Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Yamabiko Corporation

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

13 pending office actions • 5 art units • 12 examiners • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 33 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Yamabiko Corporation currently manages 14 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed among 13 distinct examiners, which is a smaller number than the total 14 pending office actions. The portfolio involves 6 distinct art units, indicating that the company's filings are focused within a few technical groups. AYALA, FERNANDO A is the busiest examiner, currently handling 2 pending office actions.

The 13 distinct examiners involved suggest that most examiners are responsible for only one or two cases for the company. This distribution across 6 distinct art units requires the company to be prepared for various examination styles within Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. AYALA, FERNANDO A, with 2 pending office actions, represents a higher concentration of work than the other distinct examiners. Practitioners should note that the 14 pending office actions are subject to the discretion of these 13 distinct examiners.

The 6 distinct art units involved mean that the company must coordinate its prosecution strategy across a limited number of technical niches. With 14 pending office actions, the portfolio is relatively concentrated around the 13 distinct examiners. AYALA, FERNANDO A and their 2 pending office actions represent the highest point of examiner concentration for the company at this time.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (54%)
5
Medium (38%)
1
Easy (8%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only5 (38%)
§112 only1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)7 (54%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
11
Mechanical / Eng
85% of docket
2
Business / Other
15% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AYALA, FERNANDO A 2 53.6% +26.2%
PATEL, SHARDUL D 1 87.4% +12.3%
JARIWALA, CHIRAG 1 62.3% +27.3%
DONG, LIANG 1 53.2% +32.9%
MICHALSKI, SEAN M 1 53.1% +13.2%
FABIAN-KOVACS, ARPAD 1 84.9% +3.1%
WOOD, BLAKE ANDREW 1 71.3% +14.4%
RILEY, JONATHAN G 1 52.2% +30.3%
PRONE, JASON D 1 61.9% +25.3%
ALQADERI, NADA MAHYOOB 1 76.2% +32.1%

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19257187 Blower JARIWALA, CHIRAG 10d overdue
19332554 Working Machine PATEL, SHARDUL D —
19106788 GUIDE BAR AND CHAIN SAW MICHALSKI, SEAN M —
18897085 Function Adding Device And Work Machine FABIAN-KOVACS, ARPAD —
18785691 WORKING ROBOT SYSTEM WOOD, BLAKE ANDREW —
18605994 Hedge Trimmer AYALA, FERNANDO A —
18090616 Electric Working Machine MACFARLANE, EVAN H —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19257187 Blower JARIWALA, CHIRAG 10d overdue
18039861 MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR MOBILE OBJECT, PROGRAM, AND MANAGEMENT METHOD FOR MOBILE OBJECT ALQADERI, NADA MAHYOOB 28d
18585573 Electric Working Machine PRONE, JASON D 63d
19332554 Working Machine PATEL, SHARDUL D —
19063680 Chainsaw DONG, LIANG —
19106788 GUIDE BAR AND CHAIN SAW MICHALSKI, SEAN M —
18917440 HANDHELD WORKING MACHINE AYALA, FERNANDO A —
18785691 WORKING ROBOT SYSTEM WOOD, BLAKE ANDREW —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3724 6
3664 2
3746 1
3658 1
3668 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19332554 Working Machine PATEL, SHARDUL D 3664 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 18, 2025
19257187 Blower JARIWALA, CHIRAG 3746 §102§103 Final Rejection 10d overdue Pending Jul 01, 2025
19063680 Chainsaw DONG, LIANG 3724 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 26, 2025
19106788 GUIDE BAR AND CHAIN SAW MICHALSKI, SEAN M — §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 26, 2025
18917440 HANDHELD WORKING MACHINE AYALA, FERNANDO A 3724 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 16, 2024
18897085 Function Adding Device And Work Machine FABIAN-KOVACS, ARPAD — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 26, 2024
18785691 WORKING ROBOT SYSTEM WOOD, BLAKE ANDREW 3658 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 26, 2024
18655456 POWER CUTTING MACHINE RILEY, JONATHAN G 3724 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 06, 2024
18605994 Hedge Trimmer AYALA, FERNANDO A 3724 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 15, 2024
18585573 Electric Working Machine PRONE, JASON D 3724 §103 Non-Final OA 63d Pending Feb 23, 2024
18039861 MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR MOBILE OBJECT, PROGRAM, AND MANAGEMENT METHOD FOR MOBILE OBJECT ALQADERI, NADA MAHYOOB 3664 §103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Oct 25, 2023
18090616 Electric Working Machine MACFARLANE, EVAN H 3724 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 29, 2022
17881176 WORKING ROBOT SYSTEM ALGEHAIM, MOHAMED A 3668 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 04, 2022

Managing Yamabiko Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month