Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/735,840

DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 06, 2024
Examiner
CHOWDHURY, ROCKSHANA D
Art Unit
2841
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
517 granted / 644 resolved
+12.3% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
673
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.1%
+12.1% vs TC avg
§102
38.9%
-1.1% vs TC avg
§112
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 644 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention I (reads on claims 1-10) in the reply filed on 06/06/2024 is acknowledged. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 5 and 7-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) (1) as being anticipated by Shin et al. (US Pub No. 2021/0373604 A1 and Shin hereinafter) Regarding Claim 1, Shin discloses (see annotated fig below) a display device comprising: a display panel (100) having a first non-folding region (NFA1), a folding region (FA), and a second non-folding region (NFA2) arranged in a first direction (Y), wherein the folding region is adjacent to the first and second non-folding regions and is foldable about a folding axis (fig.9); and a lower substrate (200) disposed under the display panel, wherein the lower substrate includes a spacing portion and a pattern portion, the spacing portion overlaps the folding region on a plane (fig.9), and the pattern portion is spaced apart from the display panel by the spacing portion in a thickness direction (Z) of the display device, the pattern portion including a plurality of holes. PNG media_image1.png 792 853 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 3, Shin discloses (see annotated fig below) the display device of claim 1, wherein the lower substrate includes a first region overlapping the first non-folding region, a second region overlapping the second non-folding region, and a third region overlapping the folding region, the third region including the spacing portion and the pattern portion, and wherein the first region, the second region, and the third region include a same material as each other (metal). PNG media_image2.png 848 848 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 5, Shin discloses (see annotated fig below) the display device of claim 1, wherein the spacing portion has a height that is less than or equal to one-third of a thickness of the lower substrate. PNG media_image3.png 782 848 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 7, Shin discloses (see annotated fig below) the display device of claim 1, wherein the spacing portion has a greater width (WS) in the first direction than a width (WF) of the folding region in the first direction. PNG media_image4.png 848 856 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 8, Shin discloses (see annotated fig below) the display device of claim 1, wherein the spacing portion has a greater width (WS) in the first direction than a width (WP) of the pattern portion in the first direction. PNG media_image5.png 803 810 media_image5.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2 and 9-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shin et al in view of Lee et al (US Pub No. 2022/0058991 A1 and Lee hereinafter) Regarding Claim 2, Shin discloses the display device of claim 1, but fails to disclose wherein a width of the pattern portion in the first direction increases as a distance from the display panel increases in the thickness direction of the display device. However, Lee teaches (see annotated fig below) wherein a width of the pattern portion in the first PNG media_image6.png 546 737 media_image6.png Greyscale direction increases as a distance from the display panel increases in the thickness direction (Z) of the display device. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine a width of the pattern portion increasing towards thickness direction of Lee to device of Shin in order to improve flexibility and the support member may have improved durability by including a coating layer coated thereon (Lee, [0009]) Regarding Claim 9, Shin discloses the display device of claim 1, but fails to disclose a resin material filling the spacing portion. However, Lee teaches (see annotated fig.7) a resin material (500) filling the spacing portion. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine a resin material filling the spacing portion of Lee to device of Shin in order to improve flexibility and the support member may have improved durability by including a coating layer coated thereon (Lee, [0009]) Regarding Claim 10, Shin discloses the display device of claim 1, but fails to disclose wherein: the plurality of holes extends in a second direction crossing the first direction, the plurality of holes including a first hole group and a second hole group spaced apart from each other in the first direction; and the first hole group and the second hole group are staggered with respect to each other. However, Lee teaches (see annotated fig.6) the plurality of holes extends in a second direction crossing the first direction, the PNG media_image7.png 668 668 media_image7.png Greyscale plurality of holes including a first hole group and a second hole group spaced apart from each other in the first direction; and the first hole group and the second hole group are staggered with respect to each other. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the plurality of holes extends in a second direction crossing the first direction, the plurality of holes including a first hole group and a second hole group spaced apart of Lee to device of Shin in order to improve flexibility and the support member may have improved durability by including a coating layer coated thereon (Lee, [0009]) Claims 4 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shin et al in view of Park et al (US Pub No. 2021/0118337 A1 and Park hereinafter) Regarding Claim 4, Shin discloses the display device of claim 1, but fails to disclose a wherein the lower substrate is a glass substrate. However, Park teaches (fig.5A) wherein the lower substrate (210 and 220) is a glass substrate. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the plurality of holes extends in a second direction crossing the first direction, the plurality of holes including a first hole group and a second hole group spaced apart of Park to device of Shin in order to provide rigidity and flatness of the display panel (Park, [0067]) Regarding Claim 6, Shin discloses the display device of claim 1, but fails to disclose a wherein the lower substrate is a glass substrate. However, Park teaches (fig.3) wherein the spacing portion (230) has a height in a range of about 10 micrometers to about 100 micrometers ([0064]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine a glass substrate of Park to device of Shin in order to provide rigidity and flatness of the display panel (Park, [0067]) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROCKSHANA D CHOWDHURY whose telephone number is (571)272-1602. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8 AM - 4:30 PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allen L Parker can be reached at 303-297-4722. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROCKSHANA D CHOWDHURY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2841
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602077
DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602090
SUPPORT PLATE FOR FOLDING PORTABLE DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602076
ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING HINGE MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596404
FLEXIBLE DISPLAY MODULE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596410
PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.1%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 644 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month