Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Detailed Action
2. This office action is in response to the filing with the office dated 04/15/2026.
Response to Applicant’s arguments
3. Applicant’s arguments and claim amendments filed with the office on 04/15/2026 have been fully considered and found to be non-persusasive. Applicant’s arguments are directed towards amended claim limitations. Please see the rejection below for Claims 1, 4-10 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huh et al (US 2023/0160967 A1) and in view of Tao et al (CN 103730694 A); Claims 2, 3, 11-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huh et al (US 2023/0160967 A1), Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) and in further view of Anantharaman (US 2007/0047796 A1).
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action.
Claim Rejections – 35 U.S.C. 112
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
(b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention.
4. Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention.
Claim 11 recites “A battery cell weld inspection method using a battery cell weld inspection apparatus………”.
A single claim which claims both an apparatus and the method steps of using the apparatus is indefinite. Ex parte Lyell, 17 USPQ2d 1548 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1990). Such a claim is directed to neither a “process” nor a “machine,” but rather embraces or overlaps two different statutory classes of invention. MPEP § 2173.05(p).
Claims 12- 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112 (b) due to their dependency on claim 11.
Claim Rejections – 35 U.S.C. 103
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows:
1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness.
5. Claims 1, 4-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huh et al (US 2023/0160967 A1) and in view of Tao et al (CN 103730694 A, cited on the IDS dated 06/03/2024, item 7 on foreign patents).
PNG
media_image1.png
354
466
media_image1.png
Greyscale
Regarding independent claim 1, Huh et al (US 2023/0160967 A1) teaches, A battery cell weld inspection apparatus comprising (figures 1-12, paragraph [0011]): a plate configured to allow a battery cell cassette having a plurality of battery cells disposed therein to be mounted thereon (cell support 230, 320, 420, 520 as shown in figures 2-5); an orthogonal robot (element 620, figure 6, paragraph [0062]) configured to move above the battery cell cassette fixed to the plate figure 6, paragraph [0062]); mark a defective battery cell among the plurality of battery cells ([0051] Defect selection unit 190 may select some defective secondary battery cells among the plurality of secondary battery cells and may transfer non-defective secondary battery cells to cell loader 117 of cell supply and retrieval unit 110. In some examples, defect selection unit 190 may include a cell transferer 192 and a magazine set 194 including a plurality of magazines #1, #2,..., #k (k is a natural number). Each of the plurality of magazines #1, #2,..., #k of magazine set 194 may store one or more secondary battery cells. Cell transferer 192 may identify each of the plurality of secondary battery cells that have passed
PNG
media_image2.png
427
619
media_image2.png
Greyscale
through the inspection unit 130, 140, 150, 160, 170 and 180 and may select some defective secondary battery cells among the identified plurality of secondary battery cells. Cell transferer 192 may transfer the selected secondary battery cells to a corresponding magazine of magazine set 194 and store them. In some examples, cell transferer 192 may identify the type of a defect of a secondary battery cell and may transfer the secondary battery cell to a predetermined magazine corresponding to the type of the defect. A specific embodiment of defect selection unit 190 will be described in more detail with reference to FIG. 11. [0054] data processing unit 124 may determine whether a secondary battery cell is defective based on the data measured from thickness measurement unit 130, OCV/IR measurement unit 142, insulation voltage measurement unit 144 and insulation resistance measurement unit 146 of electrical characteristic measurement unit 140, mass measurement unit 170 and tab inspection unit 180. In this example, cell transferer 192 may identify a secondary battery cell and may determine whether the identified secondary battery cell is defective by obtaining a defect determination result made by data processing unit 124. [0056] As described above, inspection system 100 according to the present disclosure can perform various inspections, print inspection data and discharge defective cells in line and can adjust the throughput depending on operation cycle. Therefore, inspection system 100 can improve the inspection efficiency of secondary batteries); and an alignment unit configured to align a position of the battery cell cassette such that the battery cell cassette is disposed in an operation zone of the orthogonal robot (figure 6, paragraph [0062]).
Huh et al does not explicitly teach a laser pointer coupled to the orthogonal robot, the laser pointer being configured to mark a defective battery cell.
Huh et al further teaches, an alignment unit configured to align a position of the battery cell cassette and wherein the alignment unit is located between the plate and the laser pointer with respect to a first direction (data printer 600 may include a main body 610, an orthogonal robot 620, a marking controller 630 and a multi-head marking printer 640. Main body 610 may include a frame capable of supporting the other components 620 to 640 of data printer 600. Orthogonal robot 620 may move multi-head marking printer 640 under the control of marking controller 630. Marking controller 630 may control an operation of orthogonal robot 620 and an operation of multi-head marking printer 640, and may be provided in a non-illustrated frame or fixed element (paragraph [0062]).
Huh et al does not teach a laser pointer.
PNG
media_image3.png
519
470
media_image3.png
Greyscale
Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) teaches ([0031] the marking assembly 400 includes a marking mechanical arm 4 and marking 5, the marking mechanical arm grabbing and lifting the battery 4 from a conveying device I, the cell marking by marking 5. after marking the manipulator 4 placing the battery return conveying device 1, as a preferable mode, marking mechanical arm 4 only battery in the guide groove so as to marking the detection unqualified battery, after marking, marking mechanical arm 4 back to the battery conveying device I, the battery conveying tail end of the conveying device I and stored. [0032] This invention claims the lithium battery welding detection mark in the transmission device I is provided with a plurality of guide grooves 100 adjacent to the conveying device I and orderly provided with a welding component 200 along the conveying direction of the conveyer device I, detection component 300 and the marking assembly 400, the welding assembly 200 comprises a rotary clamp (6), a welding mechanical hand 2 and a welding arm 8, the end of the welding arm 8 with a welding head 9, the detection assembly 300 comprises a rotating plate 15 and a mechanical arm for detecting 3. the rotary table (201) is orderly provided with feeding stations spaced at a 90 degree angle 10, airtight testing station, a short circuit test station and blanking station 13, the marking assembly 400 includes a marking mechanical arm 4 and marker 5. lithium battery welding detection mark of the structure, adopts the full automatic operation, the welding is finished at one time cell, air tightness test and short circuit test, laser marking, and the unqualified product eliminating procedure, so as to improve the production efficiency and guarantee the stability of the quality and reduce the labour intensity).
Therefore it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the teachings of Huh et al by providing a laser pointer/marking assembly as taught by Tao et al.
One of the ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make such a modification so that the defective battery cell can be marked by the laser pointer as taught by Tao et al (paragraph [0031], [0032]).
Regarding dependent claim 4, Huh et al (US 2023/0160967 A1) and Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) teach, the battery cell weld inspection apparatus according to claim 1.
Huh et al further teaches, further comprising: a lift configured to adjust a height of the plate, wherein the lift is located under the plate (as shown in figure 2, paragraph [0057] and applicable to figure 6).
Regarding dependent claim 5, Huh et al (US 2023/0160967 A1) and Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) teach, the battery cell weld inspection apparatus according to claim 1.
Huh et al further teaches, wherein the battery cell cassette comprises four corner portions, each of which is formed as a result of two side surfaces being joined to each other, and wherein the alignment unit aligns the battery cell cassette while moving so as to be closer to or farther away from the four corner portions (figure 8 and 9, paragraphs [0064]-[0067]).
Regarding dependent claim 6, Huh et al (US 2023/0160967 A1) and Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) teach, the battery cell weld inspection apparatus according to claim 1.
Huh et al further teaches, wherein the plate comprises a coupling portion configured to fix the position of the battery cell cassette (figure 8 and 9, paragraphs [0064]-[0067]).
Regarding dependent claim 7, Huh et al (US 2023/0160967 A1) and Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) teach, the battery cell weld inspection apparatus according to claim 1.
Huh et al further teaches, further comprising; a count display unit configured to display a number of defective battery cells including the defective battery cell (paragraph [0051])
Regarding dependent claim 8, Huh et al (US 2023/0160967 A1) and Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) teach, the battery cell weld inspection apparatus according to claim 1.
Huh et al further teaches, further comprising; a manual inspector configured to enable an operator to manually inspect a weld of the defective battery cell marked by the laser pointer (paragraph [0059], figure 3).
Regarding dependent claim 9, Huh et al (US 2023/0160967 A1) and Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) teach, the battery cell weld inspection apparatus according to claim 8.
Huh et al further teaches, wherein the manual inspector comprises: a push-pull jig configured to pull a wire of the weld of the defective battery cell; and an alarm unit configured to generate an alarm when a force with which the push-pull jig pulls the wire reaches a set level (paragraph [0059], figure 3).
Regarding dependent claim 10, Huh et al (US 2023/0160967 A1) and Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) teach, the battery cell weld inspection apparatus according to claim 7.
Huh et al further teaches, wherein the number displayed on the count display unit is decreased whenever an operator checks a weld of the defective battery cell marked by the laser pointer (paragraph [0051]).
6. Claims 2, 3, 11-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huh et al (US 2023/0160967 A1), Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) and in further view of Anantharaman (US 2007/0047796 A1).
Regarding dependent claim 2, Huh et al (US 2023/0160967 A1) and Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) teach, the battery cell weld inspection apparatus according to claim 1.
Huh et al further teaches, further comprising: a controller configured to receive position information of a weld of the defective battery cell derived from an internal resistance value of the battery cell cassette (paragraphs [0042]-[0045], [0061]).
Huh et al is silent about a result of measurement using a thermal imaging scanner and to control the orthogonal robot based on the received position information.
PNG
media_image4.png
471
584
media_image4.png
Greyscale
Anantharaman (US 2007/0047796 A1) teaches, (A thermal imaging system for a battery module enclosure that includes first and second battery module enclosure components between which a weld is formed includes a thermal imaging camera that focuses on the first and second battery module enclosure components within a predetermined amount of time after the weld is formed and that acquires a thermal signature. A control module includes an image processing module that receives the thermal signature and that locates a predetermined reference point in the thermal signature. An image comparison module receives the thermal signature and uses the predetermined reference point to compare the thermal signature to a template signature in order to verify structural integrity of the weld. The image comparison module computes a relative measure of deviation of the thermal signature from the template signature and identifies the weld as defective when the relative measure of deviation is greater than a predetermined value (abstract, also see paragraphs [0004]-[0006]).
Therefore it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the teachings of Huh et al by providing a laser source and a thermal imaging camera as taught by Anantharaman (paragraphs [0022]-[0025]).
One of the ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make such a modification so that the defective battery cell can be identified through thermal imaging as taught by Anantharaman (paragraph [0022]-[0026], figure 6, [0031]-[0033], [0062]).
Regarding dependent claim 3, Huh et al (US 20230160967 A1) and Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) teach the battery cell weld inspection apparatus according to claim 1.
Anantharaman further teaches, wherein the laser pointer radiates a laser beam to a weld of each of a positive electrode terminal and a negative electrode terminal of the defective battery cell ((paragraph [0022]-[0026], figure 6, [0031]-[0033], [0062]).
Therefore it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the teachings of Huh et al by providing a laser source and a thermal imaging camera as taught by Anantharaman (paragraphs [0022]-[0025]).
One of the ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make such a modification so that the defective battery cell can be identified through thermal imaging as taught by Anantharaman (paragraph [0022]-[0026], figure 6, [0031]-[0033], [0062]).
Regarding independent claim 11, Huh et al (US 20230160967 A1) teaches, Regarding method recitation, please Huh et al (paragraph [0033]).
Please see 35 U.S.C. 112 (b) rejection above regarding the method using the apparatus recitation.
Regarding the limitations, disposing battery cell cassette having a plurality of battery cells mounted therein on the plate; aligning a position of the battery cell cassette using an alignment unit; transmitting position information of a weld of a defective battery cell to an orthogonal robot; marking the weld of the defective battery cell using a laser pointer through a movement of the orthogonal robot, and wherein the alignment unit is located between the plate and the laser pointer with respect to a first direction (please see rejection of claim 1); and pulling the weld of the defective battery cell marked by the laser pointer using a manual inspector for inspection thereof (please see rejection of claims 8 and 9, paragraph [0059], figure 3), wherein the position information of the weld of the defective battery cell is obtained from a result of measurement of an internal resistance of the battery cell cassette and a result of measurement using a thermal imaging scanner performed in advance (please see the rejection of claim 2).
Huh et al is silent about a result of measurement using a thermal imaging scanner and to control the orthogonal robot based on the received position information.
Anantharaman (US 2007/0047796 A1) teaches, (A thermal imaging system for a battery module enclosure that includes first and second battery module enclosure components between which a weld is formed includes a thermal imaging camera that focuses on the first and second battery module enclosure components within a predetermined amount of time after the weld is formed and that acquires a thermal signature. A control module includes an image processing module that receives the thermal signature and that locates a predetermined reference point in
PNG
media_image4.png
471
584
media_image4.png
Greyscale
the thermal signature. An image comparison module receives the thermal signature and uses the predetermined reference point to compare the thermal signature to a template signature in order to verify structural integrity of the weld. The image comparison module computes a relative measure of deviation of the thermal signature from the template signature and identifies the weld as defective when the relative measure of deviation is greater than a predetermined value (abstract, also see paragraphs [0004]-[0006]).
Therefore it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the teachings of Huh et al and Tao et al by providing a laser source and a thermal imaging camera as taught by Anantharaman (paragraphs [0022]-[0025]).
One of the ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make such a modification so that the defective battery cell can be identified through thermal imaging as taught by Anantharaman (paragraph [0022]-[0026], figure 6, [0031]-[0033], [0062]).
Huh et al further teaches, an alignment unit configured to align a position of the battery cell cassette and wherein the alignment unit is located between the plate and the laser pointer with respect to a first direction (data printer 600 may include a main body 610, an orthogonal robot 620, a marking controller 630 and a multi-head marking printer 640. Main body 610 may include a frame capable of supporting the other components 620 to 640 of data printer 600. Orthogonal robot 620 may move multi-head marking printer 640 under the control of marking controller 630. Marking controller 630 may control an operation of orthogonal robot 620 and an operation of multi-head marking printer 640, and may be provided in a non-illustrated frame or fixed element (paragraph [0062]).
Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) teaches a marking assembly (400) which is formed above a transfer device ( 1) provided with batteries and includes a marking robot ( 4) and a marking device (5) for performing marking on batteries which have passed an inspection (see paragraphs [0031] and [0032], and figure 2).
Therefore it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the teachings of Huh et al by providing a laser pointer/marking assembly as taught by Tao et al.
One of the ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make such a modification so that the defective battery cell can be marked by the laser pointer as taught by Tao et al (paragraph [0031], [0032]).
Regarding dependent claim 12, Huh et al (US 20230160967 A1), Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) and Anantharaman (US 2007/0047796 A1) teach, the battery cell weld inspection method according to claim 11.
Huh et al further teaches, wherein upon completion of a manual inspection of a first of a plurality of defective battery cells including the defective battery cell (please see the rejection of claim 2, Huh et al and Anantharaman), a laser beam of the laser pointer marks second defective battery cell (please see the rejection of claim 2, Huh et al, Tao et al and Anantharaman), and wherein, when there is a third defective battery cell after completion of manual inspection of the second defective battery cell (please see the rejection of claim 2, Huh et al, Tao et al and Anantharaman), the laser beam is radiated to the third defective battery cell and the third defective battery cell is manually inspected (please see the rejection of claim 2, Huh et al, Tao et al and Anantharaman).
Therefore it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the teachings of Huh et al by providing a laser source and a thermal imaging camera as taught by Anantharaman (paragraphs [0022]-[0025]).
One of the ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make such a modification so that the defective battery cell can be identified through thermal imaging as taught by Anantharaman (paragraph [0022]-[0026], figure 6, [0031]-[0033], [0062]).
Regarding dependent claim 13, Huh et al (US 20230160967 A1), Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) and Anantharaman (US 2007/0047796 A1) teach, the battery cell weld inspection method according to claim 11.
Huh et al further teaches, wherein a number of defective battery cells including the defective battery cell is displayed on a count display unit as figures (please see paragraphs [0051] and [0059]), wherein the number on the count display unit decreases by one whenever a wire of the weld of the defective battery cell is pulled in the(please see paragraphs [0051] and [0059]), and wherein an operator pulls wires of welds of all defective battery cells to inspect the welds until the number displayed on the count display unit reaches zero (please see paragraphs [0051] and [0059]).
Therefore it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the teachings of Huh et al and Anantharaman by providing for counting the number of defective cells based on the wire pull of the welded battery cell connection.
One of the ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make such a modification since Huh et al teaches identifying and separating out number of defective cells (paragraph [0051], [0059]).
Regarding dependent claim 14, Huh et al (US 20230160967 A1), Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) and Anantharaman (US 2007/0047796 A1) teach, the battery cell weld inspection method according to claim 11.
Huh et al further teaches,, wherein the pulling of the weld using the manual inspector is performed through a process of pulling a wire of the weld of the defective battery cell until the manual inspector generates an alarm (paragraphs [0051], [0059]).
Regarding dependent claim 15, Huh et al (US 20230160967 A1) Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) and Anantharaman (US 2007/0047796 A1) teach, the battery cell weld inspection apparatus according to claim 3.
Huh et al further teaches, wherein the positive electrode terminal and the negative electrode terminal of the defective battery cell are on a same side of the defective battery cell (Figure 12, paragraph [0035]).
Regarding dependent claim 16, Huh et al (US 20230160967 A1), Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) and Anantharaman (US 2007/0047796 A1) teach, the battery cell weld inspection apparatus according to claim 1.
Huh et al further teaches, wherein the alignment unit includes a guide at a lower end, the guide including concave recesses into which corner portions of the battery cell cassette are inserted (figures 8 and 9, paragraphs [0064]-[0067]).
PNG
media_image2.png
427
619
media_image2.png
Greyscale
Regarding independent claim 17, Huh et al (US 20230160967 A1) teaches, A battery cell weld inspection apparatus (figures 1-12, paragraph [0011]) comprising: a plate configured to receive a battery cell cassette having a plurality of battery cells disposed therein (cell support 230, 320, 420, 520 as shown in figures 2-5); a robot (element 620, figure 6,
PNG
media_image1.png
354
466
media_image1.png
Greyscale
paragraph [0062]); and a controller configured to: receive position information of a defective battery cell derived from an internal resistance value of the battery cell cassette (paragraphs [0042]-[0045], [0061]).
Huh et al is silent about a laser pointer, move the laser pointer over the battery cell cassette and a result of measurement using a thermal imaging scanner; control the robot to move the laser pointer to a position of the defective battery cell based on the received position information; and control the laser pointer to emit a laser beam onto the defective battery cell.
PNG
media_image4.png
471
584
media_image4.png
Greyscale
Anantharaman (US 2007/0047796 A1) teaches, (A thermal imaging system for a battery module enclosure that includes first and second battery module enclosure components between which a weld is formed includes a thermal imaging camera that focuses on the first and second battery module enclosure components within a predetermined amount of time after the weld is formed and that acquires a thermal signature. A control module includes an image processing module that receives the thermal signature and that locates a predetermined reference point in the thermal signature. An image comparison module receives the thermal signature and uses the predetermined reference point to compare the thermal signature to a template signature in order to verify structural integrity of the weld. The image comparison module computes a relative measure of deviation of the thermal signature from the template signature and identifies the weld as defective when the relative measure of deviation is greater than a predetermined value (abstract, also see paragraphs [0004]-[0006]).
Therefore it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the teachings of Huh et al by providing a laser source and a thermal imaging camera as taught by Anantharaman (paragraphs [0022]-[0025]).
One of the ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make such a modification so that the defective battery cell can be identified through thermal imaging as taught by Anantharaman (paragraph [0022]-[0026], figure 6, [0031]-[0033], [0062]).
Huh et al does not explicitly teach a laser pointer coupled to the orthogonal robot, the laser pointer being configured to mark a defective battery cell.
Huh et al further teaches, an alignment unit configured to align a position of the battery cell cassette and wherein the alignment unit is located between the plate and the laser pointer with respect to a first direction (data printer 600 may include a main body 610, an orthogonal robot 620, a marking controller 630 and a multi-head marking printer 640. Main body 610 may include a frame capable of supporting the other components 620 to 640 of data printer 600. Orthogonal robot 620 may move multi-head marking printer 640 under the control of marking controller 630. Marking controller 630 may control an operation of orthogonal robot 620 and an operation of multi-head marking printer 640, and may be provided in a non-illustrated frame or fixed element (paragraph [0062]).
Huh et al does not teach a laser pointer.
PNG
media_image3.png
519
470
media_image3.png
Greyscale
Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) teaches ([0031] the marking assembly 400 includes a marking mechanical arm 4 and marking 5, the marking mechanical arm grabbing and lifting the battery 4 from a conveying device I, the cell marking by marking 5. after marking the manipulator 4 placing the battery return conveying device 1, as a preferable mode, marking mechanical arm 4 only battery in the guide groove so as to marking the detection unqualified battery, after marking, marking mechanical arm 4 back to the battery conveying device I, the battery conveying tail end of the conveying device I and stored. [0032] This invention claims the lithium battery welding detection mark in the transmission device I is provided with a plurality of guide grooves 100 adjacent to the conveying device I and orderly provided with a welding component 200 along the conveying direction of the conveyer device I, detection component 300 and the marking assembly 400, the welding assembly 200 comprises a rotary clamp (6), a welding mechanical hand 2 and a welding arm 8, the end of the welding arm 8 with a welding head 9, the detection assembly 300 comprises a rotating plate 15 and a mechanical arm for detecting 3. the rotary table (201) is orderly provided with feeding stations spaced at a 90 degree angle 10, airtight testing station, a short circuit test station and blanking station 13, the marking assembly 400 includes a marking mechanical arm 4 and marker 5. lithium battery welding detection mark of the structure, adopts the full automatic operation, the welding is finished at one time cell, air tightness test and short circuit test, laser marking, and the unqualified product eliminating procedure, so as to improve the production efficiency and guarantee the stability of the quality and reduce the labour intensity).
Therefore it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the teachings of Huh et al by providing a laser pointer/marking assembly as taught by Tao et al.
One of the ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make such a modification so that the defective battery cell can be marked by the laser pointer as taught by Tao et al (paragraph [0031], [0032]).
Regarding dependent claim 18, Huh et al (US 20230160967 A1), Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) and Anantharaman (US 2007/0047796 A1) teach the battery cell weld inspector apparatus according to claim 17.
Huh et al further teaches, wherein the positive electrode terminal and the negative electrode terminal of the defective battery cell are on a same side of the defective battery cell (Figure 12, paragraph [0035]).
Huh et al is silent about, wherein the laser pointer irradiates the laser beam to a weld of each of a positive electrode terminal and a negative electrode terminal of the defective battery cell.
Anantharaman further teaches, wherein the laser pointer radiates a laser beam to a weld of each of a positive electrode terminal and a negative electrode terminal of the defective battery cell (paragraph [0022]-[0026], figure 6, [0031]-[0033], [0062]).
Therefore it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the teachings of Huh et al and Tao et al by providing a laser source and a thermal imaging camera as taught by Anantharaman (paragraphs [0022]-[0025]).
One of the ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make such a modification so that the defective battery cell can be identified through thermal imaging as taught by Anantharaman (paragraph [0022]-[0026], figure 6, [0031]-[0033], [0062]).
Regarding dependent claim 19, Huh et al (US 20230160967 A1), Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) and Anantharaman (US 2007/0047796 A1) teach the battery cell weld inspector apparatus according to claim 17.
Huh et al further teaches, further comprising: a count display unit configured to display a number of defective battery cells including the defective battery cell that are determined to be defective based on the internal resistance value of the battery cell cassette (paragraphs [0042]-[0045], [0061]) and countdown the number based on each of the defective battery cells being inspected ([0061]).
Huh et al is silent on using the thermal imaging scanner.
PNG
media_image4.png
471
584
media_image4.png
Greyscale
Anantharaman (US 2007/0047796 A1) teaches, (A thermal imaging system for a battery module enclosure that includes first and second battery module enclosure components between which a weld is formed includes a thermal imaging camera that focuses on the first and second battery module enclosure components within a predetermined amount of time after the weld is formed and that acquires a thermal signature. A control module includes an image processing module that receives the thermal signature and that locates a predetermined reference point in the thermal signature. An image comparison module receives the thermal signature and uses the predetermined reference point to compare the thermal signature to a template signature in order to verify structural integrity of the weld. The image comparison module computes a relative measure of deviation of the thermal signature from the template signature and identifies the weld as defective when the relative measure of deviation is greater than a predetermined value (abstract, also see paragraphs [0004]-[0006]).
Therefore it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the teachings of Huh et al and Tao et al by providing a laser source and a thermal imaging camera as taught by Anantharaman (paragraphs [0022]-[0025]).
One of the ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make such a modification so that the defective battery cell can be identified through thermal imaging as taught by Anantharaman (paragraph [0022]-[0026], figure 6, [0031]-[0033], [0062]).
Regarding dependent claim 20, Huh et al (US 20230160967 A1), Tao et al (CN 103730694 A) and Anantharaman (US 2007/0047796 A1) teach the battery cell weld inspector apparatus according to claim 17.
Huh et al further teaches, further comprising: a push-pull jig configured to pull a wire of a weld of the defective battery cell; and an alarm unit configured to generate an alarm when a force with which the push-pull jig pulls the wire reaches a set level (paragraph [0051], [0059]).
Therefore it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the teachings of Huh et al and Tao et al and Anantharaman by providing for counting the number of defective cells based on the wire pull of the welded battery cell connection.
One of the ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make such a modification since Huh et al teaches identifying and separating out number of defective cells (paragraph [0051], [0059]).
Conclusion
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SURESH RAJAPUTRA whose telephone number is (571) 270-0477. The examiner can normally be reached between 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, EMAN ALKAFAWI can be reached on 571-272-4448. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/SURESH K RAJAPUTRA/Examiner, Art Unit 2858
/EMAN A ALKAFAWI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2858 6/30/2026
Prosecution Insights