Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/744,322

PROGRAMMABLE TEST COMPRESSION ARCHITECTURE INPUT/OUTPUT SHIFT REGISTER

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jun 14, 2024
Priority
Jun 11, 2009 — provisional 61/186,117 +12 more
Examiner
BRITT, CYNTHIA H
Art Unit
2111
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Texas Instruments Incorporated
OA Round
2 (Final)
95%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 95% — above average
95%
Career Allowance Rate
939 granted / 987 resolved
+40.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+1.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 12m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
996
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
§103
32.6%
-7.4% vs TC avg
§102
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
§112
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 987 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-20 remain pending in the present application. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Response to Arguments Based on the amendment to claims 5 and 14 the 35 U.S.C. § 112 rejections pertaining to the ‘masking circuit’ have been withdrawn. Applicant's arguments filed 2/28/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. As per applicant’s arguments pertaining to the 35 U.S.C. § 112 rejections pertaining to terminology in claim language that is not used in the specification. As applicant has pointed out which items were intended to be representative in the specification, the examiner suggests applicant use the terminology from the specification in the claims. Examiner respectfully reminds Applicant that claim language should be consistent with Applicant's original disclosure. (see 37 CFR 1.75 (a), (d) (1) The claim or claims must conform to the invention as set forth in the remainder of the specification and the terms and phrases used in the claims must find clear support or antecedent basis in the description so that the meaning of the terms in the claims may be ascertainable by reference to the description). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Examiner respectfully notes that Applicant’s disclosure does not appear to include language which can be readily mapped to the claimed features. For example, the disclosure does not appear to include the terms "compressor" (claims 1, 5, 6, 12, 14, 16 and 19), "first shift register" (claims 1-3, 14 and 15), or "second shift register" (claims 1, 3, 14 and 15). While it appears that applicant is attempting to claim features of Figure 6 the used terminology is not consistent with the detailed description. Claims 3, 4, and 15 recite “external interface” also not mentioned in the specification, although there are mentions of an external tester. Claims 2-13 and 15-20 depend either directly or indirectly on the independent claims 1 and 14 rejected above and as such inherit the 35 U.S.C. 112 issues of the parent claims. Therefore these claims are rejected for the same reasoning. Clarification of the claim language is required in order to perform a proper search and comparison with the prior arts, and to understand the claim language with respect to the present specification. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20070260953 to Armagnat teach decompression means receiving the test input data, and compression means at the output of the tested part (Fig 3-4). US 7818644 to Rajski et al teaches a compactor architecture (an X-Press compactor architecture) comprising a first test response compactor and a second test response compactor in an embedded deterministic test environment having n scan chains. Compressed test stimuli can be provided to the scan chains via a decompressor through one or more input channels (or input paths). These channels can also be used in conjunction with input channels to deliver mask bits. US 7487419 to Mukherjee et al. circuit includes a decompressor configured to receive compressed test pattern data on one or more input pins, decompress the compressed test pattern into decompressed test pattern data, and output the decompressed test pattern data to the one or more boundary scan cells and to the one or more internal scan chains of the circuit-under-test. The circuit can also include a compactor configured to receive test response data from the one or more boundary scan cells and from the one or more internal scan chains of the circuit-under-test, compress the test response data into compacted test response data, and output the compacted test response data on one or more output pins. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CYNTHIA H BRITT whose telephone number is (571)272-3815. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Featherstone can be reached at (571)270-3750. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. CYNTHIA H. BRITT Primary Examiner Art Unit 2111 /CYNTHIA BRITT/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2111
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 14, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 28, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681085
INFIELD PERIODIC DEVICE TESTING WHILE MAINTAINING HOST CONNECTIVITY
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676636
COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND COMMUNICATION METHOD
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12670965
NON-LINEAR MEMORY FAILURE ANALYSIS METHOD AND MEMORY TEST APPARATUS
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671526
POLAR CODE ENCODING METHOD, POLAR CODE DECODING METHOD, AND APPARATUSES THEREOF
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12656397
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT WITH MULTIPLEXER FOR TESTING
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
95%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+1.9%)
1y 12m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 987 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month