Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/735,313

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 06, 2024
Priority
Jul 20, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0094575 +1 more
Examiner
LEE, EUGENE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
742 granted / 907 resolved
+21.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
944
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
73.6%
+33.6% vs TC avg
§102
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
§112
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 907 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 thru 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yoon et al. US 2018/0350818 A1 in view of Kim et al. US 2018/0226411 A1. Yoon discloses (see, for example, FIG. 22) a semiconductor device 700a comprising: a substrate 110, which includes a cell region CELL and a core region CORE/PERI; a boundary element separation film 112C (i.e. inside the interface region INTERFACE) which is placed inside the substrate 110, and separates the cell region CELL and the core region CORE/PERI; and a bit line BLS, which includes layers 156/152/150 which is placed on the cell region CELL and the boundary element separation film 112C and extends along a first direction (i.e. x-direction), wherein the boundary element separation film 112C includes a first region (i.e. left side) and a second region (i.e. right side). The bit line BLS is placed over the boundary element separation film 112C. Yoon does not disclose a separation region capping film which is placed on the boundary element separation film; and … the separation region capping film is placed on the second region of the boundary element separation film, and is not placed on the first region of the boundary element separation film, an upper side of the first region of the boundary element separation film is placed on a plane the same as that of an upper side of the separation region capping film. However, Kim discloses (see, for example, FIG. 7) a semiconductor device 400 comprising an interface region INTERFACE, which includes a separation region capping film 132 above a boundary element separation film 112C. The separation region capping film 132 is placed on the second region of the boundary element separation film 112C, and is not placed on the first region (i.e. left side) of the boundary element separation film 112C, and the upper side of the first region of the boundary element separation film 112C is placed on a plane the same as that of an upper side of the separation region capping film 132. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at a time prior to the effective filing date, to have a separation region capping film which is placed on the boundary element separation film; and … the separation region capping film is placed on the second region of the boundary element separation film, and is not placed on the first region of the boundary element separation film, an upper side of the first region of the boundary element separation film is placed on a plane the same as that of an upper side of the separation region capping film in order to provide further support between the boundary element separation film and the overlying layers, and to improve the prevention of a short circuit between the cell region and core region. Regarding claim 2, see, for example, FIG. 7 wherein Kim discloses the first region of the boundary element separation film 112C being nearer to the cell region CELL than the second region of the boundary element separation film 112C. Regarding claim 3, see, for example, FIG. 7 wherein Kim discloses the boundary element separation film 112C further includes a third region (i.e. farthest right side), the second region of the boundary element separation film 112C being placed between the first region (i.e. left side wherein there is no separation region capping film 132) of the boundary element separation film 112C and the third region of the boundary element separation film 112C, and a height of the upper side of the first region (i.e. left side wherein there is no separation region capping film 132) and an upper side of the third region (farthest right side) of the boundary element separation film 112C being higher than a height of an upper side of the second region (i.e. the middle region of the boundary element separation film 112C where the separation region capping film 132 is placed) of the boundary element separation film 112C. Regarding claim 4, see, for example, FIG. 22 wherein Yoon discloses a buffer layer MIP2. Regarding claim 5, see, for example, FIG. 22 wherein Yoon discloses a bit line capping film 170. INFORMATION ON HOW TO CONTACT THE USPTO Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EUGENE LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-1733. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 730-330 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JOSHUA BENITEZ can be reached at 571-270-1435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Eugene Lee June 20, 2026 /EUGENE LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2815
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684826
AVALANCHE-PROTECTED TRANSISTORS USING A BOTTOM BREAKDOWN CURRENT PATH AND METHODS OF FORMING THE SAME
3y 12m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677650
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURES AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12666995
PACKAGE STRUCTURE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12652964
A-axis Josephson Junctions with Improved Contacts
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12641833
THIN FILM TRANSISTOR, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF AND CIRCUIT
3y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+5.4%)
2y 8m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 907 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month