Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/720,648

SELF-CALIBRATION METHOD AND SELF-CALIBRATION OF MEASURING DEVICES

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 16, 2024
Priority
Dec 21, 2021 — DE 10 2021 214 808.5 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, TAN D
Art Unit
3629
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Siemens Energy AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
24%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 5m
Est. Remaining
43%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 24% of cases
24%
Career Allowance Rate
123 granted / 506 resolved
-27.7% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
5y 10m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
546
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
§103
42.3%
+2.3% vs TC avg
§102
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§112
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 506 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Status Claims 1-14 are pending. They comprise of 1 group: Method1: 1-14. As of 06/16/24, independent claim 1 is as followed: 1. (currently amended) A method for securely capturing data from devices, for purposes of calibration or gaging, comprising: [1] setting up a digitized process sequence in a data chain (DLT), which is created and protected using a distributed ledger technology, [2] registering a device (D) which is configured to output encrypted measurement information, with implemented measuring device properties of the device (D), in the data chain (DLT), [3] gaining access by an inspection authority (I) to the measurement information from the device (D), [4] establishing by the inspection authority (I) an operative connection, which is protected by the data chain (DLT), between the device (D) and a working standard (A), wherein the working standard is provided with identification data such that there is encrypted identification of the working standard and separate, unencrypted identification of the working standard, [5] reading out determined measurement data for the working standard (A) in encrypted form and transmitting to the inspection authority (I) in encrypted form, in the event of successful calibration or gaging of the device, storing by the inspection authority (I) this result in the data chain (DLT). Note: numerals [1]-[5] are added to the beginning of each step. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. 1) In independent claim 1, the preamble calls for “a method for securely capturing data from devices for purposes of calibration or gaging” but there is no discussion of the “calibration or gaging” in the cited 5 steps. feature “compliance” in the claim steps. The last step calls for “adapting execution behavior accordingly” is broad and does not address how the compliance is carried out. 2) In independent claim 1, the abbreviation (DLT) after the term “a data chain” is vague and should be removed. 3) In independent claim 1, it’s not clear the relationship of step [1] “setted digitized process sequence in a data chain” to steps [2]-[5]? 4) In independent claim 1, the abbreviation (I) after the term “an inspection authority” is vague and should be removed. 5) In independent claim 1, step [5], the term “determined measurement data” lack antecedent basis for the term “determined.” Is there a step of “determining of measurement data”? In independent claim 1, step [5], it’s not clear what are being transmitted to the inspection authority? In independent claim 1, step [5], it’s not clear how the “event of successful calibration or gaging of the device” is determined? In independent claim 1, step [5], the term “this result” is vague because it’s not clear how the “this result” is defined and/or came from? Citations of Pertinent Prior Art CN 109.658.097 is cited to teach the block chain system of the authentication management device, a block chain system, but does not cited the specific steps of [4]-[5]. No claims are allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Tan "Dean" D NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-6806. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F: 6;30-4:30 PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sarah M Monfeldt can be reached on 571-270-1833. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TAN D NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3689 1. (currently amended) A method for securely capturing data from devices comprising: [1] setting up a digitized process sequence in a data chain (DLT), which is created and protected using a distributed ledger technology, [2] registering a device (D) which is configured to output encrypted measurement information, with implemented measuring device properties of the device (D), in the data chain (DLT), [3] gaining access by an inspection authority (I) to the measurement information from the device (D), [4] establishing by the inspection authority (I) an operative connection, which is protected by the data chain (DLT), between the device (D) and a working standard (A), wherein the working standard is provided with identification data such that there is encrypted identification of the working standard and separate, unencrypted identification of the working standard, [5] reading out determined measurement data for the working standard (A) in encrypted form and transmitting to the inspection authority (I) in encrypted form, in the event of successful calibration or gaging of the device, storing by the inspection authority (I) this result in the data chain (DLT).
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 16, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12563105
DETECTING CONFIGURATION GAPS IN SYSTEMS HANDLING DATA ACCORDING TO SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS FRAMEWORKS
3y 1m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12499416
SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO ATTRIBUTE AUTOMATED ACTIONS WITHIN A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENT
2y 2m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Patent 12468818
REMEDIATION OF REGULATORY NON-COMPLIANCE
1y 7m to grant Granted Nov 11, 2025
Patent 12441538
LOCAL NODE FOR A WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 14, 2025
Patent 12437272
SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR USING MACHINE LEARNING TO MAKE INTELLIGENT RECYCLING DECISIONS
1y 8m to grant Granted Oct 07, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
24%
Grant Probability
43%
With Interview (+19.1%)
5y 10m (~3y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 506 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month