Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/725,018

COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR SOLUBILIZING GLYCOSYLTRANSFERASES

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 27, 2024
Priority
Jan 07, 2022 — provisional 63/297,419 +1 more
Examiner
UNDERDAHL, THANE E
Art Unit
1699
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Columbia University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
325 granted / 553 resolved
-1.2% vs TC avg
Strong +50% interview lift
Without
With
+50.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
597
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§103
40.2%
+0.2% vs TC avg
§102
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
§112
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 553 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Restriction/Election Applicant's response to the species election without traverse filed on 8/14/2026 is acknowledged. However, it appears that claim 1 is allowable so this restriction requirement and election of species are withdrawn since all methods require the allowable features of claim 1. Therefore claim 1-20, 26, 27, 31, 32, 37, 38, and 54 are pending and considered on the merits. Claim Objections Claim 32 is objected to for the indentation bridging “and” with “culturing the host cell or using the cell-free expression system”. This indentation is unnecessary and appears to make two steps when the host cell and cell-free expression systems would be alternatives. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The following two limitations in claim 10 are indefinite: “(i) a single-pass transmembrane protein with C-terminus in cytoplasm (type I transmembrane protein)” and“(ii) a single-pass transmembrane protein with N-terminus in cytoplasm (type II transmembrane protein);”. The definitions of the type I and type II transmembrane proteins are narrower than which terminus is in the cytoplasm. Uniprot defies each as follows: Single-pass type I membrane protein--Protein spanning the membrane once, with its N-terminus on the extracellular side of the membrane and removal of its signal sequence. Single-pass type II membrane protein--Protein spanning the membrane once, with its N-terminus on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane. The transmembrane domain is located close to the N-terminus and it functions as an anchor. Since claim 10(i) limits only “a single-pass transmembrane protein with C-terminus in cytoplasm” and does not mention the location of the N-terminus or the signal sequence, it is unclear what limitations are encompassed by the ‘type I transmembrane protein’. Claim 10(ii) does not mention the transmembrane domain’s proximity to the N-terminus, so it is again unclear what limitations are encompassed by the ‘type II transmembrane protein”. The Applicant may want to choose one of each limitation for this claim to remove this rejection. This is different than the enzyme followed by its abbreviation in claims 11-13 where the enzyme name is written out followed by its abbreviation in parenthesis. The Specification makes it clear these are simply abbreviations for the enzymes and their use is interchangeable. Claim 32 is rejected because it is unclear if the culturing of the host cell is linked to the limitation “under conditions effective to express the tripartite glycosyltransferase fusion protein”. It is understood that this limitation is linked to the cell-free expression system, however with the Claim Objection above, it is unclear if this limitation applies to the host cell. Applicant may wish to write both scenarios independently to clearly indicate these are separate alternatives with their own steps for expressing the protein to remove this rejection. Request for Interview The Examiner believes an interview would be useful in progressing this case since allowable subject matter is present in this invention. The Applicant is encouraged to contact Thane Underdahl at (303) 297-4299 to discuss the claims/claim amendments to place this case in condition for allowance prior to replying to this Office Action. Claims Free of the Art Applicant’s own publication (DeLisa et al., Nature Communications 31(1):62325 (2022) in IDS 8/14/16) published Oct 24, 2022 seems to be the first public disclosure of this invention (see Fig 1a). The closest available prior art appears to be US 8999668. However they do not teach a nucleic acid construct or resulting fusion protein comprising an amphipathic shield domain, a glycosyltransferase and a decoy protein. In response to this office action the applicant should specifically point out the support for any amendments made to the disclosure, including the claims (MPEP 714.02 and 2163.06). CONTACT INFORMATION Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THANE E UNDERDAHL whose telephone number is (303) 297-4299. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Thursday, M-F 8-5 MST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Fereydoun Sajjadi can be reached at (571) 272-3311.The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THANE UNDERDAHL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1699
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 27, 2024
Application Filed
May 01, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12760127
An Auricularia Auricula Polysaccharide, Its Application And Preparation Method Thereof
3y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12760099
MULTIPARTITE SIGNALING PROTEINS AND USES THEREOF
3y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12757903
BIOLOGICAL SEED-COATING AGENT (SCA) INCLUDING FERMENTATION BROTH OBTAINED BASED ON CO-CULTIVATION OF TRICHODERMA AND BACILLUS SEQUENTIALLY INOCULATED, AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12729392
BIOMARKER COMPOSITION FOR PREDICTING PROGNOSIS OF BRAIN DISEASE CAUSED BY MICROPLASTIC EXPOSURE AND METHOD FOR PREDICTING PROGNOSIS USING SAME
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12721347
MICROBIAL FORMULATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF PLANTS AND AGRICULTURAL CROPS AGAINST ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURE AND USE THEREOF
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+50.2%)
3y 8m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 553 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month