Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/731,662

HEAT TREATMENT APPARATUS AND ACCURATE TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT METHOD FOR SEMICONDUCTOR WORKPIECE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 03, 2024
Priority
Jun 26, 2023 — CN 202310762006.1
Examiner
FIN, CAROLYN
Art Unit
2884
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Beijing E-Town Semiconductor Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
219 granted / 355 resolved
-6.3% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+29.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
5 currently pending
Career history
369
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
63.2%
+23.2% vs TC avg
§102
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§112
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 355 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang in view of Storek (US 2021/0272858) in view of Shimuzu (US 2025/0191943). With respect to claims 1 and 13, Storek teaches a heat treatment apparatus for a semiconductor workpiece (110), comprising: one or more heating elements (130 and 140) configured to heat the semiconductor workpiece; an upper cover plate and a lower cover plate (106 and 108); a reaction chamber (105) defined by the upper cover plate, the lower cover plate and a reaction chamber body (formed with 180) ; a workpiece support element (120) configured to support the semiconductor workpiece; at least one infrared emitter (154) located at a first end (above it see Fig 1) of the upper cover plate; and at least one infrared reflection sensor (166) located at a second end (below it) of the upper cover plate, and at least one infrared transmission sensor (168/167) located at a second end (below the cover plate) of the lower cover plate, the second ends are opposite (upper opposite of lower) to the first end, wherein the at least one infrared emitter (154) and the at least one infrared reflection sensor are located at a side (see placement sides shown in Fig. 1) of the upper cover plate facing (see shown facing in see Fig. 1) to the reaction chamber respectively, and the at least one infrared transmission sensor is located at a side (see side shown in Fig. 1) of the lower cover plate facing to the reaction chamber (see facing into the chamber shown in Fig. 1). Storek does not teach the placement of the emitter and sensor on a sidewall. Shimizu teaches wherein the known placement an emitter (140) and sensor (150) located on sidewalls (Fig. 10). The Examiner is taking Official Notice that it is well known in the art that increasing space between a heating element and an infrared detector reduces interference from the heating element. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify Storek to place the elements on the sidewall for the benefit of reducing interference with the heating elements. With respect to claim 2, Storek teaches (paragraph 0066) the at least one infrared emitter emits infrared radiation having one or two wavelengths of 2.3 microns and 2.7 microns. With respect to claims 3-4, Storek teaches the at least one infrared emitter (154), the at least one infrared reflection sensor (166) and the at least one infrared transmission sensor (168); however, does not teach the elements have the same quantity. Shimizu teaches the known use of a same quantity of emitters and receives. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify Storek to use the same quantity since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or working ranges involves only routine skill in the art. In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233. With respect to claims 5-6, Storek teaches the infrared emitter is located at a same straight line as a corresponding infrared transmission sensor (see 154 straight line with 168). With respect to claim 7-8, Storek teaches wherein the upper cover plate and the lower cover plate are high hydroxyl quartz cover plates, respectively (paragraph 0074). With respect to claims 9-10, Storek teaches an angle between the infrared emitter and a longitudinal axis of the reaction chamber body, an angle between the infrared reflection sensor and the longitudinal axis of the reaction chamber body and an angle between the infrared transmission sensor and the longitudinal axis of the reaction chamber body are same, preferably between 30° to 60°, and most preferably 45° (paragraph 0034). With respect to claims 11-12 and 14, Storek teaches the treatment apparatus is capable of accurately measure temperature of the semiconductor workpiece within a range of 400-750 °C (paragraph 0068). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Carolyn Fin whose telephone number is (571)270-1286. The examiner can normally be reached Monday, Wednesday, and Thursday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Uzma Alam can be reached at 571-272-3995. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CAROLYN FIN/Examiner, Art Unit 2884
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 03, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12631576
IDENTIFYING CHARGE SHARING IN X-RAY DIFFRACTION
3y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12611151
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PET IMAGING
4y 11m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12613349
FLAT PANEL X-RAY DETECTOR FOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
3y 3m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12589259
METHOD TO OPTIMALLY SPLITTING ARCS IN MODULATED ARC THERAPY (MAT) PLANS
4y 7m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585035
RADIATION IMAGE PHOTOGRAPHING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+29.9%)
3y 9m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 355 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month