Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/727,134

SCREW WITH A HOLE-FORMING TIP

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 08, 2024
Priority
Jan 12, 2022 — DE 10 2022 100 651.4 +1 more
Examiner
DAVIS, CASSANDRA HOPE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Ejot SE & Co. Kg
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
798 granted / 1344 resolved
-0.6% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1381
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
43.7%
+3.7% vs TC avg
§102
29.4%
-10.6% vs TC avg
§112
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1344 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, line 3, the phrase “the bearing area of the shaft” lacks antecedent basis. Regarding claim 1, line 4, the phrase “the screw center axis” lacks antecedent basis. Regarding claim 1, line 9, the phrase “the screw-in direction of rotation” lacks antecedent basis. Regarding claim 1, line 14-15, the phrase “the distance of the intersection curve” lacks antecedent basis. Regarding claim 16, line , the phrase “ the core diameter DK” lacks antecedent basis. Regarding claim 1, line 17, the phrase “the intersection point ” lacks antecedent basis. Regarding claim 1, line 18 , the phrase “the longitudinal direction of the screw ” lacks antecedent basis. Regarding claim 1, line 19 , the phrase “the nearest intersection point ” lacks antecedent basis. Regarding claim 1, line 19, the phrase “the distance DK/2 ” lacks antecedent basis. Regarding claim 1, line 21, the phrase “the tangent (T)” and “the screw shell surface” lacks antecedent basis. Regarding claim 4, the phrase “wherein the tip has a basic shape, in particular a conical basic shape, so that, viewed in cross-section, the edges on the side opposite the contour line are connected in a circle” is indefinite because it is unclear if the narrower limitation after “in particular” is positively claimed. Regarding claim 5, line 3 , the phrase “the direction of the head” and “the head” lacks antecedent basis. Regarding claim 7, line 3 , the phrase “ the head ” lacks antecedent basis. Regarding claim 8, line 2, the phrase “the region of the distance (A2)” lacks antecedent basis. Regarding claim 8, line 3, the phrase “the screw center line” lacks antecedent basis. Regarding claim 9, line 2, the phrase “the distance (A) of the intersection curve” lacks antecedent basis. Regarding claim 9, the phrase “wherein the distance (A) of the intersection curve (S) from the center axis at the end facing the foremost tip is less than or equal to 25%, in particular less than or equal to 15%, in particular less than or equal to 10%, in particular less than or equal to 5 %, of the core diameter DK” is indefinite because it is unclear if the narrower limitation after “in particular” is positively claimed. Regarding claim 10, the following phrases lack antecedent basis: “the distance (A) of the intersection curve” (line 2); The bearing region” (line 3); “the removed material” (line 4); “the outward displacement direction (V)” (line 4-5); and “the direction of the head” (line 5). Regarding claim 11, line 2, the phrase “the area of continuous increase of the distance (A)” lacks antecedent basis. Regarding claim 12, line 3 , the phrase “the radial distance DK/2” lacks antecedent basis. Regarding claim 13, line 2 , the phrase “the distance DK/2” lacks antecedent basis. Regarding claim 13, line 3 , the phrase “ the cylindrical part of the shaft” lacks antecedent basis. Regarding claim 14, line 2 , the phrases “the distance (AK)” (line 2); “the transition of the screw tip” (line 3); and “the point at which the intersection curve (S)’” lack antecedent basis. Regarding claim 14, the phrase “wherein the thread has a pitch (P), and the distance (AK) from the transition of the screw tip into the bearing region to the point at which the intersection curve (S) reaches the distance DK/2 from the center axis (MA) is up to 10 times, in particular up to 8 times, the pitch (P), in particular up to 6 times, in particular up to 2.5 times, in particular approximately 1 times, the thread pitch.” is indefinite because it is unclear if the narrower limitation after “in particular” is positively claimed. Regarding claim 15, line , the phrase “the resulting action ratio of distance (AK)” lacks antecedent basis. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-15 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The closest prior art is DE 202007018179 U1 to Reisser Schraubentechnik. Reisser Schraubentechnik teaches a countersunk screw, in particular a countersunk screw, which is designed and intended for fastening planks to wooden substructures comprising a shaft which has a core diameter and which transitions into a tip, which tip tapers starting from the bearing area of the shaft and which tip terminates at a foremost tip, said foremost tip lying on the screw center axis (MA), which screw has a thread (4) for screwing the screw to a component in a screw-in direction of rotation and the thread (1) extends up to the tip (3). PNG media_image1.png 556 184 media_image1.png Greyscale Reisser Schraubentechnik does not teach a screw center plane is defined and at least two edges are formed at the tip by a recess at least of the tip, wherein a first edge lies in the screw-in direction of rotation and a second edge lies counter to the screw-in direction of rotation, wherein the first edge and the second edge lie on both sides of the screw center plane (ME), wherein the two edges are connected via a surface, wherein the surface has a contour line (K) in its cross-sections, an intersection curve (S) of the screw center plane (ME), which lies between the edges, with the surface is obtained, with the distance (A) of the intersection curve (S) from the screw center axis (MA), as viewed from the foremost tip, increasing at least until this distance corresponds to half the core diameter DK, with the intersection point (Al) of the intersection curve (S), which is DK/4 away from the screw center axis, is a length (L) in the longitudinal direction of the screw away from the nearest intersection point (A2) with the distance DK/2 from the screw center axis, the length (L) being greater than DK/3, wherein over the length (L) in this region an edge angle (alpha), which is defined between the tangent (T) to the screw shell surface on the first edge and the contour line (K), also increases with increasing distance of the intersection curve (S) from the center axis (MA). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The following reference teaches screws: (US-20020168245; US-20130011214; US-20090097941; US-20170122357. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CASSANDRA DAVIS whose telephone number is (571)272-6642. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 AM-4:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Liu can be reached at 571-272-8227. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CASSANDRA DAVIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3631
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12694766
WAITPERSON NOTIFICATION AND FEEDBACK INDICATOR DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686226
THREE-DIMENSIONAL BOUQUET GREETING CARD
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12676085
Elastomeric Card Case Holder Device and Method
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12658078
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12648545
ANIMAL EAR TAG
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+25.8%)
2y 4m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1344 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month