Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/717,799

SUBSTRATE STRUCTURE FOR TRANSCRIPTION OF SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE FOR PIXEL, AND DISPLAY DEVICE COMPRISING SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 07, 2024
Priority
Dec 08, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0175097 +2 more
Examiner
BODNAR, JOHN A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
496 granted / 596 resolved
+23.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
622
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
48.7%
+8.7% vs TC avg
§102
22.2%
-17.8% vs TC avg
§112
25.6%
-14.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 596 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION This application, 18/416151, attorney docket AD9667-US, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This application is assigned to LG ELECTRONICS INC.. and is a National Stage entry of PCT/KR2022/019935, which claims foreign priority to 10-2021-0175097, filed 12/08/2021 and to 10-2022-0170239, filed 12/08/2022 Claims 1-20 are pending and are considered below. Claim Objections Claim 13 is objected to because of the following informalities: The claim ends with a semicolon. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claim 1 recites, “transferring a semiconductor light emitting device for pixel” this sentence fragment is unclear. It appears to lack antecedent for a pixel. It is not clear if the substrate receives the LED or contributes the LED to another substrate. Claim 1 recites “into which a predetermined semiconductor light emitting device is assembled" It is not clear if a light emitting device is claimed or just the assembly hole. Claim 2 and 14 recite, “far from the substrate” The term “far from” is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “far from” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Claim 2 and 14 recite, “depending on the height from the substrate.” It is not clear how this limits the device. Claim 13 recites, “a substrate structure for transferring a pixel semiconductor light emitting device of claim 1.” It is unclear what element the substrate structure is. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: As for claim 1, The prior art does not teach or make obvious a substrate structure for receiving a semiconductor light emitting device that includes a plurality of assembly wirings and a partition wall disposed with an LED receiving hole, wherein the partition wall comprises a porous structure. Claims 2-20 depend on claim 1 and include the same novel features. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. U.S> 2007/0249140 to Dross teaches using a porous layer to reduce stress bending, but the prior art does not teach using a porous layer an LED display substrate that has LED receiving holes. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN A BODNAR whose telephone number is (571)272-4660. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th and every other Friday 7:30-5:30 Central time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yara Green can be reached at 571-270-3035. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN A BODNAR/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 07, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745682
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12727218
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12721128
STANDARD CELL LAYOUT ARCHITECTURES AND DRAWING STYLES FOR 5NM AND BEYOND
4y 8m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12713803
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12707652
CAPACITOR AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 7m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 596 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month