Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/740,117

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IN-GAME EVENTS

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jun 11, 2024
Examiner
DEODHAR, OMKAR A
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Kabam Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
1025 granted / 1284 resolved
+9.8% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1324
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§103
36.6%
-3.4% vs TC avg
§102
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§112
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1284 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Procedural Summary This is responsive to the claims filed 10/3/2024. Applicant’s priority to 12/16/2013 is noted and acknowledged. Claims 1-20 are pending. The Drawings filed 10/3/2024 are noted. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No.: 12,048,875 B2 in view of Korbecki (US 2015/0169705): Claims 1-20 of the ‘875 patent disclose the invention substantially but do not make explicit that the device specification information is graphical processing capabilities. However, in a related invention, Korbecki teaches a media recommendation platform that analyzes a client’s graphical processing capabilities to determine format and type of content transmitted for display, (Korbecki, e.g., ¶¶ 86, 87.) It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of Applicant’s filing to have modified the patented claims such that the device specification information including graphical processing capabilities are analyzed, as suggested by Korbecki, for several reasons including minimizing latency. Pending Claims Patented Claims 1. A system to provide recommendations to users of an online game, wherein the users include a first user, wherein the first user is associated with a first client computing device, the system comprising: one or more processors configured by machine-readable instructions to: obtain first device specification information for the first client computing device, wherein the first device specification information includes information regarding graphical processing capabilities of the first client computing device; obtain a first recommendation for the first user based on the first device specification information, wherein the first recommendation pertains to gameplay within the online game; and effectuate a presentation, based on the first recommendation, to the first user. 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the first recommendation pertains to performing at least one of (i) interact with specific content in the online game, (ii) purchase a virtual item within the online game, and (iii) establish a relationship with one or more players within the online game. 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the first recommendation pertains to participating in one or more actions within the online game that are suited to an interface of the first client computing device. 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the first recommendation pertains to participating in one or more actions within the online game based on at least one of (i) processing capabilities of the first client computing device, and (ii) storage capabilities of the first client computing device. 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are further configured by machine-readable instructions to: obtain second device specification information for a second client computing device associated with the first user, wherein the second device specification information includes information regarding graphical processing capabilities of the second client computing device; obtain a second recommendation for the first user based on the second device specification information, wherein the second recommendation pertains to additional gameplay within the online game; and effectuate a second presentation, based on the second recommendation, to the first user. 6. The system of claim 5, wherein the first recommendation and the second recommendation include one or more offers to participate in one or more actions within the online game that are suited to the first and second device specification information for the first client device and the second client device, such that both the first client device and second client device may be used simultaneously when participating in the one or more actions within the online game. 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the first recommendation pertains to participating in particular actions within the online game that are suited to input capabilities of the first client computing device. 8. The system of claim 7, wherein the input capabilities of the first client computing device include a touch screen, such that the first recommendation pertains to participating in the particular actions within the online game that are suited to interactions by the first user through the touch screen. 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the first recommendation is an offer to obtain one or more virtual items to the first user. 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the one or more virtual items are related to the first device specification information for the first client computing device associated with the first user. 11. A method for providing recommendations to users of an online game, wherein the users include a first user, wherein the first user is associated with a first client computing device, the method being implemented on a computer system that includes one or more physical processors configured by machine-readable instructions, the method comprising: obtaining first device specification information for the first client computing device, wherein the first device specification information includes information regarding graphical processing capabilities of the first client computing device; obtaining a first recommendation for the first user based on the first device specification information, wherein the first recommendation pertains to gameplay within the online game; and effectuate a presentation, based on the first recommendation, to the first user. 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the first recommendation pertains to performing at least one of (i) interact with specific content in the online game, (ii) purchase a virtual item within the online game, and (iii) establish a relationship with one or more players within the online game. 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the first recommendation pertains to participating in one or more actions within the online game that are suited to an interface of the first client computing device. 14. The method of claim 11, wherein the first recommendation pertains to participating in one or more actions within the online game based on at least one of (i) processing capabilities of the first client computing device, and (ii) storage capabilities of the first client computing device. 15. The method of claim 11, further comprising: obtaining second device specification information for a second client computing device associated with the first user, wherein the second device specification information includes information regarding graphical processing capabilities of the second client computing device; obtaining a second recommendation for the first user based on the second device specification information, wherein the second recommendation pertains to additional gameplay within the online game; and effectuating a second presentation, based on the second recommendation, to the first user. 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the first recommendation and the second recommendation include one or more offers to participate in one or more actions within the online game that are suited to the first and second device specification information for the first client device and the second client device, such that both the first client device and second client device may be used simultaneously when participating in the one or more actions within the online game. 17. The method of claim 11, wherein the first recommendation pertains to participating in particular actions within the online game that are suited to input capabilities of the first client computing device. 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the input capabilities of the first client computing device include a touch screen, such that the first recommendation pertains to participating in the particular actions within the online game that are suited to interactions by the first user through the touch screen. 19. The method of claim 11, wherein the first recommendation is an offer to obtain one or more virtual items to the first user. 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the one or more virtual items are related to the first device specification information for the first client computing device associated with the first user. 1. A system to provide recommendations to users of an online game, wherein the users include a first user, wherein the first user is associated with a first client computing device, the system comprising: one or more processors configured by machine-readable instructions to: obtain first device specification information for the first client computing device, wherein the first device specification information includes information regarding specifications of the first client computing device; determine a first recommendation for the first user based on the first device specification information, wherein the first recommendation pertains to an action within the online game; and effectuate a presentation, based on the first recommendation, to the first user. 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the first recommendation pertains to performing at least one of (i) interact with specific content in the online game, (ii) purchase a virtual item within the online game, and (iii) establish a relationship with one or more other users within the online game. 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the first recommendation pertains to participating in one or more actions within the online game that are suited to an interface of the first client computing device. 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the first recommendation pertains to participating in one or more actions within the online game based on at least one of (i) processing capabilities of the first client computing device, and (ii) storage capabilities of the first client computing device. 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are further configured by machine-readable instructions to: obtain second device specification information for a second client computing device associated with the first user, wherein the second device specification information includes information regarding specifications of the second client computing device; determine a second recommendation for the first user based on the second device specification information, wherein the second recommendation pertains to a second action within the online game; and effectuate a second presentation, based on the second recommendation, to the first user. 6. The system of claim 5, wherein the first recommendation and the second recommendation include one or more offers to participate in one or more actions within the online game that are suited to the first and second device specification information for the first client device and the second client device, such that both the first client device and second client device may be used simultaneously when participating in the one or more actions within the online game. 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the first recommendation pertains to participating in particular actions within the online game that are suited to input capabilities of the first client computing device. 8. The system of claim 7, wherein the input capabilities of the first client computing device include a touch screen, such that the first recommendation pertains to participating in the particular actions within the online game that are suited to interactions by the first user through the touch screen. 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the first recommendation is an offer to purchase one or more virtual items having an associated cost to the first user. 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the associated cost is related to device specification information for client computing devices associated with the users, such that the associated cost to the first user for the offer to purchase the one or more virtual items is related to the first device specification information for the first client computing device associated with the first user. 11. A method for providing recommendations to users of an online game, wherein the users include a first user, wherein the first user is associated with a first client computing device, the method being implemented on a computer system that includes one or more physical processors configured by machine-readable instructions, the method comprising: obtaining first device specification information for the first client computing device, wherein the first device specification information includes information regarding specifications of the first client computing device; determining a first recommendation for the first user based on the first device specification information, wherein the first recommendation pertains to an action within the online game; and effectuate a presentation, based on the first recommendation, to the first user. 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the first recommendation pertains to performing at least one of (i) interact with specific content in the online game, (ii) purchase a virtual item within the online game, and (iii) establish a relationship with one or more other users within the online game. 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the first recommendation pertains to participating in one or more actions within the online game that are suited to an interface of the first client computing device. 14. The method of claim 11, wherein the first recommendation pertains to participating in one or more actions within the online game based on at least one of (i) processing capabilities of the first client computing device, and (ii) storage capabilities of the first client computing device. 15. The method of claim 11, further comprising: obtaining second device specification information for a second client computing device associated with the first user, wherein the second device specification information includes information regarding specifications of the second client computing device; determining a second recommendation for the first user based on the second device specification information, wherein the second recommendation pertains to a second action within the online game; and effectuating a second presentation, based on the second recommendation, to the first user. 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the first recommendation and the second recommendation include one or more offers to participate in one or more actions within the online game that are suited to the first and second device specification information for the first client device and the second client device, such that both the first client device and second client device may be used simultaneously when participating in the one or more actions within the online game. 17. The method of claim 11, wherein the first recommendation pertains to participating in particular actions within the online game that are suited to input capabilities of the first client computing device. 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the input capabilities of the first client computing device include a touch screen, such that the first recommendation pertains to participating in the particular actions within the online game that are suited to interactions by the first user through the touch screen. 19. The method of claim 11, wherein the first recommendation is an offer to purchase one or more virtual items having an associated cost to the first user. 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the associated cost is related to device specification information the client computing devices associated with the users, such that the associated cost to the first user for the offer to purchase the one or more virtual items is related to the first device specification information for the first client computing device associated with the first user. Conclusion Additional Relevant References: See 892 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OMKAR A DEODHAR whose telephone number is (571)272-1647. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F, generally 9am-5:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Lewis can be reached on 571-272-7673. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OMKAR A DEODHAR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594500
CONTENT MODIFICATION SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594497
VISUAL PERCEPTION ASSISTANCE APPARATUS AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589315
VIRTUAL AND AUGMENTED REALITY SHOOTING SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589306
IMAGE FRAME PROCESSING METHOD AND AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE SUPPORTING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12573262
AMUSEMENT GAMING ACCESS AND AUTHORIZATION POINT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+19.3%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1284 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month