Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/745,037

ELECTRIC WORKING MACHINE WITH OPERATING ROD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 17, 2024
Examiner
CROSBY JR, RICHARD D
Art Unit
3724
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Yamabiko Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 12m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
322 granted / 471 resolved
-1.6% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
520
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
43.9%
+3.9% vs TC avg
§102
23.0%
-17.0% vs TC avg
§112
31.4%
-8.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 471 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 06/17/2024 and 01/15/2025 have been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ota (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2017/0273239) in view of Regarding claim 1, Ota teaches an electric working machine (Figures 2A-2B) with an operating rod (2) comprising: an electric motor (40) provided on the base end (3) of the operating rod (Figure 2A and Paragraph 0096); a working device (5) provided on the head end (4) of the operating rod (Figure 2A); and a power transmission shaft (28) passing through the inside of the operating rod and configured to transmit power from the electric motor to the working device, wherein: a lead wire is laid in the operating rod along a longitudinal direction of the power transmission shaft (Paragraph 0113); the operating rod includes a wiring space around the power transmission shaft to lay the lead wire (Figures 2A, 2B and 3A-3C; Paragraphs 0113-0119); and the operating rod includes a plurality of pull-out holes to pull connecting terminals of the lead wire out from itself (Figure 2B noting the pull out holes provided on each of the first and second pipes 14,15 respectively). Regarding claim 2, Ota teaches the electric working machine with an operating rod according to claim 1, wherein: the connecting terminal on one end of the lead wire is connected to a controller (60,67)(Paragraph 0191 noting motor controller 67 to be within the controller 80) provided on the base end of the operating rod (Paragraphs 0125-0132) and the connecting terminal on the other end of the lead wire is connected to a detection switch (36) attached to the head end of the operating rod to detect the posture of the working device (Paragraphs 0157-0162). Regarding claim 3, Ota teaches the electric working machine with an operating rod according to claim 2, wherein: the detection switch detects the storage posture of the working device; and the controller includes a processor (Paragraph 0137) configured to prevent the electric motor from being driven when the detection switch detects the storage posture of the working device (Paragraph 0162). Regarding claim 4, Ota teaches the electric working machine with an operating rod according to claim 1, wherein a connecting terminal of the lead wire is connected to 913416a detection switch (70) provided on a front handle (7) attached at the intermediate position of the operating rod (Figures 2A and 7; Paragraphs 0092-0093). Regarding claim 5, Ota teaches the electric working machine with an operating rod according to claim 1, wherein a connecting terminal of the connecting terminals of the lead wire are smaller than a pull-out hole of the pull-out holes so that the connecting terminal can go through the pull-out hole (Figure 2B noting the wiring hose to be smaller than the end of elements 14/16). Regarding claim 6, Ota teaches the electric working machine with an operating rod according to claim 1, wherein the lead wire pulled out from the pull-out holes is covered with a cover member (16)(Figures 3A-3C; Examiner notes the wires to be covered via a cover (16) when the device is extended as shown in Figure 3C). Regarding claim 7, Ota teaches the electric working machine according to claim 1, wherein the lead wire is pulled out from the pull-out holes and connected to a plurality of detection switches (Paragraph 0116 and 0175). Related Prior Art Below is an analysis of the relevance of references cited but not used - "892 cited references B-M on page 1 and A- F on Page 2 establish the state of the art with a variety of handheld cutting tools with different cutting elements/blades using a variety of electrical systems and sensors for the device. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RICHARD D CROSBY JR whose telephone number is (571)272-8034. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00-4:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Boyer Ashley can be reached at (571) 272-4502. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RICHARD D CROSBY JR/ 12/23/2025Examiner, Art Unit 3724
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 17, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600050
SHAVING APPARATUS HAVING A RAZOR HANDLE FOR DISPOSABLE RAZOR CARTRIDGES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600046
AUTO OPENING FOLDING KNIFE BLADE ENGAGEMENT LOCK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594613
CUTTING PLIER AND CUTTING PLIER HEAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594614
RIBBON SAW WITH DOUBLE SECURITY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12570015
PERSONAL CARE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+16.4%)
2y 12m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 471 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month