Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/722,356

Apparatus for Identifying Object

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 20, 2024
Examiner
MALEVIC, DJURA
Art Unit
2884
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Energy Solution, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
640 granted / 819 resolved
+10.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
857
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
65.5%
+25.5% vs TC avg
§102
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
§112
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 819 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
024Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 09/11/2025, 06/12/2025 and 06/25/2024 were considered by the examiner. The PCT international search report (PCT/KR2022/016842 Translation) filed 06/25/2024 along with Supplementary European Search Report (application EP 22911586) filed 06/12/2025 were both considered, by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 - 3 and 6 – 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by DeWitt et al. (US Pub. No. 2017/0260008 A1). With regards to claim 1, DeWitt discloses an apparatus for identifying an object (O1/O2) (Figures 7, 8, 9B, 10A and 10B) (Abstract) comprising: a light emitter 504 disposed on a first side of a conveyor belt configured to move an identification target object (O1/O2) and configured to emit light toward a second side of the conveyor belt [0126] – [0128], notice how DeWitt teaches that the object (O1/O2) support surface is a moving surface of a conveyor belt [0117], [0120], [0122], [0124], [0136] - [0145]. a reflection part 516 (i.e., mirror) configured to reflect the light emitted by the light emitter to the first side of the conveyor belt (i.e., moving surface, or for example, as the frame of a conventional belt or roller conveyor) [0132] – [0133], [0136], [0138]; a pattern part provided in the identification target object (O1/O2) and configured to form a pattern on the identification target object, through which the light emitted by the reflection part is configured to pass, along a first direction parallel to a moving direction of the identification target object moved by the conveyor belt [0137] – [0140], although DeWitt may not expressly expressly label a separate “pattern part”, the object//packaging regions function as the claimed pattern part because they create a repeatable detection pattern during motion; and a light receiver 506/508 (i.e., photodetectors 506 or the array 5089) disposed on the first side of the conveyor belt and configured to receive the light having passed through (i.e., under BRI by optical energy reaching the receiver after being blocked/transmitted by object regions) the pattern part [0137] – [0139] (i.e., how the light changes over time while the object (O1/O2) moves, as in when the object (O1/O2) moves, based on other parts, the receiver 506/508 sees a signature, as the pattern is laid out in the same direction the object (O1/O2) is traveling, so as the object (O1/O2) moves forward, it “feeds” the receiver 506/508 the pattern in order), wherein the identification target object (O1/O2) includes a first object (O1/O2) and a second object (O1/O2) which are identified differently, and patterns of the pattern parts provided on the first object (O1/O2) and the second object (O1/O2) respectively are different from each other [0139]. Notice how Dewitt differentiates object types by there distinct detect optical signatures and/or characteristics detected/determined [0076], (i.e., Vehicle Control Based on Item Characteristic(s) [0168]). With regards to claim 2, DeWitt discloses the pattern part comprises: a first pattern blocking (i.e., opaque portions) between the light emitter and the transparent/reflection part [0139] – [0139]; and a second pattern forming a path for light movement between the reflection part and the light receiver on the identification target object (O1/O2) [0139] – [0139], wherein the first pattern and the second pattern are alternately arranged (Blocking/non-blocking along the conveying direction) along the first direction [0139] – [0139]. With regards to claim 3, DeWitt discloses the reflection part is configured to reflect light in a direction parallel to a direction in which the light emitted from the light emitter 504 moves, and the second pattern is formed through the identification target object (O1/O2) along the direction in which the light emitted from the light emitter 504 moves [0132] – [01331]. With regards to claim 6, DeWitt discloses a controller configured to recognize a type of the identification target object based on a pattern of light received by the light receiver (Abstract), [0137] – [0140], [0155], [0159], [0161]. With regards to claim 7, DeWitt discloses a sensor 512 (i.e., an integrated emitter/detector assembly 512), configured to emit light with the light emitter 504 and receive light with the light receiver 506/508 [0125], [0140], [0178] – [0187]., wherein the sensor 512 comprises: a plurality of sensors 506/508 spaced a preset distance apart from each other along a longitudinal direction of the conveyor belt [0125], [0140], [0178] – [0187]., and the controller is configured to determine the location of each type of the identification target object (O1/O2) based on a pattern of light received by each of the plurality of sensors 506/508 (Figures 9A, 10B, 13 and 14) [0125], [0140], [0178] – [0187]. With regards to claim 8, DeWitt discloses the conveyor belt is branched into a plurality of paths, and a movement path of an identification target object (O1/O2) is determined by determining positions of sensors 506/508 having received a specific pattern of light among the plurality of sensors 506/508 disposed in the plurality of branched paths respectively (Figures 13 - 14), [0178] – [0187]. Notice how DeWitt uses path network/transport routing rather than branched belt. With regards to claim 9, DeWitt discloses disposing a light emitter 504 configured to emit light toward a second side of a conveyor belt and a light receiver 506/508 configured to receive the light on a first side of a conveyor belt [0126] – [0128], [0137] – [0139]; disposing a reflection part 516 configured to reflect the light, emitted by the light emitter 504 toward the first side of the conveyor belt, on the second side of the conveyor belt [0132] – [0133]; moving an identification target object (O1/O2) provided with a pattern through which the light emitted by the light emitter 504 and reflected by the reflection part 516 passes on the conveyor belt, the pattern is provided along a first direction parallel to a moving direction of the identification target object (O1/O2) moved by the conveyor belt [0139] – [0140]; and determining the location of the identification target object (O1/O2) based on a signal generated when the light receiver 506/508 receives the light reflected by the reflection part 516 [0137] – [0139]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4 and 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DeWitt et al. (US Pub. No. 2017/0260008 A1) in view of Mori (US Pub. No. 2008/0158555 A1). With regards to claim 4, DeWitt discloses the apparatus for identifying the object of claim 1, but fails to expressly disclose an infrared sensor configured to emit an infrared ray with the light emitter and receive the infrared ray with the light receiver. Mori relates to a reflection photoelectric sensor having detection of infrared light and a light receiving element receiving that IR light [0050]. In view of the utility, to improve light robustness and use of standard industrial IR components as needed, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify DeWitt to include the IR capabilities such as that taught by Mori. With regards to claim 5, DeWitt discloses the apparatus for identifying the object of claim 4, but fails to expressly disclose the reflection part comprises; a reflector disposed on the second side of the conveyor belt and configured to reflect the infrared ray emitted by the infrared sensor toward the infrared sensor again. Mori discloses a retro-reflective member returning the detection light towards the sensor [0051] (Figure 6A – 6C) along with teaches that the detection light is IR and as such, employs a reflector/retroreflector to return the IR ray toward the sensor [0049] - [0051] (Abstract). In view of the utility, to improve light robustness and use of standard industrial IR components as needed, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify DeWitt to include the IR capabilities such as that taught by Mori. (Abstract). Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DeWitt et al. (US Pub. No. 2017/0260008 A1) in view of Onayama (US Patent 8,776,982 B2). With regards to claim 10, DeWitt discloses the method of identifying the object of claim 9, and also disclose determining the location of the identification target object [0113], [0114], but fails to expressly disclose data-logging the signal of the light receiver based on time. Onayama teaches capturing/using light -receiver signals with timing information and processing that timing data in a computer. Figure 9 shows timing when the article and the detected plates are detected. Notice that a temporal change of a receiving light amount at the time of detecting the article 16x at the predetermined position P1 and a light receiving amount at the time of detecting the detected plate 60 after the articles 16y, 16x are firstly placed on the slat 18. A positional relationship between the article 16x and the slat 18 and the interval between the articles described above are determined by sending the timing of blocking the light to the computer as described later. This is used for determining whether or not the article 16x can be branched (Col 11, Line 65 to Col. 13, Line 16). FIG. 17 is a view in which a conventional pulse is counted up and the article is branched. Onayama further teaches positional relationships and intervals are determined by sending the timing of clocking the light to the computer and such data are sent to the computer and process creating/displaying table based on the data, see Figure 13(a) and 13(b), (Col. 13, Line 36 to Col. 18, Line 38). In view of the utility, to add a robust tracking and spacing determination process especially given the conveyed items that are the items of interest, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify DeWitt to include the teachings such as that taught by Onayama. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DJURA MALEVIC whose telephone number is (571)272-5975. The examiner can normally be reached M-F (9-5). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Uzma Alam can be reached at 571.272.3995. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DJURA MALEVIC/Examiner, Art Unit 2884 /UZMA ALAM/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2884
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 20, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589258
COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED MEDICAL METHOD OF IRRADIATION (RT) TREATMENT PLANNING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12571729
APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING AND/OR RECEIVING TERAHERTZ RADIATION, AND CONTROL DEVICE THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12553770
METHOD AND APPARATUS CONFIGURED TO COUNT N-PHOTON EVENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12553824
MONITORING CONDITIONS AND HEALTH OF ARTISTIC WORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12553830
FLUORESCENT INK AND IMAGING SYSTEM FOR DEFECT DETECTION ON PRINTED PHOTOSENSITIVE OBJECTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+10.3%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 819 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month