Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/742,718

DIGITAL MULTICHANNEL INTERFACE WITHIN A RADIO DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jun 13, 2024
Priority
Oct 31, 2014 — provisional 62/073,227 +3 more
Examiner
HENEGHAN, MATTHEW E
Art Unit
3992
Tech Center
3900
Assignee
Outdoor Wireless Networks LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
74 granted / 88 resolved
+24.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
104
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
§102
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
§112
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 88 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . For reissue applications filed on or after September 16, 2012, all references to 35 U.S.C. 251 and 37 CFR 1.172, 1.175, and 3.73 are to the current provisions. Reissue Applications The instant application is a broadening reissue of U.S. Patent No. 11,362,728 (hereinafter the ‘728 patent), issued on 14 June 2022. In response to the previous office action, Applicant has amended claims 6, 9, 13, 15, 17, 18, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, and 31 and cancelled claims 26 and 32. Claims 1-25 and 27-31 have been examined. Specifically regarding claims 6 and 18, the claims have been amended from their previous version, but are now the original versions as recited in the ‘728 patent. Applicant is reminded of the continuing obligation under 37 CFR 1.178(b), to timely apprise the Office of any prior or concurrent proceeding in which the ‘728 patent is or was involved. These proceedings would include any trial before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, interferences, reissues, reexaminations, supplemental examinations, and litigation. Applicant is further reminded of the continuing obligation under 37 CFR 1.56, to timely apprise the Office of any information which is material to patentability of the claims under consideration in this reissue application. These obligations rest with each individual associated with the filing and prosecution of this application for reissue. See also MPEP §§ 1404, 1442.01 and 1442.04. Applicant is notified that any subsequent amendment to the specification and/or claims must comply with 37 CFR 1.173(b). In addition, for reissue applications filed before September 16, 2012, when any substantive amendment is filed in the reissue application, which amendment otherwise places the reissue application in condition for allowance, a supplemental oath/declaration will be required. See MPEP § 1414.01. Priority The ‘728 patent was filed on 17 August 2020 as a continuation of Application No. 15/520,792, now U.S. Patent No. 10,749,590 (hereinafter the ‘590 patent), filed on 20 April 2017. The ‘590 patent was the national stage entry of Application PCT/US2015/032674, filed on 27 May 2015. The ‘590 patent also claimed priority to Provisional Patent Application No. 62,073,227, filed on 31 October 2014. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 21-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 21 recites the limitation "a plurality of radio units" in line 6. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim, as this was also recited in the preamble. Claims 22-25 are dependent upon base claim 21 and are likewise rejected. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 and 27-31 are allowed. Claims 21-25 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claims 1 and 9, no art was found that discloses that “frame timing information extracted from the uplink transmit frames,” as per claim 1, “generate… data streams based on frame timing information extracted from the downlink transmit frames,” as per claim 9. Regarding claim 15, no art was found that discloses “generating… a plurality of reformatted wideband downlink I/Q streams… generating downlink transmit frames including the plurality of reformatted wideband downlink I/Q data streams according to the frame timing information included in the framing clock signal.” Regarding claims 21, and 27, no art could be found that discloses the invention in the context of a plurality of data streams such that they also disclose “at least some downlink frames including control information are received separately without any downlink I/Q data multiplexed therein.” All other claims would be allowable based upon their dependence upon allowable claims. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW E HENEGHAN whose telephone number is (571)272-3834. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Fuelling can be reached at (571)270-1367. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW E HENEGHAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3992 Conferees: /Ovidio Escalante/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3992 /M.F/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3992
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 13, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 09, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent RE50902
MEMORY MODULE, ERROR CORRECTION METHOD OF MEMORY CONTROLLER CONTROLLING THE SAME, AND COMPUTING SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent RE50791
BASE STATION, WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AND METHODS FOR OPERATING THE SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent RE50794
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING DROPPED AGGREGATED TRAFFIC METADATA PACKETS
2y 4m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent RE50771
INDICATING OPTICAL PARAMETER GROUPS
5y 0m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent RE50758
Method and Apparatus for Configuring Sounding Signals in a Wireless Communication Network
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+4.0%)
3y 4m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 88 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month