Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/731,791

DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 03, 2024
Priority
Mar 08, 2024 — CN 202410267207.9
Examiner
DINKE, BITEW A
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Wuhan Tianma Micro-Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
578 granted / 792 resolved
+5.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
54 currently pending
Career history
847
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
65.2%
+25.2% vs TC avg
§102
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
§112
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 792 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed on 09/28/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The Applicant argues that in regard to claim 1 that the Wei prior art, does not teach the limitation of “at least a portion of a surface of the touch trace away from the light-emitting unit is provided with a protrusion structure.” In response to this argument, the Examiner directs the applicant’s attention to Wei prior art, which teaches at least a portion of a surface of the touch trace (21/22) away from the light-emitting unit (11/12/13) is provided with a protrusion structure (see Wei, Figs.11-12 as shown below). In addition, during patent examination, the pending claims must be "given their broadest reasonable interpretation consistent with the specification." In re Hyatt, 211 F.3d 1367, 1372, 54 USPQ2d 1664, 1667 (Fed. Cir. 2000). While the claims of issued patents are interpreted in light of the specification, prosecution history, prior art and other claims, this is not the mode of claim interpretation to be applied during examination. During examination, the claims must be interpreted as broadly as their terms reasonably allow. In re American Academy of Science Tech Center, F.3d, 2004 WL 1067528 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2004) (The USPTO uses a different standard for construing claims than that used by district courts; during examination the USPTO must give claims their broadest reasonable interpretation.) This means that the words of the claim must be given their plain meaning unless applicant has provided a clear definition in the specification. In re Zletz, 893 F.2d 319, 321, 13 USPQ2d 1320, 1322 (Fed. Cir. 1989) >; Chef America, Inc. v. Lamb-Weston, Inc., 358 F.3d 1371, 1372, 69 USPQ2d 1857 (Fed. Cir. 2004). The Examiner would further point out that “The use of patents as references is not limited to what the patentees describe as their own inventions or to the problems with which they are concerned. They are part of the literature of the art, relevant for all they contain.” In re Heck, 699 F.2d 1331, 1332-33, 216 USPQ 1038, 1039 (Fed. Cir. 1983) (quoting In re Lemelson, 397 F.2d 1006, 1009, 158 USPQ 275, 277 (CCPA 1968)). Therefore, the Wei prior art reference does meet all the limitation in claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-6 and 13-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wei et al. (CN 116322202 A, hereinafter refer to Wei). U.S. 2024/0315103 (hereinafter refer to Wei) is relied upon solely for the English language translation of CN 116322202 A. Regarding Claim 1: Wei discloses a display panel (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown below and abstract), comprising PNG media_image1.png 303 535 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 528 615 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 432 542 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 373 541 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 376 541 media_image5.png Greyscale a substrate (00) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above); a light-emitting unit (11/12/13), arranged on a side of the substrate (00), wherein the light-emitting unit (11/12/13) comprises a plurality of first light-emitting units (11 or 13) that emits light of a same color (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above); and a touch component (20), arranged on a side of the light-emitting unit (11/12/13) away from the substrate (00) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above), wherein the touch component (20) comprises a touch trace (21/22) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above); the touch trace (22) comprises a first segment (221) and a second segment (222) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above); the first segment (221) and the second segment (222) are distributed along a periphery of a same first light-emitting unit (11 or 13) of the plurality of first light-emitting units (11 or 13) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above); the first segment (221) and the second segment (222) extend in different directions (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above); and the first segment (221) is provided with a first slit (K) that extends through the first segment (221) in a thickness direction of the first segment (221) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above); a plurality of first segments (221) on peripheries of the plurality of first light-emitting units (11 or 13) extends in a same direction (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above); and at least a portion of a surface of the touch trace (21/22) away from the light-emitting unit (11/12/13) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above). First embodiment of Wei is silent upon explicitly disclosing wherein at least a portion of a surface of the touch trace is provided with a protrusion structure. However, second embodiment of Wei teaches wherein at least a portion of a surface of the touch trace (21/22) is provided with a protrusion structure (see Wei, Figs.11-12 as shown below). PNG media_image6.png 483 512 media_image6.png Greyscale PNG media_image7.png 401 658 media_image7.png Greyscale Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of first embodiment of Wei and second embodiment of Wei to enable the first embodiment of Wei touch trace to be provided with a protrusion structure as taught by second embodiment of Wei. Regarding Claim 2: Wei as modified teaches a display panel as set forth in claim 1 as above. The modification of Wei further teaches wherein on a periphery of a same first light-emitting unit (11 or 13), more than two first segments (221) are arranged extending in a same direction (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above). Regarding Claim 3: Wei as modified teaches a display panel as set forth in claim 2 as above. The modification of Wei further teaches wherein the touch trace further comprises two first segments (221) arranged oppositely to each other along a first direction and two second segments (222) arranged oppositely to each other along a second direction (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above); the two first segments (221) and the two second segments (222) are alternately connected end-to-end around the first light-emitting unit (11 or 13) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above); and the first direction intersects with the second direction (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above). Regarding Claim 4: Wei as modified teaches a display panel as set forth in claim 1 as above. The modification of Wei further teaches wherein the light-emitting unit (11/12/13) further comprises a plurality of second light-emitting units (13) that emits light of a same color and a plurality of third light-emitting units (12) that emits light of a same color; and the first segment (221) is distributed on a periphery of a second light-emitting unit (13) of the plurality of second light-emitting units (13) and/or a third light-emitting unit (12) of the plurality of third light-emitting units (11/12/13) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 14 as shown above); or the touch trace (22) comprises a third segment (223) distributed on a periphery of a same second light-emitting unit (13) and/or a same third light-emitting unit (12) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 14 as shown above); an extension direction of the third segment (223) is different from an extension direction of the first segment (221) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 14 as shown above); and the third segment (223) is provided with a second slit (K) that extends through the third segment (223) in a thickness direction of the third segment (223) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 14 as shown above). Regarding Claim 5: Wei as modified teaches a display panel as set forth in claim 1 as above. The modification of Wei further teaches wherein a first light-emitting unit (11) of the plurality of first light-emitting units (11/12/13) is a red light-emitting unit (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above); and the first segment (221) on a periphery of a plurality of red light-emitting units (11) is provided with the first slit (K) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above); or the light-emitting unit further comprises a red light-emitting unit emitting light in a different color than the first light-emitting unit; the touch trace comprises a ring segment located on a periphery of a red light-emitting unit of the plurality of red light-emitting units; and the ring segment is in a closed ring shape. Regarding Claim 6: Wei as modified teaches a display panel as set forth in claim 1 as above. The modification of Wei further teaches wherein quantities of first slits (K) on the periphery of the plurality of first light-emitting units (11 or 13) are identical (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above). Regarding Claim 13: Wei as modified teaches a display panel as set forth in claim 1 as above. The modification of Wei further teaches wherein the light-emitting unit (11/12/13) comprises a red light-emitting unit (11) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above and Fig.10-13); and at least a portion of a surface of the touch trace (22) located on a periphery of the red light-emitting unit (11) includes the protrusion structure (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above and Fig.10-13). Regarding Claim 14: Wei as modified teaches a display panel as set forth in claim 1 as above. The modification of Wei further teaches wherein the protrusion structure is provided on the first segment (221) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above and Fig.10-13); and the protrusion structure is located on both sides of the first slit (K) in an extension direction of the first segment (221) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above and Fig.10-13). Regarding Claim 15: Wei as modified teaches a display panel as set forth in claim 1 as above. The modification of Wei further teaches multiple protrusion structures, wherein the multiple protrusion structures are spaced apart along an extension direction of the touch trace (22) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above and Fig.10-13). Regarding Claim 16: Wei as modified teaches a display panel as set forth in claim 1 as above. The modification of Wei further teaches wherein the touch trace (22/21) encloses to form a hollow area; an orthographic projection of the light-emitting unit (11/12/13) on the substrate (00) is located in an orthographic projection of the hollow area on the substrate (00) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above); and the first segment (221) is a portion of the touch trace (21/22) that encloses to form the hollow area (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above). Regarding Claim 17: Wei as modified teaches a display panel as set forth in claim 1 as above. The modification of Wei further teaches wherein one first slit (K) is provided on a same first segment (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above); or multiple first slits (k) are provided on the first segment (221) and are spaced apart in an extension direction of the first segment (221) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above). Claim(s) 7-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wei et al. (CN 116322202 A, hereinafter refer to Wei) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Fang et al. (WO 2023/184595 A1, hereinafter refer to Fang). U.S. 2024/0315103 (hereinafter refer to Wei) is relied upon solely for the English language translation of CN 116322202 A. Regarding Claim 7: Wei as modified teaches a display panel as applied to claim 1 above. Wei further teaches wherein the touch trace (22) comprises a plurality of touch electrodes (21) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 4 as shown above). Wei is silent upon explicitly disclosing wherein at least two adjacent touch electrodes are spaced apart to form a separation slit; and at least one first slit is reused as the separation slit. For support see Fang, which teaches wherein at least two adjacent touch electrodes (10 and 20) are spaced apart to form a separation slit (see Fang, Figs.2 and 8 as shown below and abstract); and at least one first slit is reused as the separation slit (see Fang, Figs.2 and 8 as shown below and abstract). PNG media_image8.png 457 490 media_image8.png Greyscale PNG media_image9.png 431 477 media_image9.png Greyscale PNG media_image10.png 393 454 media_image10.png Greyscale Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Wei and Fang to enable at least two adjacent touch electrodes are spaced apart to form a separation slit; and at least one first slit is reused as the separation slit as taught by Fang in order to improve the phenomenon of uneven display of the touch display panel. Regarding Claim 8: Wei as modified teaches a display panel as set forth in claim 7 as above. The combination of Wei and Fang further teaches wherein the plurality of touch electrodes (10/40) comprises an effective electrode (10) and a dummy electrode (40) (see Fang, Fig.11 as shown above); and the dummy electrode (40) comprises at least one first segment (421/422) (see Fang, Fig.11 as shown above). Regarding Claim 9: Wei as modified teaches a display panel as set forth in claim 8 as above. The combination of Wei and Fang further teaches wherein the effective electrode (10) comprises a touch sensing electrode (10) and/or a touch driving electrode (10) (see Fang, Fig.11 as shown above). Regarding Claim 10: Wei as modified teaches a display panel as set forth in claim 7 as above. The combination of Wei and Fang further teaches wherein at least one touch electrode (10) comprises a through-hole that traverses the touch electrode (10) (see Fang, Figs.8 and 11 as shown above); and a plurality of through-holes are spaced apart on the touch electrode (10) (see Fang, Figs.8 and 11 as shown above). Claim(s) 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wei et al. (CN 116322202 A, hereinafter refer to Wei) and Fang et al. (WO 2023/184595 A1, hereinafter refer to Fang) as applied to claim 7 above, and further in view of BOK (U.S. 2023/0134963 A1, hereinafter refer to BOK). U.S. 2024/0315103 (hereinafter refer to Wei) is relied upon solely for the English language translation of CN 116322202 A. Regarding Claim 11: Wei as modified teaches a display panel as applied to claim 7 above. The combination of Wei and Fang is silent upon explicitly disclosing wherein a first touch layer and a second touch layer, wherein the plurality of touch electrodes is located on the first touch layer; the second touch layer is provided with a bridging part; and at least two adjacent touch electrodes are electrically connected to each other through the bridging part; and a touch electrode of the plurality of touch electrodes comprises a touch area and a bridging arca; an orthographic projection of the bridging arca on the substrate overlaps with an orthographic projection of the bridging part on the substrate; an orthographic projection of the touch area on the substrate is located outside the orthographic projection of the bridging part on the substrate; and the first segment is located in the touch area. For support see BOK, which teaches wherein a first touch layer (CNT1/ CNT2) and a second touch layer (210), wherein the plurality of touch electrodes (CNT1/ CNT2) is located on the first touch layer (CNT1/ CNT2) (see BOK, Figs.5-6 as shown below and ¶ [0005]); the second touch layer (210) is provided with a bridging part (see BOK, Figs.5-6 as shown below and ¶ [0005]); and at least two adjacent touch electrodes (CNT1/ CNT2) are electrically connected to each other through the bridging part (see BOK, Figs.5-6 as shown below and ¶ [0005]); and a touch electrode of the plurality of touch electrodes (CNT1/ CNT2) comprises a touch area and a bridging area (see BOK, Figs.5-6 as shown below and ¶ [0005]); an orthographic projection of the bridging arca on the substrate overlaps with an orthographic projection of the bridging part on the substrate (see BOK, Figs.5-6 as shown below and ¶ [0005]); an orthographic projection of the touch area on the substrate is located outside the orthographic projection of the bridging part on the substrate (see BOK, Figs.5-6 as shown below and ¶ [0005]); and the first segment is located in the touch area (see BOK, Figs.5-6 as shown below and ¶ [0005]). PNG media_image11.png 512 560 media_image11.png Greyscale PNG media_image12.png 211 497 media_image12.png Greyscale Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Wei, Fang, and BOK to enable first touch layer and a second touch layer, wherein the plurality of touch electrodes located on the first touch layer; the second touch layer provided with a bridging part; and at least two adjacent touch electrodes are electrically connected to each other through the bridging part; and the touch electrode of the plurality of touch electrodes to comprise a touch area and a bridging arca; an orthographic projection of the bridging arca on the substrate overlaps with an orthographic projection of the bridging part on the substrate; an orthographic projection of the touch area on the substrate is located outside the orthographic projection of the bridging part on the substrate; and the first segment is located in the touch area as taught by BOK in order to obtain a display device configured to allow light reflected by a user's fingerprint to be incident on optical sensors without being blocked by electrodes within the display device. Claim(s) 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wei et al. (CN 116322202 A, hereinafter refer to Wei) in view of FAN et al. (U.S. 2018/0107299 A1, hereinafter refer to FAN). U.S. 2024/0315103 (hereinafter refer to Wei) is relied upon solely for the English language translation of CN 116322202 A. Regarding Claim 18: Wei discloses a display apparatus (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above and abstract), comprising: a display panel (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above and abstract), comprising a substrate (00) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above); a light-emitting unit (11/12/13), arranged on a side of the substrate (00), wherein the light-emitting unit (11/12/13) comprises a plurality of first light-emitting units (11 or 13) that emits light of a same color (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above); and a touch component (20), arranged on a side of the light-emitting unit (11/12/13) away from the substrate (00) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above), wherein the touch component (20) comprises a touch trace (21/22) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above); the touch trace (21/22) comprises a first segment (221) and a second segment (222) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above); the first segment (221) and the second segment (222) are distributed along a periphery of a same first light-emitting unit (11 or 13) of the plurality of first light-emitting units (11/12/13) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above); the first segment (221) and the second segment (222) extend in different directions; and the first segment (221) is provided with a first slit (K) that extends through the first segment (221) in a thickness direction of the first segment (221) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above); and a plurality of first segments (221) on peripheries of the plurality of first light- emitting units (11/12/13) extends in a same direction (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above). at least a portion of a surface of the touch trace (21/22) away from the light-emitting unit (11/12/13) (see Wei, Figs.3 and 5-6 as shown above). Wei is silent upon explicitly disclosing wherein at least a portion of a surface of the touch trace is provided with a protrusion structure. For support see FAN, which teaches wherein at least a portion of a surface of the touch trace (Fig.1, 11, 12, 21/22 or Fig.4, 402/403) is provided with a protrusion structure (see FAN, Figs.1 and 4 as shown below and ¶ [0009]). PNG media_image13.png 400 488 media_image13.png Greyscale PNG media_image14.png 586 784 media_image14.png Greyscale Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Wei and FAN to enable the Wei touch trace to be provided with a protrusion structure as taught by FAN in order to eliminate or reduce the reflection by the touch electrode line of the bright and dark stripes and to obtain an improved touch screen display. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BITEW A DINKE whose telephone number is (571)272-0534. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7 a.m. - 5 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Davienne Monbleau can be reached at (571)272-1945. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BITEW A DINKE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 03, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 28, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12757405
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12757548
ARRAY SUBSTRATES AND DISPLAY PANELS
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12751163
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12751185
DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745486
PHOTODETECTOR WITH IMPROVED DETECTION RESULT
4y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+12.2%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 792 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month