Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/737,774

NEURAL NETWORK-BASED LOCATION IDENTIFICATION TO PLACE OBJECTS IN A GRAPHICALLY RENDERED SCENE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jun 07, 2024
Examiner
BROOME, SAID A
Art Unit
2612
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
NVIDIA Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
626 granted / 765 resolved
+19.8% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
779
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
§103
69.8%
+29.8% vs TC avg
§102
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
§112
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 765 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the claims Claims 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 have been amended. Claims 3-7, 10-14 and 17-20 have been previously presented. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claims contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 1 recites the following subject matter that was not disclosed in the applicant’s originally filed Specification: “…generate, using a large language model, information corresponding to a layout of a graphical scene from one or more text or speech inputs that describe the graphical scene; identify, using the large language model based on the information, a respective location for each of one or more objects in the graphical scene…cause, using a vision language model, an image of the graphical scene to be generated that depicts the one or more objects at their respective locations.“. Claims 8 and 15 recite similar new matter as well. Therefore claims 1-20 fail to comply with the written description requirement. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed 04/07/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The 04/07/26 amendments to claims 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 have overcome the 35 U.S.C. 112(b) rejection of claims 1-20. However, the 04/07/26 amendments to claims 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 recites new matter which was not disclosed in the applicant’s Specification. Appropriate correction is required. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Said Broome whose telephone number is (571)272-2931. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Said Broome/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 07, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 07, 2026
Response Filed
May 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12620223
IDENTIFYING VARIATION IN SURGICAL APPROACHES
2y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12620163
High-Fidelity Micro-Doppler Effect Simulator
2y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12620145
LUMINANCE-PRESERVING AND TEMPORALLY STABLE DALTONIZATION
2y 6m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12611255
SURGICAL SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES EMPLOYING AUGMENTED REALITY (AR) FOR PLANNING
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12608876
Method for calculating one or more isovists of a physical or extended reality environment
2y 4m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+17.2%)
2y 9m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 765 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month