Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/735,198

WINDING MANDREL, WINDING MACHINE, AND BATTERY CELL WINDING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 06, 2024
Priority
Jan 14, 2022 — CN 202210044920.8 +1 more
Examiner
HIGGINS, KATHERINE NICOLE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
29 granted / 45 resolved
+4.4% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
86
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
68.2%
+28.2% vs TC avg
§102
17.2%
-22.8% vs TC avg
§112
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 45 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on June 6, 2024, February 1, 2025, December 10, 2025, and June 22, 2026 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7 and 13-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Li et al. (CN 112928339 A), hereinafter referred to as Li. Regarding claim 1, Li teaches a winding needle structure for a lithium battery sheet winding machine (“a winding mandrel, configured to wind a battery cell”) (see e.g., paragraph [0001]). Li teaches the winding needle structure includes an inner winding needle 3 (“a first connecting member”) and an outer winding needle 5 (“a second connecting member configured to be combined with the first connecting member”) (see e.g., paragraph [0024] and Figure 5). Li teaches the inner winding needle 3 and the outer winding needle 5 are arranged coaxially (“wherein the second connecting member and the first connecting member are arranged coaxially”) (see e.g., Figure 5) and the length of a combination of the inner winding needle 3 and the outer winding needle 5 is greater than the length of a singular inner winding needle 3 or a singular winding needle (“length of the combined first connecting member and second connecting member is greater than length of the first connecting member or the second connecting member”) (see e.g., Figure 5). Regarding claim 2, Li teaches the instantly claimed invention of claim 1, as previously described. Li teaches the inner winding needle 3 comprises two ends along its own length direction (“wherein the first connecting member comprises two ends along its own length direction”) (see e.g., Figure 5) and the outer winding needle 5 also comprises two ends along its own length direction (“the second connecting member also comprises two ends along its own length direction”) (see e.g., Figure 5). Li teaches the inner winding needle 3 and the outer winding needle 5 are configured to be combined by a connecting rod 17 (“one end of the first connecting member along its length direction and one end of the second connecting member along its length direction are combined”) (see e.g., Figure 5 and paragraph [0027]). Regarding claim 3, Li teaches the instantly claimed invention of claim 2, as previously described. Li teaches the inner winding needle 3 is mounted in an inner winding needle mounting shaft 2 and the outer winding needle 5 is mounted in an outer winding needle mounting shaft (see e.g., paragraph [0024]). Li teaches the connecting rod is installed between the inner winding needle mounting shaft 2 and the outer winding needle mounting shaft 5 via an insertion manner (“wherein one end of the first connecting member along its length direction and one end of the second connecting member along its length direction are connected in an insertion manner”) (see e.g., paragraph [0027]). Regarding claim 4, Li teaches the instantly claimed invention of claim 2, as previously described. Li teaches the inner winding needle 3 is mounted in an inner winding needle mounting shaft 2 and the outer winding needle 5 is mounted in an outer winding needle mounting shaft (see e.g., paragraph [0024]). Li teaches the connecting rod 17 is installed between the inner winding needle mounting shaft 2 and the outer winding needle mounting shaft 5, forming apart from each other (“wherein one end of the first connecting member along its length direction and one end of the second connecting member along its length direction are combined in a manner of being apart from each other”) (see e.g., paragraph [0027]). Regarding claim 5, Li teaches the instantly claimed invention of claim 2, as previously described. Li teaches the connecting rod 17 is installed between the inner winding needle mounting shaft 2 and the outer winding needle mounting shaft 5, forming apart from each other (“wherein the winding mandrel further comprises an intermediate connecting member, and one end of the first connecting member along its length direction and one end of the second connecting member along its length direction are combined through the intermediate connecting member”) (see e.g., paragraph [0027] and Figure 5). Regarding claim 6, Li teaches the instantly claimed invention of claim 5, as previously described. Li teaches the connecting rod 17 is installed between the inner winding needle mounting shaft 2 and the outer winding needle mounting shaft 5, forming apart from each other (“wherein the intermediate connecting member comprises a connecting rod, and two ends of the connecting rod are connected through insertion to one end of the first connecting member along its length direction and one end of the second connecting member along its length direction, respectively”) (see e.g., paragraph [0027] and Figure 5). Regarding claim 7, Li teaches the instantly claimed invention of claim 6, as previously described. Li teaches the connecting rod 17 is a solid rod with a hole in its center (“wherein the connecting rod is a solid rod or a hollow rod”) (see e.g., Figure 5). Regarding claim 13, Li teaches the instantly claimed invention of claim 1, as previously described. Li teaches a lithium battery sheet winding machine (“a winding machine, comprising the winding mandrel according to claim 1”) (see e.g., paragraph [0001]). Regarding claim 14, Li teaches the instantly claimed invention of claim 13, as previously described. Li teaches the lithium battery sheet winding machine includes a winding mandrel telescopic mechanism, where the inner winding needles and the outer winding needles are installed on the mechanism to be drive to approach or leave each other (“wherein the winding machine comprises a winding mandrel telescopic mechanism, and the first connecting member and the second connecting member are installed on the winding mandrel telescopic mechanism so as to be driven by the winding mandrel telescopic mechanism to approach or leave each other”) (see e.g., Figures 2-7 and paragraphs [0010], [0019], and [0027]). Regarding claim 15, Li teaches the instantly claimed invention of claim 1, as previously described. Li teaches a winding method (“a battery cell winding method”) of electrode sheets and a separator (“providing an electrode plate and a separator”) with the winding mandrel according to claim 1 (“winding the electrode plate and the separator using a winding mandrel, wherein the winding mandrel is the winding mandrel according to claim 1”) (see e.g., [0002]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 8-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al. (CN 112928339 A) in view of Bao et al. (CN 201038263 Y), hereinafter referred to as Bao. Regarding claim 8, Li teaches the instantly claimed invention of claim 5, as previously described. Li does not explicitly teach wherein the intermediate connecting member comprises a hollow sleeve, and the first connecting member and the second connecting member are inserted into the hollow sleeve from two ends of the hollow sleeve, respectively. However, Bao teaches a battery coil needle for producing lithium batteries (see e.g., paragraph [0002]). Bao teaches the cylindrical coil needle has axially recessed air grooves on its surface (“wherein the intermediate connecting member comprises a hollow sleeve, and the first connecting member and the second connecting member are inserted into the hollow sleeve from two ends of the hollow sleeve, respectively”) to reduce friction between the diaphragm and the winding needle and to balance the air pressure above and below the diaphragm in order effectively prevent the diaphragm from tearing due to electrostatic adsorption or pressure difference when it is pulled out of the winding needle (see e.g., paragraph [0010]). Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention that one of ordinary skill would modify the connecting rod of Li to have axially recessed air grooves on its surface, as taught by Bao, in order to effectively prevent the diaphragm from tearing due to electrostatic adsorption or pressure difference when it is pulled out of the winding needle (see e.g., paragraph [0010]). Regarding claim 9, Li, as modified by Bao, teaches the instantly claimed invention of claim 8, as previously described. Li, as modified by Bao, teaches the inner winding needle and the outer winding needle are connected to or apart from each other by the connecting rod as taught by Li, as modified by Bao, as previously described in claim 8 (“wherein the first connecting member and the second connecting member are connected to or apart from each other in the hollow sleeve”). Regarding claim 10, Li, as modified by Bao, teaches the instantly claimed invention of claim 8, as previously described. As previously described in claim 8, the connecting rod of Li, as modified by Bao, teaches the connecting rod has axially recessed air grooves on its surface (“wherein the hollow sleeve is provided with a plurality of ventilation holes”) (see e.g., paragraph Bao [0010]). Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al. (CN 112928339 A) in view of Yang (CN 107994259 A). Regarding claim 11, Li teaches the instantly claimed invention of claim 1, as previously described. Li does not explicitly teach wherein surfaces of the first connecting member and the second connecting member are provided with coatings to reduce a frictional force generated during pull-out from the battery cell. However, Yang teaches a winding machine (see e.g., paragraph [0002]). Yang teaches applying a lubricant to the winding needle to reduce friction between the core and the winding needle, thereby avoiding or mitigating the problem of core pulling during cell removal (“wherein surfaces of the first connecting member and the second connecting member are provided with coatings to reduce a frictional force generated during pull-out from the battery cell”) (see e.g., paragraph [0006]). Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention that one of ordinary skill would modify the first winding needle and the second winding needle of Li to have a lubricant applied to their respective surfaces, as taught by Yang, in order to to reduce friction between the core and the winding needle, thereby avoiding or mitigating the problem of core pulling during cell removal (see e.g., paragraph [0006]). Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li et al. (CN 112928339 A) in view of Huang et al. (CN 211858815 U), hereinafter referred to as Huang. Regarding claim 12, Li teaches the instantly claimed invention of claim 2, as previously described. Li does not explicitly teach wherein the other end of the first connecting member along its length direction is provided with a radial connecting hole; the other end of the second connecting member along its length direction is also provided with a radial connecting hole; and the first connecting member and the second connecting member are configured to be fixed to a winding machine through the connecting holes. However, Huang teaches a winding needle structure (see e.g., paragraph [0002]). Huang teaches the first winding needle 100 has a first mounting hole 121 provided on a first connecting seat in order to install the winding needle as a whole on the drive mechanism of the winding machine (“wherein the other end of the first connecting member along its length direction is provided with a radial connecting hole”) (see e.g., paragraph [0056]). Huang teaches the second winding needle 200 includes a second mounting hole 221 on the second connecting seat 220 (“the other end of the second connecting member along its length direction is also provided with a radial connecting hole” and “the first connecting member and the second connecting member are configured to be fixed to a winding machine through the connecting holes”) (see e.g., paragraph [0058]). Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention that one of ordinary skill would modify the first winding needle and the second winding needle of Li to have a mounting hole, as taught by Huang, in order to install the winding needle as a whole to the drive mechanism of the winding machine (see e.g., paragraphs [0056] and [0058]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Zeng et al. (US 20170288274 A1) teaches a winding mandrel that comprises a first winding mandrel and a second winding mandrel which are sequentially provided along the length direction, a first end surface of the first winding mandrel and a second end surface of the second winding mandrel face each other and form a clamping groove; an end of the first end surface which is close to the blank second current collector is beyond an end of the first end surface which is away from the blank second current collector in the length direction; an end of the second end surface which is close to the blank second current collector is beyond an end of the second end surface which is away from the blank second current collector in the length direction (see e.g., paragraph [0006]). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Katherine N Higgins whose telephone number is (703)756-1196. The examiner can normally be reached Mondays - Thursdays 7:30-4:30 EST, Fridays 7:30 - 11:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew T Martin can be reached at (571) 270-7871. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KATHERINE N HIGGINS/Examiner, Art Unit 1728 /MATTHEW T MARTIN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1728
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 06, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676366
SECONDARY BATTERY AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12640425
SECONDARY BATTERY
4y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12626956
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING BATTERIES AND BATTERY OBTAINED BY SAID METHOD
4y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12586849
SEALING STRUCTURE FOR BATTERY
4y 4m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12555878
SECONDARY BATTERY AND INSULATING MEMBER
4y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+22.0%)
3y 9m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 45 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month