Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/744,887

CRITICAL PATH SENSITIZATION IN ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 17, 2024
Examiner
KERVEROS, DEMETRIOS C
Art Unit
2111
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Nxp B V
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
933 granted / 1069 resolved
+32.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1099
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
§103
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
§102
50.1%
+10.1% vs TC avg
§112
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1069 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This is a NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION in response to the Amendment/ Remarks filed 02/17/2026. Claims 1-20 are pending in the Application, of which Claims 1 and 19 are independent. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 02/17/2026 has been entered. Continuity/ Priority Information The present Application 18744887 filed 06/17/2024 claims foreign priority to INDIA, Application 202441033760, filed 04/29/2024. Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments, see Amendment/ Remarks filed 02/17/2026 with respect to the rejection of Claims 1-20 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by ABSHISHEK et al. (Pub. No. US 20160169966), have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Shah et al. (Pub. No. US 20190011500) Pub. Date: 2019-01-10, as set forth in the present office action. Applicant argues that ABSHISHEK fails to disclose “configuration dataset comprising a respective scan chain identifier and a respective test pattern”, and to “identify a respective scan chain, and load the respective test pattern in the identified respective scan chain. In response to Applicant arguments, under a new ground(s) of rejection, Shah et al. discloses the above feature as follows: [0014] FIG. 1 The testing system 106 includes memory 108 for storing one or more test scan patterns 114. During a test sequence referred to herein as “scan chain testing,” the test controller 112 selects test scan patterns 114 and transmits control signals to the user function block 104 for selectively programming (loading) individual elements of the scan chain 110 with values of each selected test scan pattern, as described below. [0027] In FIG. 3, multiplexors (e.g., 330, 332, 334) are present to facilitate selection of a scan chain (e.g., 304, 306, 308, 310) for loading either serial or parallel fashion with one another. Clearly, the Claimed limitation as recited in Claim 1, is functionally equivalent to the “scan chain testing” disclosed by Shah. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shah et al. (Pub. No. US 20190011500) Pub. Date: 2019-01-10. Regarding independent Claims 1 and 19, Shah discloses programmable scan shift testing for a scan chain, comprising: a critical logic circuit comprising a critical path; and a plurality of scan chains coupled to the critical logic circuit and associated with activation of the critical path; [0013] FIG. 1. The semiconductor chip 102 includes one or more function blocks 104 “critical logic circuit”, and each function block includes one or more scan chains110 for performing scan tests on the associated function block. [0015] An example portion 134 of the scan chain 110 includes a number of flip-flops (e.g., FF1, FF2, FF3) connected in series. Each of the flip-flops is provided with inputs through a corresponding multiplexor 118. [0016] When a clock pulse (CLK) is allowed to excite the scan-flops, a combinatorial logic block 126 “critical path” receives as inputs the outputs of each of the scan-flops as well as other system inputs. The combinatorial logic block 126 “critical path” then performs a combinatorial logic function on the inputs received from each one of the scan-flops to produce a logic function output. a control circuit coupled to the plurality of scan chains configured to receive a plurality of configuration datasets, wherein each configuration dataset comprises a respective scan chain identifier and a respective test pattern, [0014] The testing system 106 includes memory 108 for storing one or more test scan patterns 114. During a test sequence referred to herein as “scan chain testing,” the test controller 112 selects test scan patterns 114 and transmits control signals to the user function block 104 for selectively programming (loading) individual elements of the scan chain 110 with values of each selected test scan pattern, as described below. the control circuit is configured to identify a respective scan chain associated with the respective scan chain identifier, and load the respective test pattern in the identified respective scan chain. [0027] In FIG. 3, multiplexors (e.g., 330, 332, 334) are present to facilitate selection of a scan chain (e.g., 304, 306, 308, 310) i.e. corresponding to “identify a respective scan chain”, for loading either serial or parallel fashion with one another. Gates 318, 320, 322 and 324 can either mask the respective chain or permit loading of the chain from a SCAN_IN port based on input from PROG_SCAN_IN. Block 314 is responsible for the compression of the test data output when scan chains are operated in parallel mode. Regarding Claims 2-4, 7-9, 13-16, 20, Shah discloses the scan chains are sequentially loaded with test patterns. [0015] FIG. 1. During a test mode of operation, each of the flip-flops receives data from the SI input. Each flip-flop and its corresponding multiplexor are together herein referred to as a “scan-flop” (e.g., scan-flops 128, 130, and 132). The different scan-flops 128, 130, and 132 are connected in a serial shift register fashion during a test mode such that the output of each scan-flop becomes an input to the next scan-flop when the SI input is selected. [0016] In one implementation, a scan chain test sequence includes three phases: loading or “shift-in”, capture, and un-loading or “shift-out.” An initial loading phase is initiated by configuring the scan-flops for the test mode by asserting ‘1’ values along selection lines (SE) to selecting the SI inputs and loading one of the test scan patterns 114 (e.g., a sequence of 1's and 0's) into the scan-flops in the chain 110. Regarding Claims 5, 6, Shah discloses wherein the activation of the critical path is enabled based on an asserted state of the mode signal. [0016] In one implementation, a scan chain test sequence includes three phases: loading or “shift-in”, capture, and un-loading or “shift-out.” An initial loading phase is initiated by configuring the scan-flops for the test mode by asserting ‘1’ values along selection lines (SE) to selecting the SI inputs and loading one of the test scan patterns 114 (e.g., a sequence of 1's and 0's) into the scan-flops in the chain 110. Regarding Claims 10-12, Shah discloses plurality of pattern bits is loaded in the first scan chain based on an asserted state of the first select signal; [0014] Prior to loading, values of a selected test scan pattern are decompressed by de-compression logic 116 and provided to a scan-in port 122 of the scan chain 110. In a final stage of testing for each of the test scan patterns 114, values stored in the scan chain 110 are unloaded at a scan-out port 124, compressed by the compression sub-block 120, and transmitted back to the test controller 112 for processing. Regarding Claims 17, 18, Shah discloses logic elements that are activated based on activation bits, derived from the set of predetermined values, and wherein the plurality of critical paths are activated simultaneously. [0027] In FIG. 3, multiplexors (e.g., 330, 332, 334) are present to facilitate selection of a scan chain (e.g., 304, 306, 308, 310) for loading either serial or parallel fashion “activated simultaneously” with one another. Gates 318, 320, 322 and 324 can either mask the respective chain or permit loading of the chain from a SCAN_IN port based on input from PROG_SCAN_IN. Block 314 is responsible for the compression of the test data output when scan chains are operated in parallel mode. Prior Art References Cited The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See References Cited on PTO-892 form. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES C KERVEROS whose telephone number is (571)272-3824. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MARK FEATHERSTONE can be reached at (571) 270-3750. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES C KERVEROS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2111 Date: March 3, 2026 Non-Final Rejection 20260303 JAMES C. KERVEROS Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2111 James.Kerveros@USPTO.GOV
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 17, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Nov 17, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 12, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Feb 17, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601785
PROVIDING CONFIGURABLE SECURITY FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CIRCUITS OF A PROCESSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602167
DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12591492
DATA PROCESSING NETWORK FOR DATA PROCESSING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586655
MEMORY FAILURE ANALYSIS BASED ON BITLINE THRESHOLD VOLTAGE DISTRIBUTIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12566651
ERROR DETECTION FOR ENCRYPTION OR DECRYPTION KEYS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+2.6%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1069 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month