Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/717,327

Network Node, User Equipment and Methods Performed Therein

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 06, 2024
Priority
Feb 02, 2022 — provisional 63/267,477 +1 more
Examiner
SHARMA, GAUTAM
Art Unit
2467
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
570 granted / 650 resolved
+29.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
670
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
86.2%
+46.2% vs TC avg
§102
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
§112
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 650 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 13-32 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 13, 14, 17, 19-24, 27 and 29-32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huawei et al, application no. CN107231332 (English Translation Attached, Art submitted in IDS), hereinafter known a Huawei in view of Abe et al, application no. 2019/0141521, hereinafter known as Abe. As to claim 13, Huawei discloses a method, performed by a network node, the method comprising: handling registration of a User Equipment (UE) to an Internet Protocol Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) network in a communication network (Huawei, figure 2, step 201, re-registration received for UE in IMS when switching between LTE and WiFi). Huawei does not expressly disclose switching of PLMN however Abe discloses wherein the UE is performing a handover from a first public land mobile network (PLMN) of a first country or operator to a second PLMN of a second country or operator (Abe, [0003]-[0009], changing PLMN network by UE when it visits a different a network and performs a registration process accordingly). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Huawei to include the limitations of wherein the UE is performing a handover from a first public land mobile network (PLMN) of a first country or operator to a second PLMN of a second country or operator as taught by Abe. Switching to a different PLMN when changing location by UE is known in the art and it enables UE to communicate in the network without issues. As to claim 14, Huawei discloses wherein the handling of the registration comprises enforcing the UE to make a session initiation protocol (SIP) registration, the IMS system being capable of switching off a SIP encryption policy immediately after the UE has switched networks (Huawei, Figure 3, paragraph 48-60, changing network and ending one SIP policy and beginning another). Huawei does not disclose however Abe discloses ending SIP policy when entered the second PLMN (Abe, [0003]-[0009], roaming from HPLMN to VPLMN where second a SIP session is needed; [0036]-[0038], SIP registration message where encryption is set to NULL when SIP session is started). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Huawei to include the limitations of ending SIP policy when entered the second PLMN as taught by Abe. New or second PMLN invariably require new SIP policy as well known in the art. As to claim 17, Huawei and Abe disclose the method of claim 13. Huawei does not disclose however Abe discloses further comprising responding to a SIP invite from the UE or a Serving Call Session Control Function (S-CSCF) with an error message in response to detecting that the UE has changed to the second PLMN (Abe, [0050]-[0054], deleting bearers during IMS registration for prohibited access and providing response). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Huawei to include the limitations of further comprising responding to a SIP invite from the UE or a Serving Call Session Control Function (S-CSCF) with an error message in response to detecting that the UE has changed to the second PLMN as taught by Abe. Error message would indicate to the UE of a change in communication metrics and environment requiring mitigating steps to continue service. As to claim 19, Huawei and Abe disclose the method of claim 13. Huawei does not disclose however Abe discloses wherein the network node is of the second PLMN and the method comprises detecting a voice bearer release and disconnecting a PDN connection of the UE with an instruction to the UE to reconnect (Abe, [0050]-[0054], deleting bearers including voice bearer during IMS registration for prohibited access). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Huawei to include the limitations of wherein the network node is of the second PLMN and the method comprises detecting a voice bearer release and disconnecting a PDN connection of the UE with an instruction to the UE to reconnect as taught by Abe. All service would require an interruption, when changing form one PLMN to another, including for voice services. As to claim 20, Huawei discloses further comprising detecting a network change for the UE (Huawei, figure 2, step 201, re-registration received for UE in IMS where re-registration includes network change detection). Huawei does not expressly disclose Abe discloses detecting network change means detecting PMLN change (Abe, [0003]-[0009], changing PLMN network for UE when it visits a different network and performs a registration process in new PMLN). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Huawei to include the limitations of detecting network change means detecting PMLN change as taught by Abe. Detection of PMLN change is useful in determining what kind of services a UE may require or is able to employ in new PMLN. As to claim 21, Huawei dicloses a method, performed by a user equipment (UE), of handling communication of the UE in a communication network, the method comprising: changing network and initiating a session initiation protocol (SIP) re-register (Huawei, figure 2, step 201, re-registration received for UE in IMS when switching between LTE and WiFi). Huawei does not expressly disclose switching of PLMN however Abe discloses obtaining an indication that the UE is performing a handover from a first public land mobile network (PLMN) of a first country or operator to a second PLMN of a second country or operator (Abe, [0003]-[0009], changing PLMN network by UE, as indicated by the network, when it visits a different network and performing a registration process) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Huawei to include the limitations of obtaining an indication that the UE is performing a handover from a first public land mobile network (PLMN) of a first country or operator to a second PLMN of a second country or operator as taught by Abe. Switching to a different PLMN when changing location by UE is known in the art and it enables UE to communicate in the network without issues. As to claim 22, Huawei and Abe disclose the method of claim 21. Huawei does not disclose however Abe discloses wherein obtaining the indication comprises determining that the UE is performing the handover or receiving the indication from a network node (Abe, [0003]-[0009], changing PLMN network by UE, as indicated by the network, when it visits a different network and performs a registration process) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Huawei to include the limitations of wherein obtaining the indication comprises determining that the UE is performing the handover or receiving the indication from a network node as taught by Abe. Switching to a different PLMN when changing location by UE is known in the art and it enables UE to communicate in the network without issues. As to claims 23, 24, 27, 29 and 30, the claims are rejected as applied to claims 13, 14, 17, 19 and 20 respectively above by Huawei in view of Abe. As to claims 31-32, the claims are rejected as applied to claims 21-22 respectively above by Huawei in view of Abe. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 15, 16, 18, 25, 26 and 28 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GAUTAM SHARMA whose telephone number is (571)270-7182. The examiner can normally be reached 11am-8pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hassan Phillips can be reached at 571-272-3940. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GAUTAM SHARMA/ Examiner, Art Unit 2467 /HASSAN A PHILLIPS/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2467
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12666392
METHOD TO REDUCE POWER CONSUMPTION IN DUAL RECEIVE MUSIM DEVICES
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12648041
Special Cell Dormancy for New Radio
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12641660
DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD, DATA TRANSMISSION APPARATUS, PROCESSOR, AND MOBILE TERMINAL
1y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12634066
REFERENCE SIGNAL PHASE TIME DRIFT MODEL REPORTING FOR REFERENCE SIGNAL TIME-DOMAIN COHERENCY IN NEW RADIO
3y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628219
DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR MULTI-LINK (ML) RECONFIGURATION
4y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+12.0%)
2y 6m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 650 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month