Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/744,884

METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR VAPOR PRESSURE MONITORING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 17, 2024
Priority
Jun 20, 2023 — provisional 63/522,103
Examiner
PLUMB, NIGEL H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
ASM IP Holding B.V.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
620 granted / 684 resolved
+30.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+1.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
705
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
64.1%
+24.1% vs TC avg
§102
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 684 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Carpenter et al US7090727 (hereinafter “Carpenter”) in view of Fondurulia et al US8986456 (hereinafter “Fondurulia”). Regarding claim 1, Carpenter discloses an apparatus (chamber-200), comprising: a gas line (vapor delivery path-207 formed in part by bore-252); a metal body (portion-258) surrounding a segment of the gas line (See fig 4A), wherein the metal body comprises: a heater rod (heating device-238) within the metal body (Col 6 line 22-67, Fig 3); and a first thermocouple (temperature sensing device-250) connected to the metal body; and an insulator (insulation-213) surrounding a portion of the metal body (Col 8 line 14-20). However, Carpenter fails to disclose a heater rod embedded within the metal body. Fondurulia discloses a heater rod (heating assembly-460) embedded within the metal body (base-402). (See Col 13 line 31-36 and Col 15 line 8-27, Figs 11H) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to include the design of Fondurulia into Carpenter for the purpose of creating a more efficient device. The modification would allow for increased conductive heating transfer. Regarding claim 2, Carpenter in view of Fondurulia disclose the apparatus according to claim 1. Furthermore, Carpenter discloses a portion of the heater rod (heating device-238) extends outside the metal body (portion-258). (Col 6 line 21-54, Fig 3-4B) Regarding claim 3, Carpenter in view of Fondurulia disclose the apparatus according to claim 2. Furthermore, Carpenter discloses the insulator (insulation-213) surrounds the portion of the heater rod (heating device-238) that extends outside the metal body (portion-258). Regarding claim 4, Carpenter in view of Fondurulia disclose the apparatus according to claim 1. Furthermore, Carpenter discloses the insulator (insulation-213) is separated from the metal body (portion-258) by an air gap. (Col 8 line 14-20) Regarding claim 5, Carpenter in view of Fondurulia disclose the apparatus according to claim 1. Furthermore, Carpenter discloses the gas line (vapor delivery path-207 formed in part by bore-252) extends through the insulator (insulation-213). Regarding claim 6, Carpenter discloses the apparatus according to claim 1. However, Carpenter fails to disclose the metal body is formed from stainless steel. Fondurulia discloses the metal body (base-402) is formed from stainless steel. (Col 11 line 6-26) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to include the design of Fondurulia into Carpenter for the purpose of creating a more efficient device. The modification would allow for increased conductive heating transfer. Regarding claim 7, Carpenter discloses the apparatus according to claim 1. However, Carpenter fails to disclose the metal body further comprises a second thermocouple. Fondurulia discloses the metal body (base-402) further comprises a second thermocouple.(Col 22 line 49-Col 23 line 7) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to include the design of Fondurulia into Carpenter for the purpose of creating a more efficient device. The modification would allow for increased conductive heating transfer. Regarding claim 8, Carpenter discloses the apparatus according to claim 1. However, Carpenter fails to disclose the metal body further comprises a second thermocouple and wherein the first thermocouple is arranged at a first side of the metal body and the second thermocouple is arranged at a second side of the metal body, opposite the first side. Fondurulia discloses the metal body further comprises a second thermocouple and wherein the first thermocouple is arranged at a first side of the metal body and the second thermocouple is arranged at a second side of the metal body, opposite the first side. (Col 22 line 49-Col 23 line 7) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to include the design of Fondurulia into Carpenter for the purpose of creating a more efficient device. The modification would allow for increased conductive heating transfer. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 9-20 are indicated as having allowable subject matter. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Independent claim 9 is allowable as prior arts made available do not teach, or fairly suggest, a second cabinet disposed within the first cabinet and comprising a second wall in parallel with the first wall, wherein the second wall comprises a second through-hole aligned with the first through-hole. Independent claim 15 is allowable as prior arts made available do not teach, or fairly suggest, a second cabinet disposed within the first cabinet and comprising a second wall in parallel with the first wall, wherein the second wall comprises a second through-hole aligned with the first through-hole, wherein the second cabinet is separated from the first cabinet by an air gap; a vessel disposed within the second cabinet; a second section connected to an exhaust port; and a third section connected to a pressure sensor, wherein the third section extends through the first and second enclosures, and the pressure sensor is disposed outside of the second enclosure. Conclusion The prior art as cited on the PTO-892 is made of record and not relied upon but considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NIGEL H PLUMB whose telephone number is (571)272-8886. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John Breene can be reached at 571-272-4107. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (USA or CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NIGEL H PLUMB/Examiner, Art Unit 2855 /Eric S. McCall/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 17, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680886
Remote Fluid Properties Detection and Reporting
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680940
Modular Flowcell Unit and Flowcell Assembly
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674902
OPTICAL COMMUNICATION UNDERGROUND EQUIPMENT LOCATION MAPPING SYSTEM, OPTICAL COMMUNICATION UNDERGROUND EQUIPMENT LOCATION MAPPING METHOD, AND OPTICAL COMMUNICATION UNDERGROUND EQUIPMENT LOCATION MAPPING DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669390
SEMICONDUCTOR CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD FOR A SEMICONDUCTOR CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENT
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12669426
FLEXIBLE WALL DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MEASURING GAS PERMEABILITY COEFFICIENT AND GAS DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT OF SOIL
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+1.2%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 684 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month