Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/737,744

CURRENT SENSE CIRCUIT AND CURRENT SENSING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 07, 2024
Examiner
RIOS RUSSO, RAUL J
Art Unit
2858
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Infineon Technologies AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
518 granted / 599 resolved
+18.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
627
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.2%
-30.8% vs TC avg
§103
36.9%
-3.1% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 599 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 06/07/2024 and 08/29/2024 has been considered by the examiner. Oath/Declaration Oath/Declaration as file 07/29/2024 is noted by the Examiner. Title Objection The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation “…comprises adjusting a start measurement value of the measurement circuit based on a measurement value…” in lines 4-5 of Claim 1. It is not clear if the limitation in question refers to the same “current measurement circuit” or if it refers to a different “measurement circuit”. If this is the case, then please change the limitation to “the current measurement circuit”. Claims 2-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph as they further limit Claim 1. Please make the proper corrections. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 and 6-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Babazadeh et al. US 2014/0002037 (Provided by Applicant; Hereinafter Babazadeh). Regarding claim 1, Babazadeh teaches a method (Figs. 1-4), comprising: measuring a current (Figs. 1-4; Abstract; [0013-0014]) in a conductor (Figs. 1-4; [0013-0018, 0028, 0029]; buck, boost, buck-boost, flyback and SEPIC converters) in successive measurement cycles (Figs. 1-4; Abstract; [0014]; “The current is estimated cycle-by-cycle based on the measured current in the previous cycle and a prediction of the pulse width of the present cycle.”) using a current measurement circuit (Figs. 1-4; [0013, 0014, 0019-0024]; circuits implement cycle-by-cycle current estimation), wherein measuring the current (Figs. 1-4; [0013, 0014, 0019-0024]; circuits implement cycle-by-cycle current estimation), in each of the successive measurement cycles (Figs. 1-4; [0014]), comprises adjusting a start measurement value of the measurement circuit (Figs. 1-4; [0016-0021]; controller, 106) based on a measurement value obtained in a preceding measurement cycle (Figs. 1-4; [0013, 0014, 0019-0024]; “The current is estimated cycle-by-cycle based on the measured current in the previous cycle and a prediction of the pulse width of the present cycle.”). Regarding claim 2, Babazadeh further teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the start measurement value is obtained in the preceding measurement cycle at a time instance that is different from a beginning of the preceding measurement cycle and that is different from an end of the preceding measurement cycle (Figs. 1-4; [0013, 0014, 0019-0024]; “The current is estimated cycle-by-cycle based on the measured current in the previous cycle and a prediction of the pulse width of the present cycle.”). Regarding claim 3, Babazadeh further teaches the method of claim 1, wherein measuring the current comprises measuring the current in a power converter (Figs. 1-4; [0013-0018, 0028, 0029]; converter) that includes at least one electronic switch (Figs. 1-4; [0016-0021]; switching regulator). Regarding claim 4, Babazadeh further teaches the method of claim 3, wherein each of the successive measurement cycles (Figs. 1-4; [0013, 0014, 0019-0024]; “The current is estimated cycle-by-cycle based on the measured current in the previous cycle and a prediction of the pulse width of the present cycle.”) is during an on-time of the at least one electronic switch (Figs. 1-4; [0016-0021]; switching regulator) and is shorter than the on-time of the at least one electronic switch (Figs. 1-4; [0016-0021]; switching regulator). Regarding claim 6, Babazadeh further teaches the method of claim 3, wherein the power converter is selected from the group consisting of: a buck converter ([0013]; buck converter); a boost converter ([0013]; boost converter); a buck-boost converter ([0013]; buck-boost converter); a flyback converter ([0013]; flyback converter); and a Sepic converter ([0013]; SEPIC converter). Regarding claim 7, Babazadeh teaches a current measurement circuit (Figs. 1-4; [0013, 0014, 0019-0024]; circuits implement cycle-by-cycle current estimation) configured to measure a current (Figs. 1-4; Abstract; [0013-0014]) in a conductor (Figs. 1-4; [0013-0018, 0028, 0029]; buck, boost, buck-boost, flyback and SEPIC converters) in successive measurement cycles (Figs. 1-4; Abstract; [0014]; “The current is estimated cycle-by-cycle based on the measured current in the previous cycle and a prediction of the pulse width of the present cycle.”), wherein the current measurement circuit (Figs. 1-4; [0013, 0014, 0019-0024]; circuits implement cycle-by-cycle current estimation) is further configured, in each of the successive measurement cycles (Figs. 1-4; [0014]), to adjust a start measurement value based on a measurement value (Figs. 1-4; [0016-0021]; controller, 106) obtained in a preceding measurement cycle (Figs. 1-4; [0013, 0014, 0019-0024]; “The current is estimated cycle-by-cycle based on the measured current in the previous cycle and a prediction of the pulse width of the present cycle.”). Regarding claim 8, Babazadeh further teaches the current measurement circuit according to claim 7, wherein the current measurement circuit is configured to obtain the start measurement value in the preceding measurement cycle at a time instance that is different from a beginning of the preceding measurement cycle and that is different from an end of the preceding measurement cycle (Figs. 1-4; [0013, 0014, 0019-0024]; “The current is estimated cycle-by-cycle based on the measured current in the previous cycle and a prediction of the pulse width of the present cycle.”). Regarding claim 9, Babazadeh teaches a power converter (Figs. 1-4), comprising: at least one electronic switch (Figs. 1-4; [0016-0021]; switching regulator); a control circuit (Figs. 1-4; [0016-0021]; controller, 106) configured to control operation of the at least one electronic switch (Figs. 1-4; [0016-0021]; switching regulator); and a current measurement circuit (Figs. 1-4; [0013, 0014, 0019-0024]; circuits implement cycle-by-cycle current estimation) configured to measure a current (Figs. 1-4; Abstract; [0013-0014]) in a conductor (Figs. 1-4; [0013-0018, 0028, 0029]; buck, boost, buck-boost, flyback and SEPIC converters) of the power converter (Figs. 1-4; [0013-0018, 0028, 0029]) in successive measurement cycles (Figs. 1-4; Abstract; [0014]; “The current is estimated cycle-by-cycle based on the measured current in the previous cycle and a prediction of the pulse width of the present cycle.”) and provide a current measurement signal based on the measured current to the control circuit (Figs. 1-4; [0016-0021]; controller, 106), wherein the current measurement circuit (Figs. 1-4; [0013, 0014, 0019-0024]; circuits implement cycle-by-cycle current estimation) is further configured, in each of the successive measurement cycles (Figs. 1-4; [0014]), to adjust a start measurement value based on a measurement value obtained in a preceding measurement cycle (Figs. 1-4; [0013, 0014, 0019-0024]; “The current is estimated cycle-by-cycle based on the measured current in the previous cycle and a prediction of the pulse width of the present cycle.”). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5 and 10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding claim 5, the prior art does not teach or suggest, in combination with the rest of the limitations of claims 1, 3 and 4, “…wherein the at least one electronic switch has a minimum on-time, and wherein the start measurement value is obtained at a time instance when the minimum on-time of the at least one electronic switch expires.” Regarding claim 10, the prior art does not teach or suggest, in combination with the rest of the limitations of claim 9, “…wherein the control circuit is configured to operate the at least one electronic switch in a plurality of successive drive cycles each including a minimum on-time; and wherein the current measurement circuit is configured to obtain the start measurement value at a time instance at which the minimum on-time in each of the plurality of successive drive cycles expires.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Wang et al. US 2024/0006986 - A voltage spike measurement circuit for a power switch includes a rectifier unit, a capacitive divider unit and a discharge unit, the rectifier unit configured to receive a voltage signal at both ends of a power switch and output a rectified signal. Kris et al. US 2016/0344289 - The average of a complex waveform measured over a time period may be determined by first converting the complex waveform to a voltage, then converting this voltage to a current and using this current to charge a capacitor. Hartlieb et al. US 2010/0315091 - A method detects a short circuit in a load current path that includes an inductive load. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAUL J RIOS RUSSO whose telephone number is (571)270-3459. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday: 10am-6pm, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Huy Phan can be reached at 571-272-7924. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAUL J RIOS RUSSO/Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 07, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601774
LOW NOISE READOUT INTERFACE FOR CAPACITIVE SENSORS WITH NEGATIVE CAPACITANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590884
Method for Detecting Corrosion Severity of a Metallic Surface on a Pipeline
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583028
FIBER STRUCTURE WITH IMPROVED FLEXIBILITY AND RESPONSIVENESS AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578362
TEST DEVICES AND SYSTEMS THAT UTILIZE EFFICIENT TEST ALGORITHMS TO EVALUATE DEVICES UNDER TEST
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571931
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AUTONOMOUS GRAVITY AND/OR MAGNETIC FIELD MEASUREMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+9.2%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 599 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month