Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/741,784

ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 13, 2024
Priority
Aug 29, 2019 — provisional 62/893,802 +3 more
Examiner
LIU, MIKKA H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Innolux Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
560 granted / 607 resolved
+32.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
635
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
38.7%
-1.3% vs TC avg
§102
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
§112
31.3%
-8.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 607 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is responsive to an Application filed on 06/13/2024, which is a continuation application of and claims the priority benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 18/073,580, filed on 12/02/2022, which is a continuation application of and claims the priority benefit of U.S. patent application serial no. 16/995,828, filed on 08/18/2020, which claims the priority benefits of U.S. provisional application serial no. 62/893,802, filed on 08/29/2019. Currently, claims 1-11 are examined as below. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. 16/995,828, filed on 06/12/2020. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: (Marked-Up Version) Electronic Device with Optical Structures for Light Emission Control (Clean Version) Electronic Device with Optical Structures for Light Emission Control Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6 and 9-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2018/0210280 A1 to Chen et al. (“Chen”). PNG media_image1.png 597 873 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding independent claim 1, Chen in Fig. 10 teaches an electronic device 10 (Fig. 10 & ¶ 48, display device 10), comprising: a first substrate 148 (¶ 45, encapsulation layer 148); a second substrate 102 (¶ 48, first substrate 102) disposed opposite to the first substrate 148 (Fig. 10); a first light emitting diode 100 (Fig. 10, ¶ 20, ¶ 48, the rightmost light-emitting unit 100 is an LED) and a second light emitting diode 100 (Fig. 10, ¶ 20, ¶ 48, light-emitting unit 100, which is an LED, in the middle) disposed between the first substrate 148 and the second substrate 102 and adjacent to each other; a first optical structure 144, 146 (Fig. 10, ¶ 35, a collective of transparent layer 144 and filter layer 146) and a second optical structure 130R, 142 (Fig. 10, ¶ 34, a collective of second quantum dot portion 130R and filtering portion 142) disposed between the first substrate 148 and the second substrate 102, wherein an orthographic projection of the first optical structure 144, 146 on the second substrate 102 overlaps an orthographic projection of the first light emitting diode 100 on the second substrate 102 (Fig. 10), and an orthographic projection of the second optical structure 130R, 142 on the second substrate 102 overlaps an orthographic projection of the second light emitting diode 100 on the second substrate 102 (Fig. 2), and wherein a light emitted from the first light emitting diode 100 passes through the first optical structure 144, 148 to provide a blue light (Fig. 10, ¶ 24, light emits through the aperture 132B is blue light), a light emitted from the second light emitting diode 100 passes through the second optical structure 130R, 142 to provide a light having a color different from blue (Fig. 10, ¶ 39, aperture 132R is of red sub-pixel that emits red light), and the first optical structure 144, 146 comprises a scattering element (¶ 35, scattering particles). Regarding claim 2, Chen in Fig. 10 further teaches the first light emitting diode 100 is disposed between the second substrate 102 and the first optical structure 144, 146. Regarding claim 3, Chen in Fig. 10 further teaches the first optical structure 144, 146 further comprises a first color filter element 146 (¶ 35, filter layer 146 is a filter layer used for blue light i.e., color filter element). Regarding claim 4, Chen in Fig. 10 further teaches the first color filter element 146 is disposed between the first substrate 148 and the scattering element 144. Regarding claim 5, Chen in Fig. 10 further teaches the second light emitting diode 100 is disposed between the second substrate 102 and the second optical structure 130R, 142. Regarding claim 6, Chen in Fig. 10 further teaches the second optical structure 130R, 142 comprises a second color filter element 142 (¶ 34, filtering portion 142 blocking blue light). Regarding claim 9, Chen in Fig. 10 further teaches the second optical structure 130R, 142 further comprises a color conversion element 130R (¶ 23, second quantum dot portion 130R converts light emitted from the light-emitting unit 100 into red light), wherein the second color filter element 142 is disposed between the first substrate 148 and the color conversion element 130R (Fig. 10). Regarding claim 10, Chen in Fig. 10 further teaches a bank layer 134 (¶ 25, first shielding portion 134), wherein the bank layer comprises a first opening (Fig. 10, ¶ 39, the opening between two sections of the first shielding portion 134 corresponding to the rightmost light-emitting unit 100, since a display device includes green sub-pixels, red sub-pixels and blue sub-pixels, each of the sub-pixels correspond to a light-emitting unit 100), and the scattering element 144 is disposed in the first opening (Fig. 10). Regarding claim 11, Chen in Fig. 10 further teaches the bank layer 134 comprises a second opening (Fig. 10, the opening between two sections of the first shielding portion 134 corresponding to the light-emitting unit 100 in the middle), and the color conversion element 13R is disposed in the second opening (Fig. 10). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 7-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen in view of US 2017/0076678 A1 to Lee et al. (“Lee”). Regarding claim 7, Chen in Fig. 10 teaches a first color filter layer 146 (¶ 35, filter layer 146 is a filter layer used for blue light i.e., color filter layer), wherein a portion of the first color filter layer 146 is the first color filter element 146 of the first optical structure 144, 146; and a second color filter layer 142 (¶ 34, filtering portion 142 blocking blue light), wherein a portion of the second color filter layer 142 is the second color filter element 142 of the second optical structure 130R, 142. Chen further discloses the optical structures 144, 146, 130R, 142 are parts of a light conversion layer 108 (Fig. 10, ¶ 20). Chen does not explicitly disclose another portion of the first color filter layer and another portion of the second color filter layer are stacked to form a light blocking structure. Lee recognizes a need for preventing color mixing in a display device (¶ 3, ¶ 49). Lee satisfies the need by providing a first color filter layer 320B, 320B’ (Fig. 1, ¶ 48, a collective of blue color filters 320B and 320B’), wherein a portion of the first color filter layer 320B is a first color filter element 320B (Fig. 1, ¶ 48, ¶ 74, blue color filter 320B overlaps the color conversion layer 330B); and a second color filter layer 320R, 320R’ (Fig. 1, ¶ 48, a collective of red color filters 320R and 320R’), wherein a portion of the second color filter layer 320R is a second color filter element 320R (Fig. 1, ¶ 48, ¶ 74, red color filter 320R overlaps the color conversion layer 330R), wherein another portion 320B’ (Fig. 1) of the first color filter layer 320B, 320B’ and another portion 320R’ (Fig. 1) of the second color filter layer 320R, 320R’ are stacked to form a light blocking structure 320 (Fig. 1, ¶ 50, partition 320 formed by overlapping the color filters 320R and 320B’ is a light blocking region SA). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify light conversion layer taught by Chen with the structure of the first and second color filter layers taught by Lee, so as to prevent color mixing in a display device (Lee: ¶ 3, ¶ 49). Regarding claim 8, the combination of Chen and Lee further teaches an orthographic projection of the light blocking structure 320 (Lee: Fig. 1; Chen: Fig. 10. Lee’s structure 320 would replace the Chen’s first shielding portion 134 (Chen: ¶ 25)) on (i.e., in proximity to) the second substrate 102 (Chen: Fig. 10) is disposed between the orthographic projection of the first light emitting diode 100 (Chen) on the second substrate 102 and the orthographic projection of the second light emitting diode 100 (Chen) on the second substrate 102. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 2018/0182814 A1 to Kim et al. relates to display including a plurality of pixels having a first pixel, a second pixel and a third pixel, in which a first color filter overlapping the first and second pixels, a second color filter overlapping the first and third pixels, and a third color filter overlapping the second and third pixels. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MIKKA LIU whose telephone number is (571)272-2568. The examiner can normally be reached on 9AM-5AM EST M-F. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eliseo Ramos-Feliciano can be reached on 571-272-7925. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /M.L./Examiner, Art Unit 2817 /ELISEO RAMOS FELICIANO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12701835
LIGHT SOURCE DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701758
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING A FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTOR AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696582
LIGHTING DEVICE AND LAMP COMPRISING SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12690311
Meta-Optics Display Structure for Use With Information Handling Systems
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12667013
METHOD FOR MACHINING A DEVICE AND DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+3.7%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 607 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month