Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/743,655

APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SECURING A DECK OR ROOF STRUCTURE TO A BRICK OR SIDING VENEERED BUILDING STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 14, 2024
Examiner
MINTZ, RODNEY K
Art Unit
3635
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
735 granted / 932 resolved
+26.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
950
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
33.1%
-6.9% vs TC avg
§102
20.9%
-19.1% vs TC avg
§112
31.9%
-8.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 932 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Claims 1-6 are pending. Claims 1-4 are subject to examination in this Office action. Claims 5 and 6 are withdrawn (non-elected). Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention I (claims 1-4) in the reply filed on 2 February 2026 is acknowledged. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 06/14/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement has been considered by the Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as anticipated by Carlson (U.S. Patent No. 804,451). Regarding independent claim 1, Carlson describes a joist or beam hanger comprising: a metal joist or beam end bracket (Figs. 1-4) consisting of a pair of parallel spaced vertical side plates (2, 2) joined together with a vertical back end plate (4, 4) and further including a bottom plate (1) to thereby form a joist or beam end support pocket (Figs. 1-4); said vertical back end plate including multiple vertically spaced apertures (Figs. 1-4) for receiving lag bolts to secure said bracket to a building structure, a metal sill rest support flange (unlabeled support flange positioned underneath bearing-flanges 3; Fig. 1) adjustably securable (via 3) to said vertical back end plate at multiple different vertical positions and having a portion thereof horizontally extending from said vertical back end plate away from said pocket and vertically pre-positioned on said vertical back end plate for resting on a wall sill plate or wall top plate of said building structure when said bracket is secured to said building structure (Fig. 1); and at least one of said vertically spaced apertures positioned to receive one of said lag bolts in said wall sill plate or wall top plate (Fig. 1). Regarding claim 2, wherein said sill rest support flange is L-shaped having a vertical lip end portion that is securable to said vertical back end plate (Fig. 1). Regarding claim 3, wherein a portion of said sill rest support flange extends through one of multiple vertically spaced horizontal slots provided in said vertical back end plate, and said vertical lip end portion is secured to said vertical back end plate with one or more of said lag bolts (Fig. 1). Regarding claim 4, wherein said vertical lip end portion is welded to said vertical back end plate (Fig. 1). Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as anticipated by Denn (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0100796). Regarding independent claim 1, Denn describes a joist or beam hanger comprising: a metal joist or beam end bracket (40; see e.g., Figs. 7A-7C) consisting of a pair of parallel spaced vertical side plates (46, 46) joined together with a vertical back end plate (43) and further including a bottom plate (45) to thereby form a joist or beam end support pocket; said vertical back end plate including multiple vertically spaced apertures (48) for receiving lag bolts to secure said bracket to a building structure, a metal sill rest support flange (70, 72) adjustably securable (via 38) to said vertical back end plate at multiple different vertical positions and having a portion thereof horizontally extending from said vertical back end plate away from said pocket and vertically pre-positioned on said vertical back end plate for resting on a wall sill plate or wall top plate of said building structure when said bracket is secured to said building structure (see e.g., Figs. 7A-7C); and at least one of said vertically spaced apertures positioned to receive one of said lag bolts in said wall sill plate or wall top plate (see e.g., Figs. 7A-7C). Regarding claim 2, wherein said sill rest support flange is L-shaped having a vertical lip end portion that is securable to said vertical back end plate (see e.g., Figs. 7A-7C). Regarding claim 3, wherein a portion of said sill rest support flange extends through one of multiple vertically spaced horizontal slots provided in said vertical back end plate, and said vertical lip end portion is secured to said vertical back end plate with one or more of said lag bolts (see e.g., Figs. 7A-7C). Regarding claim 4, wherein said vertical lip end portion is welded to said vertical back end plate (see e.g., Figs. 7A-7C). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to Applicant’s disclosure: Refer to the attached Form PTO-892. Authorization for Email Communication – In the event Applicant wishes to communicate with the Examiner via electronic mail, written authorization should be provided in Applicant’s next response. See MPEP § 502.03. The following is a sample authorization form which may be used by Applicant: Recognizing that Internet communications are not secure, we hereby authorize the USPTO to communicate with any authorized representative concerning any subject matter of this application by electronic mail. We understand that a copy of these communications will be made of record in the application file. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RODNEY MINTZ whose telephone number is (571)270-7327. The examiner can normally be reached on M-Th 0730 - 1630 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Mattei can be reached on 571-270-3238. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RODNEY MINTZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3635
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 14, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 26, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601218
SHUTTER ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601167
TRANSPORTABLE EXPANDABLE STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601172
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SECTIONAL CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLY FOR USE WITH A WOOD MULLION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601171
PLASTIC BUILDING BLOCKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590457
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MOUNTING A PANEL TO AN INTERNAL FRAME OF A MODULAR WALL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+11.1%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 932 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month