Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/724,290

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PARTITIONING MODELS OF ANATOMICAL STRUCTURES INTO FUNCTIONAL SEGMENTS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 26, 2024
Priority
Dec 31, 2021 — provisional 63/295,700 +1 more
Examiner
POPOVICI, DOV
Art Unit
2681
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Intuitive Surgical Operations Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
491 granted / 567 resolved
+24.6% vs TC avg
Strong +42% interview lift
Without
With
+41.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
4 currently pending
Career history
576
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.0%
-27.0% vs TC avg
§103
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
§102
30.6%
-9.4% vs TC avg
§112
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 567 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 39, 46, 48, 49, 56 and 58 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zhou et al., “Automatic segmentation and recognition of anatomical lung structures from high-resolution chest CT images”, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, July 2006, vol. 30, issue 5, pp 299-313, cited by applicant submitted IDS, dated 07/08/2024. As to claim 39, Zhou et al. discloses a system comprising: a memory (see page 311, 2nd col. at section 4.6, 2nd par. a computer (CPU: AMD Opteron ™ Model 242 or PC cluster, inherently a memory storing instructions must be present for the CPU or PC cluster to execute in the instructions for processing the steps 1-5 in figure 1 at page 301) storing instructions; and a processor (see page 311, 2nd col. at section 4.6, 2nd par. a computer (CPU: AMD Opteron ™ Model 242 or PC cluster) communicatively coupled to the memory (see page 311, 2nd col. at section 4.6, 2nd par. a computer (CPU: AMD Opteron ™ Model 242 or PC cluster, inherently a memory storing instructions must be present for the CPU or PC cluster to execute in the instructions for processing the steps 1-5 in figure 1 at page 301) and configured to execute the instructions to perform a process comprising: determining, based on a set of seeds (see 3.2.1, “seed points”, see 3.4, “seed points”, and see 3.5.2, “We have classified the bronchus and vessels into five lobar groups by the above steps. Based on that information, we divide the whole lung into five lobar regions using a Voronoi division algorithm.”, seeds are inherently and an implicit feature of Voronoi division, i.e., Voronoi diagram divides a plane into regions based on distance to a set of points called seeds, i.e., Voronoi division partitions a plane into regions where each region contains all points closest to a specific seed point, forming Voronoi cells) determined from data representative of a labeled first tubular structure (see figure 1, i.e., “pulmonary vessels”) comprising a blood vessel structure (see page 305, 2nd col. i.e., “blood vessels”) and a labeled second tubular structure (i.e., “Lobar and segmental bronchi, see page 300, 1st col.) comprising an airway vessel structure (see page 300 1st col. at 2 4th par. “bronchial airway”) in a model of at least a portion of an anatomical structure (see figure 1, i.e., “initial region segmentation”) comprising a lung (see figure 1, and see page 300, 1st col. at 2 “Lung”), a partitioning of the model into segments comprising bronchopulmonary segments (see page 312, 1st col. i.e., “lung segments” and see pages 306, 2nd col. through page 307, 1st col., i.e., lobar regions and see figure 1, step 5, “lobar regions”); and outputting data representative of the segments (see figure 1, “output” and see figure 8h, i.e., final lung lobes). As to claim 46, Zhou et al. discloses wherein: the partitioning defines boundaries of the segments; and each labeled tubular branch of the labeled first tubular structure is contained within a respective set of the boundaries of the segments (see page 306, 2nd col. “boundary”, see page 307, 1st col. “boundary”, see page 311, 1st col. and 2nd col., i.e., “lobar boundaries”). As to claim 48, Zhou et al. discloses a method (see figure 1) comprising: determining, by a computing system (see page 311, 2nd col. at section 4.6, 2nd par. a computer (CPU: AMD Opteron ™ Model 242 or PC cluster)) and based on a set of seeds (see 3.2.1, “seed points”, see 3.4, “seed points”, and see 3.5.2, “We have classified the bronchus and vessels into five lobar groups by the above steps. Based on that information, we divide the whole lung into five lobar regions using a Voronoi division algorithm.”, seeds are inherently and an implicit feature of Voronoi division, i.e., Voronoi diagram divides a plane into regions based on distance to a set of points called seeds, i.e., Voronoi division partitions a plane into regions where each region contains all points closest to a specific seed point, forming Voronoi cells) determined from data representative of a labeled first tubular structure (see figure 1, i.e., “pulmonary vessels”) comprising a blood vessel structure (see page 305, 2nd col. i.e., “blood vessels”) in a model of at least a portion of an anatomical structure (see figure 1, i.e., “initial region segmentation”) comprising a lung (see figure 1, and see page 300, 1st col. at 2 “Lung”), a partitioning of the model into segments comprising bronchopulmonary segments (see page 312, 1st col. i.e., “lung segments” and see pages 306, 2nd col. through page 307, 1st col., i.e., lobar regions and see figure 1, step 5, “lobar regions”); and outputting, by the computing system (see page 311, 2nd col. at section 4.6, 2nd par. a computer (CPU: AMD Opteron ™ Model 242 or PC cluster)), data representative of the segments (see figure 1, “output” and see figure 8h, i.e., final lung lobes). As to claim 49, Zhou et al. discloses wherein the set of seeds (see 3.2.1, “seed points”, see 3.4, “seed points”, and see 3.5.2, “We have classified the bronchus and vessels into five lobar groups by the above steps. Based on that information, we divide the whole lung into five lobar regions using a Voronoi division algorithm.”, seeds are inherently and an implicit feature of Voronoi division, i.e., Voronoi diagram divides a plane into regions based on distance to a set of points called seeds, i.e., Voronoi division partitions a plane into regions where each region contains all points closest to a specific seed point, forming Voronoi cells) is determined further based on data representative of an additional labeled tubular structure in the model (see figure 1, i.e., “pulmonary vessels”). As to claim 56, Zhou et al. discloses wherein: the partitioning defines boundaries of the segments; and each labeled tubular branch of the labeled tubular structure is contained within a respective set of the boundaries of the segments (see page 306, 2nd col. “boundary”, see page 307, 1st col. “boundary”, see page 311, 1st col. and 2nd col., i.e., “lobar boundaries”). As to claim 58, Zhou et al. discloses a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions (see page 311, 2nd col. at section 4.6, 2nd par. a computer (CPU: AMD Opteron ™ Model 242 or PC cluster, inherently a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions must be present for the CPU or PC cluster to execute in the instructions for processing the steps 1-5 in figure 1 at page 301) that, when executed, direct a processor (see page 311, 2nd col. at section 4.6, 2nd par. a computer (CPU: AMD Opteron ™ Model 242 or PC cluster) of a computing device to perform a process (see page 311, 2nd col. at section 4.6, 2nd par. a computer (CPU: AMD Opteron ™ Model 242 or PC cluster) comprising: determining, based on a set of seeds (see 3.2.1, “seed points”, see 3.4, “seed points”, and see 3.5.2, “We have classified the bronchus and vessels into five lobar groups by the above steps. Based on that information, we divide the whole lung into five lobar regions using a Voronoi division algorithm.”, seeds are inherently and an implicit feature of Voronoi division, i.e., Voronoi diagram divides a plane into regions based on distance to a set of points called seeds, i.e., Voronoi division partitions a plane into regions where each region contains all points closest to a specific seed point, forming Voronoi cells) determined from data representative of a labeled tubular structure (see figure 1, i.e., “pulmonary vessels”) comprising a blood vessel structure (see page 305, 2nd col. i.e., “blood vessels”) and an additional labeled tubular structure (i.e., “Lobar and segmental bronchi, see page 300, 1st col.) comprising an airway vessel structure (see page 300 1st col. at 2 4th par. “bronchial airway”) in a model of at least a portion of an anatomical structure (see figure 1, i.e., “initial region segmentation”) comprising a lung (see figure 1, and see page 300, 1st col. at 2 “Lung”), a partitioning of the model into segments comprising bronchopulmonary segments (see page 312, 1st col. i.e., “lung segments” and see pages 306, 2nd col. through page 307, 1st col., i.e., lobar regions and see figure 1, step 5, “lobar regions”); and outputting, data representative of the segments (see figure 1, “output” and see figure 8h, i.e., final lung lobes). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 40-45, 47, 50-55 and 57 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 40, the closest prior art of record, namely, Zhou et al. discussed above, does not disclose, teach or suggest, wherein the determining the partitioning comprises: determining a first partitioning based on the set of seeds; adjusting the first partitioning to determine a set of augmented seeds; and determining, based on the set of augmented seeds, a second partitioning of the model into the segments, as recited in claim 40. Claims 41-45 are objected to because claims 41-45 are dependent on objected to claim 40 discussed above. Regarding claim 47, the closest prior art of record, namely, Zhou et al. discussed above, does not disclose, teach or suggest, further comprising: determining a volume of one or more of the segments; and determining, based on the volume, an estimation of function loss based on a removal of one or more of the segments, as claimed in claim 47. Regarding claim 50, the closest prior art of record, namely, Zhou et al. discussed above, does not disclose, teach or suggest, wherein the determining the partitioning comprises: determining a first partitioning based on the set of seeds; adjusting the first partitioning to determine a set of augmented seeds; and determining, based on the set of augmented seeds, a second partitioning of the model into the segments, as recited in claim 50. Claims 51-55 are objected to because claims 51-55 are dependent on objected to claim 50 discussed above. Regarding claim 57, the closest prior art of record, namely, Zhou et al. discussed above, does not disclose, teach or suggest, further comprising: determining, by the computing system, a volume of one or more of the segments; and determining, by the computing system and based on the volume, an estimation of function loss based on a removal of one or more of the segments, as claimed in claim 57. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Buelow et al. (US 8,805,044 B2) teaches a method of identifying at least part of a pulmonary artery tree (402) comprises receiving (102) a bronchial tree structure (500) and receiving (104) a pulmonary vessel structure (400). A pair of a first bronchial segment (602) and a first vessel segment (604) is identified (106), wherein the first bronchial segment and the first vessel segment are adjacent with respect to position and orientation. The first vessel segment is identified (108) as arterial segment of the pulmonary artery tree. A spatial transformation is applied (110) such that the first bronchial segment and the first vessel segment substantially coincide (602'). Respective further vessel segments (606, 608) are identified (112) adjacent to bronchial segments (610, 612), wherein the bronchial segments are comprised in the bronchial tree (see the abstract). NAGATA et al. (US 2020/0242776 A1) teaches a medical image processing apparatus includes: a memory; and a processor configured to execute a process. The process includes: acquiring volume data including one or more organs; and performing processing relating to segment division of the one or more organs. The performing includes: acquiring a first tree structure included in the one or more organs; acquiring a second tree structure included in the one or more organs; and generating a plurality of first segments obtained by dividing the one or more organs based on the first tree structure and the second tree structure. At least a part of a branch of the first tree structure passes through a central portion of the plurality of first segments, and at least a part of a branch of the second tree structure passes along a boundary between the plurality of first segments (see the abstract). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DOV POPOVICI whose telephone number is (571)272-4083. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00 am- 4:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Akwasi M. Sarpong can be reached at 571-270-3438. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DOV POPOVICI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2681
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700088
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF TRABECULAR MESHWORK OR OTHER INTRAOCCULAR ANATOMICAL STRCTURES AND TISSUE TYPES
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12691640
CHEMICAL DELIVERY DEVICES PRODUCED USING HALFTONE SCREENING IN AN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING PROCESS
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12693234
OPTICAL INSPECTION SYSTEM AND OPTICAL INSPECTION METHOD
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12694249
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS FOR CREATING IMAGE FORMING CONDITION
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12688699
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHOD
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+41.7%)
2y 9m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 567 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month