality of ports, and is configured by a higher layer parameter for a TDD UL/DL transmissions (¶ [0041]-[0042], [0056], [0070]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, for a UE to switch transmission ports, as suggested by Shibaike, in the method of Wang '061, Wang '831, Sahraei and Berens for antenna diversity. Claims 3-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang '061 in view of Wang '831, Sahraei et al. and Berens et al., as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Abdoli et al. U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2023/0155864. Regarding claim 3, Wang '061 in combination with Wang '831, Sahraei and Berens disclose a method for estimating a radio propagation channel by a network node, as described above, where the proposed combination suggests that the null space estimate is a function of a channel prediction of the radio propagation channel as Sahraei discloses that a null space matrix is based on a channel matrix (¶¶ [0173]-[0174]), and Berens teaches predicting the conditions of channel state estimation based on speed of a mobile terminal (¶ [0033]), but the references of the proposed combination do not expressly disclose that the channel prediction is a function of the channel estimate. Abdoli discloses a system employing a null-space dimension characterization where a predicted UL is based on SRS channel estimation (¶¶ [0418]-[0423]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to provide channel prediction from channel estimation, as suggested by Shibaike, in the method of Wang '061 and Wang '831, as deriving a channel prediction from a channel estimate to provide channel information is a known technique for characterizing a channel. Regarding claim 4, in the proposed combination, Sahraei further discloses an equation for estimating a null space as identified in the first term of the equation in paragraph [0107] (see ¶¶ [0097], [0109], where the null matrix K corresponds to: I – H+H). Regarding claim 5, in the proposed combination, Abdoli further discloses that the channel prediction is determined as a function of a weight matrix H with weight values (i.e. coefficients) (see ¶¶ [0173], [0418]). Conclusion The prior art made of record below is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Bai et al. U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2020/0259545 disclose that a base station may predict a future value of a channel quality parameter based on uplink reference signal measurements. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to David B. Lugo whose telephone number is 571-272-3043. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 9-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hannah Wang can be reached at 571-272-9018. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID B LUGO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2631 7/6/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 17, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 31, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 26, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 29, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683842
DEMODULATION
1y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12652199
COMMUNICATION INTERFACE CIRCUIT SUPPORTING COMMUNICATION LINK CHANGE AND METHOD OF OPERATING SAME
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12640968
MODULATOR CIRCUITS
2y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633033
APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR FACILITATING AN INVERSE RAY TRACING TO DETERMINE PROPERTIES OF SIGNALS AND SERVICES
3y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12633968
ESTIMATION OF A RADIO CHANNEL IN PRESENCE OF A CONTROLLABLE SCATTERER
2y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+1.6%)
2y 5m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 722 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month