Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/742,974

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 13, 2024
Examiner
ERDEM, FAZLI
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Fuji Electric Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
895 granted / 1050 resolved
+17.2% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1082
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
48.4%
+8.4% vs TC avg
§102
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1050 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
ananDETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 19-38 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Onozawa (20140179441). Regarding Claim 1, in Figs. 1A and 2 and in paragraphs 0019, 0032, 0061, 0066, 0083, 0084, 0088, 0118 and 0121, Onozawa discloses a semiconductor device comprising a semiconductor substrate 1 including an upper surface and a lower surface, wherein the semiconductor substrate includes an n-type semiconductor region 5/15/6/16/7/17/ having a hydrogen containing region, and a carrier concentration distribution representing a carrier concentration by a semi- logarithmic graph in the depth direction of the n-type semiconductor region (Fig. 2) includes: a flat portion (flat portions labeled as “flat portion” around depth 20 and depth 40) which is a substantially flat region and contains a first flat part (first “flat portion” on the left depth around 20 micrometers) and a second flat part (second “flat portion” on the right around depth 40 micrometers), located closer to the lower surface of the semiconductor substrate than the first plat part; and a slope (around element 6a at depth 35) located between the first flat part and the second flat part. Regarding Claim 20, in Fig. 1A, the n-type semiconductor region includes a drift region 2 a carrier concentration of which is lower than that of the hydrogen containing region 5/15/6/16/7/17 Regarding Claim 21, a change of the carrier concentration in the flat portion is within a range of values of +/- 20%. (see paragraphs 0084 and 0088 in conjunction with claim 1 of Onozawa) Regarding Claim 22, a carrier concentration of the first flat part is 80% or more and 120% or less of that of the semiconductor substrate; and a length of the first flat part is within 70% of a thickness of the semiconductor substrate (see paragraphs 0084 and 0088 in conjunction with claim 1 of Onozawa) Regarding Claim 23, in Fig. 1a and 2, the carrier concentration distribution of the hydrogen containing region includes the second flat part Regarding Claim 24, the carrier concentration distribution of the drift region includes the first flat part (see paragraphs 0032, 0083 and 0118) Regarding Clam 25, the carrier concentration distribution of the hydrogen containing region 5/15/6/16/7/17 includes the slope (the region around element 6a in Fig. 2). Regarding Claim 26, the slope (the region around element 6a) includes an upward convex shape. Regarding Claim 27, the carrier concentration distribution includes at least one peak 5a/7a that is closer to the lower surface than the slope 6a. Regarding Claim 28, the second flat part is located between the slope 6a and the at least one peak 5a/7a. Regarding Claim 29, a carrier concentration of the second flat part is lower than a carrier concentration of a half-value of the at least one peak (see paragraphs 0069 and 0087). Regarding Claim 30, a length between the at least one peak and an end point located closest to the lower surface among points at which the carrier concentration is constant in the depth direction of the second flat part is smaller than a length of the flat portion (see paragraph 0070) Regarding Claim 31, a gradient at the end point is substantially zero (see paragraphs 0069 and 0087) Regarding Claim 32, the end point is an end point of a high concentration region in which a carrier concentration is higher than a virtual carrier concentration (see paragraphs 0097, 0103, 0104, 0121) Regarding Claim 33, the at least one peak 5a/6a/7a is located closest to the drift region in the hydrogen containing region. Regarding Claim 34, the second flat part includes the at least one peak that is flattened, and a full width at half maximum of the flattened peak is 5 m or more (see paragraph 0069) Regarding Claim 35, the second flat part includes the at least one peak that is flattened, and a full width at half maximum of the flattened peak is 10 m or more (see paragraph 0069) Regarding Claim 36, the second flat part includes the at least one peak that is flattened, and a full width at half maximum of the flattened peak is 15 m or more (see paragraph 0069). Regarding Claim 37, the second flat part further includes one or more other peaks 5a/6a/7a. Regarding Claim 38, the second flat part includes a local maximum value corresponding to the at least one peak and a local minimum value which corresponding to a valley in a range of values of +/-20% within which a change of the carrier concentration in the flat portion is (see paragraphs 0084 and 0088 in conjunction with claim 1 of Onozawa). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FAZLI ERDEM whose telephone number is (571)272-1914. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Davienne Monbleau can be reached at 571-272-1945. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FAZLI ERDEM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812 3/12/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 18, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593563
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593631
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588498
FINFET STRUCTURE WITH CONTROLLED AIR GAPS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581679
SPLIT-GATE POWER MOS DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581877
SELECTIVE DEPOSITION OF METAL OXIDES USING SILANES AS AN INHIBITOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.9%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1050 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month