Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/732,927

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 04, 2024
Priority
May 14, 2024 — continuation of PCTCN2024093019
Examiner
BRADFORD, PETER
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Yangtze Memory Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
614 granted / 761 resolved
+20.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
795
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
46.4%
+6.4% vs TC avg
§102
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
§112
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 761 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restriction Pursuant to the election with traverse on July 13, 2026 , non-elected claims 12-20 are withdrawn from consideration. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The examiner proposes MEMORY DEVICE WITH VERTICAL CONTACT EMBEDDED IN HORIZONTAL CONDUCTOR Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, and 4-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Lim, US 2017/0271463 A1. Claim 1: Lim discloses a first conductor member (130) extending laterally in a first (horizontal) direction; and a second conductor member (160) extending in a second (vertical) direction, perpendicular to the first direction, into the first conductor member, wherein: a first portion (161) of the second conductor member is embedded in the first conductor member; and in the first direction, a size of the first portion of the second conductor member embedded in the first conductor member is greater than a size of a second portion (162) of the second conductor member outside the first conductor member (FIG. 1B). PNG media_image1.png 488 310 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim 2: the first conductor member comprises an undercut edge configured to receive the first portion of the second conductor member to be in the first conductor member (FIG. 1B). Claim 4: a bottom surface of the first portion of the second conductor member is flush with a bottom surface of the first conductor member (FIG. 1B). Claim 5: a material of the first conductor member (e.g. polysilicon ([0066]) is different from a material of the second conductor member (e.g. metal, [0068]). Claim 6: the first conductor member is a layer positioned in a plane defined by the first direction and a third (second horizontal) direction perpendicular to the first direction; and the second conductor member is a connection structure extending in the second direction, the connection structure being configured to have an electrical connection with the layer ([0068]). Claim 7: Lim discloses a memory array structure (10); a staircase structure (CR) adjacent to the memory array structure and comprising a plurality of stairs extending in a first direction (horizontal, FIG. 11M); and a contact (250+260) extending, in a second direction (vertical) perpendicular to the first direction, through the staircase structure into a conductive layer (230) of one stair of the plurality of stairs in the staircase structure, wherein: a first portion of the contact is embedded in the conductive layer; and in the first direction, a size of the first portion of the contact embedded in the conductive layer is greater than a size of a second portion of the contact outside the conductive layer (FIG. 11M). PNG media_image2.png 424 644 media_image2.png Greyscale Claim 8: wherein the contact comprises: a glue layer (250) in contact with the conductive layer; and a conductor layer (260) surrounded by the glue layer and comprising one or more conductive materials. Claim 9: the conductive layer comprises an undercut edge configured to receive the first portion of the contact in the conductive layer (FIG. 11M). Claim 10: a ratio of a depth of the first portion of the contact into the conductive layer to a thickness of the conductive layer, in the second direction, is between 0.3 and 1 (about 1, FIG. 11M). Claim 11: a depth of the first portion of the contact into the conductive layer is equal to a thickness of the conductive layer, in the second direction FIG. 11M. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lim. Lim does not disclose how much further the furthest edge of the first portion of the second conductor member is than a furthest edge of the second portion of the second conductor member. However, Lim discloses that “the contact plug 160 may be electrically connected to the conductive pattern 130 through the contact plate 161 inserted in the conductive pattern 130. Thus, a contact area between the conductive pattern 130 and the contact plug 160 may be increased to reduce a contact resistance between the conductive pattern 130 and the contact plug 160.” [0070]. Thus the width of the second portion is a result-effective variable: it effects the result of how high the contact resistance is. It would have been within ordinary skill in the art to determine the proper width and thus how much further the first portion would extend horizontally. See MPEP 2144.05(II)(B). Furthermore, changes in dimension are not typically a source of patentable distinction absent unexpected results. MPEP 2144.04(IV). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Nam, US 2019/0013237 A1, which discloses second conductor PLG embedded into first conductor 30. Okawa, US 20170077026 A1, which discloses second conductor 109 embedded into first conductor 102. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER BRADFORD whose telephone number is (571)270-1596. The examiner can normally be reached 10:30-6:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jacob Choi can be reached at 469.295.9060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PETER BRADFORD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 04, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745400
MEMORY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12740244
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12740183
INFRARED DETECTOR UNIT DEVICE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733250
FINFET WITH FIRST FIN ON TOP OF SECOND FIN
5y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12733284
IMAGE SENSOR
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+4.3%)
2y 6m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 761 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month