Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/730,591

METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION OF A MATERIAL COMPRISING SILICON NANOWIRES AND COPPER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 19, 2024
Priority
Jan 21, 2022 — EU 22305063.4 +1 more
Examiner
TADAYYON ESLAMI, TABASSOM
Art Unit
1718
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Enwires
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
49%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 49% of resolved cases
49%
Career Allowance Rate
398 granted / 805 resolved
-15.6% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
861
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
62.9%
+22.9% vs TC avg
§102
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
§112
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 805 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 06/10/26 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4, 15, and 17-27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Olga Burchak et al (U. S. Patent Application: 2021/0066710, here after Burchak-2), further in view of Yuan Yao et al (U. S. Patent Application: 2007/0166899, here after Yao). Claims 1-2, and 19 are rejected. Burchak-2 teaches a method for the preparation of composite material comprising at least silicon nanowires and catalyst (copper), comprising at least the following stages: (A) introducing into a chamber of a reactor, in an absence of any medium or solvent, a solid/solid mixture of at least a catalyst(copper) in powder form, a growth support in powder form (silicon particles) [abstract, 0108], a mass ratio copper halide/growth support ranging from 0.02 to 0.5(converting molar ratio we will have mass ratio of 0.0226) [0113], (B) growing silicon nanowires in the chamber of the reactor, from at least one precursor compound of the silicon nanowires selected from a silane compound or a mixture of silane compounds [abstract, 0053], and (C) recovering the product[abstract]. Burchak-2 teaches the catalyst is copper particles but does not teach the catalyst is CuCl2. Yao teaches a method of depositing silicon nanowires on a substrate with CVD, where a copper catalyst is applied by applying CuCl2 in form of solid powder to substrate(silicon) [0028, 0024]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to have a method of Burchak-2 where the catalyst (CuCl2) is introduced to the powder substrate, because it is suitable way to apply CuCl2 on a substrate for growing SiNW's. Burchak-2 teaches the catalyst is at least partially bonded to the surface of at least one silicon particle [0115] which is in fact defines mixing (to bring into close association, Merriam-Webster dictionary), and Yao also teaches bring into close association (mixing the coper halide and the growth support, silicon) in the chamber of reactor [0026]. Claim 3 is rejected. Burchak-2 teaches introducing, into the chamber of the reactor, at least one precursor compound of the silicon nanowires chosen from a silane compound or a mixture of silane compounds, decreasing the dioxygen content in the chamber of the reactor, applying a thermal treatment at a temperature ranging from 350°C to 550°C [0157, 0178, 0034-0035]. Claim 4 is rejected as Burchak-2 teaches the preparation of the composite material is implemented in a fixed-bed reactor [fig. 4]. Claim 15 is rejected as Burchak-2 teaches the growth support is silicon nanoparticles or silicon microparticles [0259]. Claim 17 is rejected as Yao teaches the copper halide (cupric chloride) is used (as raw material) [0028]. Claim 18 is rejected as Yao teaches the copper halide (cupric chloride) is in powder form [0028]. Claim 20 is rejected as Burchak-2 [0028], and Yao [0029] both teach the precursor compound of the silicon nanowires is silane (SiH4). Claim 21 is rejected as Burchak-2 teaches the thermal treatment is performed at a temperature ranging from 350 °C to 550 °C [0035]. Claim 22 is rejected. Burchak-2 teaches the thermal treatment is applied from 1 minute to 5 hours [0183]. Claim 23 is rejected. Burchak-2 is a post-treatment step in order to transform (also) organics resulting from the precursor compound of the silicon nanowires into carbon materials [0211]. Claim 24 is rejected. further comprising an additional step of washing the composite material obtained at the end of step (C) [0036]. Claim 25 is rejected. Burchak-2 teaches introduction, into the reactor, of at least one doping material [0144]. Claim 26 is rejected. Burchak-2 and Yao teach the limitation of claim 1, and Burchak-2 teaches a method of making an electrode including a current collector, covering at least one surface of the current collector with a composition comprising said silicon-copper composite material as an electrode active material [0055, 0236]. Claim 27 is rejected. Burchak-2 and Yao teach limitation of claim 26 and teaches a method of making an energy storage device including a cathode, an anode, and a separator disposed between the cathode and the anode, to make at least one of the electrodes [0324-0325]. Claims 5-6, and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Olga Burchak et al (U. S. Patent Application: 2021/0066710, here after Burchak-2), Yuan Yao et al (U. S. Patent Application: 2007/0166899, here after Yao), further in view of Olga Burchak et al (WO 2021/018598 here after Burchak). Claims 5-6 are rejected. Burchak-2 teaches the growth support is silicon nanoparticles, and not carbonaceous polymer fibers. Burchart teaches a method of making composite material comprising silicon nanowires and catalyst(copper) to be used in making electrode for batteries in a reactor [fig. 1], where support for growing silicon nanowires is are polymer precursor such as carbonaceous polymer fibers [page 10 lines 22-28]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to have a method of Burchak-2 where the support is polymeric fiber material, because it is suitable support to grow silicon nanowire on it. Claim 14 is rejected as Burchak teaches the carbon-based material (fiber) has mean particle size of 0.01-100 um [see fig. 2, and 3A]. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 07/29/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant argument regarding Cao does not teach new limitations of amended claim 1 is not persuasive as Burchak-2 teaches the new limitation of amended claim 1 (see claim rejection above), Burchak-2 teaches combining silicon nanoparticles and catalyst and bring them in close contact which means mixing and it happens in the reactor( see claim rejection above. Furthermore, Cao is not a part of current claim rejection. furthermore Yao catalyst of CuCl2 leads copper catalyst as it decomposes to copper and Burchak and Burchak-2 both teach catalyst as copper. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TABASSOM TADAYYON ESLAMI whose telephone number is (571)270-1885. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gordon Baldwin can be reached at 5712725166. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TABASSOM TADAYYON ESLAMI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1718
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 19, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 09, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 10, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 12, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12735791
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR REAL-TIME OPTIMIZATION AND CONTROL OF SUBSTRATE IN MOTION CHEMICAL VAPOR DEPOSITION
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729439
METHOD FOR OPERATING A COATING SYSTEM FOR PRODUCING LAYER SYSTEMS
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12733110
Method of Furnishing Three-Dimensional Objects with Electrically Conductive Structures having Low Topography and Low Surface Roughness
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729427
METHOD FOR FORMING REGION-SELECTIVE THIN FILM USING SELECTIVATING AGENT
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722410
MANUFACTURING METHOD OF CONDUCTOR, MANUFACTURING METHOD OF ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE SHIELDING BODY, AND CONDUCTOR
1y 12m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
49%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+26.4%)
3y 5m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 805 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month