DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Response to Amendment
The amendment filed April 23rd, 2026 has been entered. Claims 1-11 remain pending in the application. The amendments to the drawings, specification, and claims have overcome each and every drawing objection, specification objection, and 112(b) rejection previously cited previously cited in the Non-Final rejection mailed February 13th, 2026. However, the amendment has raised other issues detailed below.
Response to Arguments
Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim 1 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument.
Applicant's arguments filed April 23rd, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive.
Applicant argues on Pg. 8-9 (as numbered by the Applicant) of the Remarks, “The examiner interprets "connecting tool" as invoking 35 USC 112(f) - means-plus function. Applicant respectfully submits that the connecting tool, does not recite "means" and is therefore presumed to not be a means-plus-function term. Furthermore, applicant submits that the connecting tool of claim 2 is a structural feature and should be interpreted as such in light of the specification. Applicant submits that the word ''tool" is not a nonce word like "module" or "unit." Rather, the word "tool" is not generic in the same way as "module" and it has a recognized meaning in both mechanical and software arts. Specifically, the word "tool" denotes a class of implements used to achieve a physical or logical connection.” However, this argument is not persuasive as the Examiner maintains the term “tool” is generic as one of the accepted meanings is “a means to an end” which not a structural or defining structure and is therefore a nonce term in the manner claimed since it has been held the Examiner must carefully consider the term in light of the specification and the commonly accepted meaning in the technological art (MPEP 211, Section I, Paragraph A).
The rejection of dependent claim 1 is maintained. The rejections of dependent claims 2-7 are also maintained for at least the reasons described herein. See the rejections of new claims 8-11 below.
Claim Interpretation
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(f):
(f) Element in Claim for a Combination. – An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof.
The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph:
An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof.
The claims in this application are given their broadest reasonable interpretation using the plain meaning of the claim language in light of the specification as it would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. The broadest reasonable interpretation of a claim element (also commonly referred to as a claim limitation) is limited by the description in the specification when 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is invoked.
As explained in MPEP § 2181, subsection I, claim limitations that meet the following three-prong test will be interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph:
(A) the claim limitation uses the term “means” or “step” or a term used as a substitute for “means” that is a generic placeholder (also called a nonce term or a non-structural term having no specific structural meaning) for performing the claimed function;
(B) the term “means” or “step” or the generic placeholder is modified by functional language, typically, but not always linked by the transition word “for” (e.g., “means for”) or another linking word or phrase, such as “configured to” or “so that”; and
(C) the term “means” or “step” or the generic placeholder is not modified by sufficient structure, material, or acts for performing the claimed function.
Use of the word “means” (or “step”) in a claim with functional language creates a rebuttable presumption that the claim limitation is to be treated in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. The presumption that the claim limitation is interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is rebutted when the claim limitation recites sufficient structure, material, or acts to entirely perform the recited function.
Absence of the word “means” (or “step”) in a claim creates a rebuttable presumption that the claim limitation is not to be treated in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. The presumption that the claim limitation is not interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is rebutted when the claim limitation recites function without reciting sufficient structure, material or acts to entirely perform the recited function.
Claim limitations in this application that use the word “means” (or “step”) are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, except as otherwise indicated in an Office action. Conversely, claim limitations in this application that do not use the word “means” (or “step”) are not being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, except as otherwise indicated in an Office action.
This application includes one or more claim limitations that do not use the word “means,” but are nonetheless being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, because the claim limitation(s) uses a generic placeholder that is coupled with functional language without reciting sufficient structure to perform the recited function and the generic placeholder is not preceded by a structural modifier. Such claim limitation(s) is/are:
“Connecting tool” in line 3 of claim 2 draws corresponding structure from the following recitation of the specification, “For example, the connecting tool 58 may be a screw, a fastening part such as a bolt and a nut, or other appropriate removable connecting parts (Pg. 22, paragraph 51)”, or equivalents.
Because this/these claim limitation(s) is/are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, it/they is/are being interpreted to cover the corresponding structure described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof.
If applicant does not intend to have this/these limitation(s) interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, applicant may: (1) amend the claim limitation(s) to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph (e.g., by reciting sufficient structure to perform the claimed function); or (2) present a sufficient showing that the claim limitation(s) recite(s) sufficient structure to perform the claimed function so as to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows:
1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness.
Claims 1, 4-5, 9, and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nakashima (US Patent No. 10,174,974), hereinafter Nakashima in view of Nobori et al. (JP 2000039183), hereinafter Nobori.
Regarding claim 1, Nakashima discloses a cryocooler compressor (Fig. 1, compressor 1 specifically the components inside of the box identified as compressor 1) comprising:
a compressor casing that includes a front panel (See annotated Fig. 1 of Nakashima below, compressor casing 1A, front panel 1b), and
a pipe connection (Fig. 1, cooling water pipe connection 1);
a port to which a refrigerant gas pipe for a cold head is connected, and a cold heat connector to which an electric wire for supplying power to the cold heat is connected (Fig. 1, pipes 7, power cable 8; Col. 2, lines 45-58, The pipes 7 are connected to the expander 10 and the compressor 1 and circulate a refrigerant gas between the expander 10 and the compressor 1. The pipes 7 include a low-pressure pipe 7a and a high-pressure pipe 7b. A low-pressure refrigerant gas flowing from the expander 10 to the compressor 1 flows in the low-pressure pipe 7a. On the other hand, a high-pressure refrigerant gas flowing from the compressor 1 to the expander 10 flows in the high-pressure pipe 7b. The pressure sensor 70 measures the pressure of a refrigerant gas flowing in the pipes 7. The power cable 8 is connected to the compressor 1 and the expander 10. The power cable 8 is used to supply, from the compressor 1, electrical power that serves as power for the expander 10).
However, Nakashima does not disclose a control panel; and
the compressor casing to accommodate the control panel,
wherein the front panel includes a first panel portion that provides the pipe connection, and a second panel portion that is removably connected to the first panel portion and on which the control panel is mounted.
Nobori teaches a control panel (Fig. 1, outdoor control section 20i, control box 40a); and
the compressor casing to accommodate the control panel (Fig. 1 of Nobori depicts the outdoor control section 20i and control box 40a to be accommodated inside of the housing 20a),
wherein the front panel includes a first panel portion that provides the pipe connection, and a second panel portion that is removably connected to the first panel portion and on which the control panel is mounted (See annotated Fig. 1 of Nobori below, first panel portion 1b’ is provided with connection potion 30a and removeable service panel 40 includes control box 40a which contains control section 20i).
Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the cryocooler compressor of Nakashima to include a control panel accommodated in the compressor casing wherein the front panel includes a first panel portion that provides the pipe connection, and a second panel portion that is removably connected to the first panel portion and on which the control panel is mounted as taught by Nobori. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification to enable a service work such as a repair and maintenance work to be easily carried out (Nobori, Abstract).
However, Nakashima as modified does not explicitly wherein the first panel portion comprises the port to which the refrigerant gas pipe for the cold head is connected, and the second panel portion comprise the cold head connector to which the electric wire for supplying power to the cold heat is connected.
Nakashima teaches the use of refrigerant gas pipes and the cold head connector connected to the electric wire for connecting flow of fluid and electricity between the compressor casing and the cold head (Nakashima, Fig. 1, pipes 7, power cable 8; Col. 2, lines 45-58, The pipes 7 are connected to the expander 10 and the compressor 1 and circulate a refrigerant gas between the expander 10 and the compressor 1. The pipes 7 include a low-pressure pipe 7a and a high-pressure pipe 7b. A low-pressure refrigerant gas flowing from the expander 10 to the compressor 1 flows in the low-pressure pipe 7a. On the other hand, a high-pressure refrigerant gas flowing from the compressor 1 to the expander 10 flows in the high-pressure pipe 7b. The pressure sensor 70 measures the pressure of a refrigerant gas flowing in the pipes 7. The power cable 8 is connected to the compressor 1 and the expander 10. The power cable 8 is used to supply, from the compressor 1, electrical power that serves as power for the expander 10).
Further, it is noted there are only a finite number of ways to arrange a refrigerant gas pipe, a cold head connector with and the cold head connector connected to the electric wire for connecting flow of fluid and electricity between the compressor casing and the cold head between the first panel portion and the second panel portion. The following finite arrangements including: both the refrigerant gas pipe and the cold head connector located on the first panel portion, both the refrigerant gas pipe and the cold head connector located on the second panel portion, the refrigerant gas pipe located on the first panel portion and the and the cold head connector located on the second panel portion, or the refrigerant gas pipe located on the second panel portion and the and the cold head connector located on the first panel portion. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify cryocooler compressor wherein the first panel portion comprises the port to which the refrigerant gas pipe for the cold head is connected, and the second panel portion comprise the cold head connector to which the electric wire for supplying power to the cold heat is connected to enable a service work such as a repair and maintenance work to be easily carried out (Nobori, Abstract).
PNG
media_image1.png
593
878
media_image1.png
Greyscale
Annotated Fig. 1 of Nakashima
PNG
media_image2.png
288
310
media_image2.png
Greyscale
Annotated Fig. 1 of Nobori
Regarding claim 4, Nakashima as modified discloses the cryocooler compressor according to claim 1 (see the combination of references used in the rejection of claim 1 above),
wherein the control panel is capable of being extracted forward from the compressor casing together with the second panel portion (Nobori, Pg. 5, In other words, according to the air conditioner 1 and the outdoor unit 20 of the present embodiment, the service panel 40 is pulled out in the direction of the arrow in FIG. The control box section 40a can be pulled out at the same time, so that the outdoor control section 20i can be easily inspected). Further, the limitations of claim 4 are the result of the modification of references used in the rejection of claim 1 above.
Regarding claim 5, Nakashima as modified discloses the cryocooler compressor according to claim 4 (see the combination of references used in the rejection of claim 4 above),
wherein the compressor casing includes a bottom panel, and a caster fixation portion which is provided at an upper surface end portion of the bottom panel (See annotated Fig. 1 of Nakashima below, bottom panel 1c, caster fixation portion A is provided at an upper surface end portion of the bottom panel 1c), and
wherein a width of a bottom surface of the control panel is narrower than a width of the second panel portion such that the control panel is extracted forward from the compressor casing together with the second panel portion without interfering with the caster fixation portion (See Fig. 2 of Nobori, the entirety of the control section 20i, including its bottom surface, is depicted to be narrower than a width of the removeable service panel 40 such that the control panel is extracted forward from the compressor casing together with the second panel portion without interfering with the caster fixation portion). Further, the limitations of claim 5 are the result of the modification of references used in the rejection of claim 4 above.
PNG
media_image1.png
593
878
media_image1.png
Greyscale
Annotated Fig. 1 of Nakashima
PNG
media_image3.png
317
278
media_image3.png
Greyscale
Annotated Fig. 2 of Nobori
Regarding claim 9, Nakashima as modified discloses the cryocooler compressor according to claim 1 (see the combination of references used in the rejection of claim 1 above),
wherein the first panel portion and the second panel portion are adjacent to each other in an up-down direction in front view, and are combined with each other to form the front panel (See annotated Fig. 1 of Nobori below, first panel portion 1b’ and removeable service panel 40 are depicted to be adjected to each other in an up-down direction and are combined with each other to form the front panel). Further, the limitations of claim 9 are the result of the modification of references used in the rejection of claim 1 above.
PNG
media_image2.png
288
310
media_image2.png
Greyscale
Annotated Fig. 1 of Nobori
Regarding claim 11, Nakashima discloses a cryocooler compressor (Fig. 1, compressor 1 specifically the components inside of the box identified as compressor 1) comprising:
a compressor casing that includes a front panel (See annotated Fig. 1 of Nakashima below, compressor casing 1A, front panel 1b), and
a pipe connection (Fig. 1, cooling water pipe connection 1).
However, Nakashima does not disclose a control panel; and
the compressor casing to accommodate the control panel,
wherein the front panel includes a first panel portion that provides the pipe connection, and a second panel portion that is removably connected to the first panel portion and on which the control panel is mounted,
wherein the first panel portion and the second panel portion are adjacent to each other in a left-right direction or an up-down direction in front view, and are combined with each other to form the front panel
Nobori teaches a control panel (Fig. 1, outdoor control section 20i, control box 40a); and
the compressor casing to accommodate the control panel (Fig. 1 of Nobori depicts the outdoor control section 20i and control box 40a to be accommodated inside of the housing 20a),
wherein the front panel includes a first panel portion that provides the pipe connection, and a second panel portion that is removably connected to the first panel portion and on which the control panel is mounted (See annotated Fig. 1 of Nobori below, first panel portion 1b’ is provided with connection potion 30a and removeable service panel 40 includes control box 40a which contains control section 20i),
wherein the first panel portion and the second panel portion are adjacent to each other in an up-down direction in front view, and are combined with each other to form the front panel (See annotated Fig. 1 of Nobori below, first panel portion 1b’ and removeable service panel 40 are depicted to be adjected to each other in an up-down direction and are combined with each other to form the front panel).
Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the cryocooler compressor of Nakashima to include a control panel accommodated in the compressor casing wherein the front panel includes a first panel portion that provides the pipe connection, and a second panel portion that is removably connected to the first panel portion and on which the control panel is mounted wherein the first panel portion and the second panel portion are adjacent to each other in an up-down direction in front view, and are combined with each other to form the front panel as taught by Nobori. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification to enable a service work such as a repair and maintenance work to be easily carried out (Nobori, Abstract).
PNG
media_image1.png
593
878
media_image1.png
Greyscale
Annotated Fig. 1 of Nakashima
PNG
media_image2.png
288
310
media_image2.png
Greyscale
Annotated Fig. 1 of Nobori
Claims 2-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nakashima as modified by Nobori as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Large (US Patent No. 4,577,450), hereinafter Large.
Regarding claim 2, Nakashima as modified discloses the cryocooler compressor according to claim 1 (see the combination of references used in the rejection of claim 1 above),
wherein the second panel portion is removably connected to the first panel portion by a connecting tool (Nobori, Pg. 5, the service panel 40 is formed integrally with a control box section 40a that houses the outdoor control section 20i. It is detachably attached to the housing 20a by screws or the like).
However, Nakashima as modified does not disclose the first panel portion includes an opening portion for enabling access to the connecting tool from an outside of the compressor casing.
Large teaches the first panel portion includes an opening portion for enabling access to the connecting tool from an outside of the panel (Fig. 4, float space 94, tubular cup 48, bolt 60, portion 32a, upper plate 12, lower plate 14, panel 10).
Nakashima as modified fails to teach the first panel portion includes an opening portion for enabling access to the connecting tool from an outside of the compressor casing, however Large teaches that it is a known method in the art of joining panels to include an opening portion for enabling access to the connecting tool from an outside of the panel. This is strong evidence that modifying Nakashima as modified as claimed would produce predictable results (i.e. to provide a clean aesthetic with no visible fasteners). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Nakashima as modified by Large and arrive at the claimed invention since all claimed elements were known in the art and one having ordinary skill in the art could have combined the elements as claimed by known methods with no changes in their respective functions and the combination would have yielded the predictable result of to provide a clean aesthetic with no visible fasteners.
Regarding claim 3, Nakashima as modified discloses the cryocooler compressor according to claim 2 (see the combination of references used in the rejection of claim 2 above), wherein the first panel portion includes a first panel side surface to which the connecting tool is attached, and a second panel side surface including the opening portion (Large, Fig. 4, float space 94, tubular cup 48, bolt 60, portion 32a, upper plate 12, lower plate 14, panel 10). Further, the limitations of claim 3 are the result of the modification of references used in the rejection of claim 2 above.
Claims 6-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nakashima as modified by Nobori as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Townsend (US 20160116194), hereinafter Townsend.
Regarding claim 6, Nakashima as modified discloses the cryocooler compressor according to claim 1 (see the combination of references used in the rejection of claim 1 above), further comprising:
a plurality of electric components accommodated in the compressor casing (Nobori, Pg. 4, The outdoor control unit 20i includes the propeller fan 20c, the compressor 20f, and the other outdoor unit 20. It performs operation control and the like, and is composed of various electric circuit elements).
However, as modified does not disclose wherein the control panel includes a plurality of connectors connected to the plurality of electric components on a back surface of the control panel.
Townsend teaches wherein the control panel includes a plurality of connectors connected to the plurality of electric components on a back surface of the control panel (Fig. 11, control panel 180, switches 184, connection wires 190; Pg. 5, paragraph 52, The timer 188 can be connected to the control panel 180, including switches 184, via one or more connection wires 190. The connection wires 190 can connect the timer 188 to one or more power sources and/or to the motor 162, blower 144 and/or pump 134).
Nakashima as modified fails to teach wherein the control panel includes a plurality of connectors connected to the plurality of electric components on a back surface of the control panel, however Townsend teaches that it is a known method in the art of control panels to include wherein the control panel includes a plurality of connectors connected to the plurality of electric components on a back surface of the control panel. This is strong evidence that modifying Nakashima as modified as claimed would produce predictable results (i.e. providing wire management to reduce clutter and improve electrical safety of the system). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Nakashima as modified by Townsend and arrive at the claimed invention since all claimed elements were known in the art and one having ordinary skill in the art could have combined the elements as claimed by known methods with no changes in their respective functions and the combination would have yielded the predictable result of providing wire management to reduce clutter and improve electrical safety of the system.
Regarding claim 7, Nakashima as modified discloses the cryocooler compressor according to claim 6 (see the combination of references used in the rejection of claim 6 above), wherein the plurality of connectors are collectively disposed at a specific location on the back surface of the control panel (Fig. 11 of Townsend depicts the switches 184 to be collectively disposed at a specific location on the back surface of the control panel 180). Further, the limitations of claim 7 are the result of the modification of references used in the rejection of claim 6 above.
Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nakashima as modified by Nobori as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Hirawa et al. (US Patent No. 11,428,421), hereinafter Hirawa.
Regarding claim 8, Nakashima as modified discloses the cryocooler compressor according to claim 1 (see the combination of references used in the rejection of claim 1 above).
However, Nakashima as modified does not explicitly disclose wherein the first panel portion includes a first panel side surface, and a second panel side surface opposite to the first panel side surface of the first panel portion, and
the second panel portion includes a first panel side surface, and a second panel side surface opposite to the first panel side surface of the second panel portion,
wherein the first panel side surface of the first panel portion and the first panel side surface of the second panel portion are in contact with each other and are removably connected to each other.
Hirawa teaches wherein the first panel portion includes a first panel side surface, and a second panel side surface opposite to the first panel side surface of the first panel portion (Fig. 4, front panel 24, first panel 24a, end part 245 is depicted to be opposite first flange 243), and
the second panel portion includes a first panel side surface, and a second panel side surface opposite to the first panel side surface of the second panel portion (Fig. 4, front panel 24, second panel 24b, end part 246 is depicted to be opposite the second flange 244),
wherein the first panel side surface of the first panel portion and the first panel side surface of the second panel portion are in contact with each other and are removably connected to each other (Col. 8, lines 26-38, The second panel 24b is attached to the casing 2 before the first panel 24a. When the first panel 24a is attached, the first panel 24a and the second panel 24b overlap in the panel thickness direction in such a manner that the second flange 244 of the second panel 24b is on an inner side and the first flange 243 of the first panel 24a is on a front side. This overlapping region is referred to as an overlapping region 240. The overlapping region 240 extends vertically downward from an upper end of the front panel 24, descends smoothly obliquely downward to the right on the way, and then extends vertically downward).
Nakashima as modified fails to teach wherein the first panel portion includes a first panel side surface, and a second panel side surface opposite to the first panel side surface of the first panel portion, and the second panel portion includes a first panel side surface, and a second panel side surface opposite to the first panel side surface of the second panel portion, wherein the first panel side surface of the first panel portion and the first panel side surface of the second panel portion are in contact with each other and are removably connected to each other, however Hirawa teaches that it is a known method in the art of compressor casings to include wherein the first panel portion includes a first panel side surface, and a second panel side surface opposite to the first panel side surface of the first panel portion, and the second panel portion includes a first panel side surface, and a second panel side surface opposite to the first panel side surface of the second panel portion, wherein the first panel side surface of the first panel portion and the first panel side surface of the second panel portion are in contact with each other and are removably connected to each other. This is strong evidence that modifying Nakashima as modified as claimed would produce predictable results (i.e. the service person can access the electric component box only by detaching the first panel, which is part of the front panel. The present invention reduces workload of the service person, and is generally useful for the outdoor unit (Hirawa, Col. 12, lines 15-18)). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Nakashima as modified by Hirawa and arrive at the claimed invention since all claimed elements were known in the art and one having ordinary skill in the art could have combined the elements as claimed by known methods with no changes in their respective functions and the combination would have yielded the predictable result of the service person can access the electric component box only by detaching the first panel, which is part of the front panel. The present invention reduces workload of the service person, and is generally useful for the outdoor unit (Hirawa, Col. 12, lines 15-18).
Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nakashima (US Patent No. 10,174,974), hereinafter Nakashima in view of Nobori et al. (JP 2000039183), hereinafter Nobori and Hirawa et al. (US Patent No. 11,428,421), hereinafter Hirawa.
Regarding claim 10, Nakashima discloses a cryocooler compressor (Fig. 1, compressor 1 specifically the components inside of the box identified as compressor 1) comprising:
a compressor casing that includes a front panel (See annotated Fig. 1 of Nakashima below, compressor casing 1A, front panel 1b), and
a pipe connection (Fig. 1, cooling water pipe connection 1).
However, Nakashima does not disclose a control panel; and
the compressor casing to accommodate the control panel,
wherein the front panel includes a first panel portion that provides the pipe connection, and a second panel portion that is removably connected to the first panel portion and on which the control panel is mounted.
Nobori teaches a control panel (Fig. 1, outdoor control section 20i, control box 40a); and
the compressor casing to accommodate the control panel (Fig. 1 of Nobori depicts the outdoor control section 20i and control box 40a to be accommodated inside of the housing 20a),
wherein the front panel includes a first panel portion that provides the pipe connection, and a second panel portion that is removably connected to the first panel portion and on which the control panel is mounted (See annotated Fig. 1 of Nobori below, first panel portion 1b’ is provided with connection potion 30a and removeable service panel 40 includes control box 40a which contains control section 20i).
Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the cryocooler compressor of Nakashima to include a control panel accommodated in the compressor casing wherein the front panel includes a first panel portion that provides the pipe connection, and a second panel portion that is removably connected to the first panel portion and on which the control panel is mounted as taught by Nobori. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification to enable a service work such as a repair and maintenance work to be easily carried out (Nobori, Abstract).
However, Nakashima as modified does not explicitly disclose wherein the first panel portion includes a first panel side surface, and a second panel side surface opposite to the first panel side surface of the first panel portion, and the second panel portion includes a first panel side surface, and a second panel side surface opposite to the first panel side surface of the second panel portion,
wherein the first panel side surface of the first panel portion and the first panel side surface of the second panel portion are in contact with each other and are removably connected to each other.
Hirawa teaches wherein the first panel portion includes a first panel side surface, and a second panel side surface opposite to the first panel side surface of the first panel portion (Fig. 4, front panel 24, first panel 24a, end part 245 is depicted to be opposite first flange 243), and the second panel portion includes a first panel side surface, and a second panel side surface opposite to the first panel side surface of the second panel portion (Fig. 4, front panel 24, second panel 24b, end part 246 is depicted to be opposite the second flange 244),
wherein the first panel side surface of the first panel portion and the first panel side surface of the second panel portion are in contact with each other and are removably connected to each other (Col. 8, lines 26-38, The second panel 24b is attached to the casing 2 before the first panel 24a. When the first panel 24a is attached, the first panel 24a and the second panel 24b overlap in the panel thickness direction in such a manner that the second flange 244 of the second panel 24b is on an inner side and the first flange 243 of the first panel 24a is on a front side. This overlapping region is referred to as an overlapping region 240. The overlapping region 240 extends vertically downward from an upper end of the front panel 24, descends smoothly obliquely downward to the right on the way, and then extends vertically downward).
Nakashima as modified fails to teach wherein the first panel portion includes a first panel side surface, and a second panel side surface opposite to the first panel side surface of the first panel portion, and the second panel portion includes a first panel side surface, and a second panel side surface opposite to the first panel side surface of the second panel portion, wherein the first panel side surface of the first panel portion and the first panel side surface of the second panel portion are in contact with each other and are removably connected to each other, however Hirawa teaches that it is a known method in the art of compressor casings to include wherein the first panel portion includes a first panel side surface, and a second panel side surface opposite to the first panel side surface of the first panel portion, and the second panel portion includes a first panel side surface, and a second panel side surface opposite to the first panel side surface of the second panel portion, wherein the first panel side surface of the first panel portion and the first panel side surface of the second panel portion are in contact with each other and are removably connected to each other. This is strong evidence that modifying Nakashima as modified as claimed would produce predictable results (i.e. the service person can access the electric component box only by detaching the first panel, which is part of the front panel. The present invention reduces workload of the service person, and is generally useful for the outdoor unit (Hirawa, Col. 12, lines 15-18)). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Nakashima as modified by Hirawa and arrive at the claimed invention since all claimed elements were known in the art and one having ordinary skill in the art could have combined the elements as claimed by known methods with no changes in their respective functions and the combination would have yielded the predictable result of the service person can access the electric component box only by detaching the first panel, which is part of the front panel. The present invention reduces workload of the service person, and is generally useful for the outdoor unit (Hirawa, Col. 12, lines 15-18).
PNG
media_image1.png
593
878
media_image1.png
Greyscale
Annotated Fig. 1 of Nakashima
PNG
media_image2.png
288
310
media_image2.png
Greyscale
Annotated Fig. 1 of Nobori
Conclusion
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DEVON T MOORE whose telephone number is 571-272-6555. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 7:30-5.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Frantz Jules can be reached at 571-272-6681. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/DEVON MOORE/Examiner, Art Unit 3763 July 13th, 2026
/FRANTZ F JULES/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Prosecution Insights