DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Response to Amendments
Entry of Amendments
Claim(s) 1, 9 and 17 have been amended.
Objections to the Claims
Amendments made to claim(s) 1, 9 and 17 have overcome the previous objections. Claim(s) 1, 9 and 17 are no longer objected.
Rejections under 35 USC 102 and 103
Applicant’s amendments filed 06/09/2026 with respect to Claim(s) 1-20 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive.
As to applicant(s) argument of [1] “While the cited portion of Winter may disclose coil configurations, it does not disclose "installing the second configuration into the metal detector by replacing the first configuration, wherein the installing of the second configuration reconfigures the metal detector to operate according to the second configuration without replacing the hardware components of the metal detector," as recited in Claim 1”, the Examiner respectfully disagrees. Winter teaches in figure(s) 1-2 predefined classification K1 having parameters (P1, S1, W1) are selected by control unit 170 for first detection configuration 850.1 for coils and predefined classification K2 having parameters (P2, S2, W2) are selected by control unit 170 for second detection configuration 850.2 for coils. This selection between coil configuration class parameters is set by SVM logic unit 181. This is performed in logical domain with same hardware components of 100, no hardware components need to be replaced. It is considered equivalent to installing one configuration by replacing another configuration, but not replacing hardware. (see para. 40 - a particularly suitable coil configuration, may be selected, i.e., preferably the one which is assigned to the classified class; para. 46 - An evaluation unit may particularly preferably be designed to determine, i.e., to select a coil configuration as a function of the pre-response signal, to which at least one transmitting coil of the number of transmitting coils a current is applied to emit a further transmitting signal … A transmitting coil and a receiving coil may preferably be integrated into a coil configuration or--alternatively or additionally--may be formed with the aid of the same coil, which is switched once in transmitting operation and once in receiving operation; para. 126 - With the aid of control unit 170, parameters P1 . . . Pn, Si ... Sn, W1 . . . Wn may additionally be changed for each i from 1 . . . n as the controlled variable, to optimize a response signal 131 as the controlled variable; abs. - predefining detection characteristics which are preset in the classified class). Therefore, Examiner believes Winter teaches the above feature of claims 1 and 9.
As to applicant(s) argument of [2] “While the cited portion of Nelson may disclose a switch for controlling the configuration of a coil, it does not disclose "installing the second configuration into the metal detector by replacing the first configuration, wherein the installing of the second configuration reconfigures the metal detector to operate according to the second configuration without replacing the hardware components of the metal detector," as recited in Claim 17”, the Examiner respectfully disagrees. Nelson teaches in figure 6 computer 62 selects coil switching setting to (a) or (b) which is equivalent to installing second configuration by replacing first configuration and this control operation does not require replacement of hardware components of metal detector of fig. 6. Therefore, Examiner believes Nelson teaches the above feature of claim 17.
Based on the arguments presented above, the Examiner strongly believes Winter or Nelson alone or in combination with others meets the current limitations for Claim(s) 1-20.
For further details see the rejections/objections for Claim(s) 1-20 herein.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
(a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claim(s) 1-5, 7-13 and 15-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Winter et al. (US 20130057249; hereinafter Winter).
Regarding claim 1, Winter discloses in figure(s) 1-8 a method of customizing and installing a configuration for a metal detector, comprising:
customizing a first configuration (configuration 850.1; figs. 2,7) for a metal detector (metal detector 100; fig. 1) to include a first set of features (parameters P1,S1,W1) selected from a set of available features associated with the metal detector, the set of available features constructed from a set of capabilities associated with hardware components (para. 126 - P1 . . . Pn for transmitter unit 110 and/or receiver unit 130, such as advantageously, e.g., pulse repetition frequency, energizing period, maximum current amplitude, sampling rate, amplification, or measuring time … a sequence and/or configuration of coils S1 . . . Sn… parameters W1 . . . Wn for analysis characteristics for control and evaluation unit 160; fig. 4A) of the metal detector, wherein the first configuration is configured to support a first classification (class K1 by Classification unit 180) of metal detecting operations of the metal detector;
installing the first configuration into the metal detector, wherein the installing enables the metal detector to operate according to the first configuration (para. 40 - a particularly suitable coil configuration, may be selected, i.e., preferably the one which is assigned to the classified class; para. 46 - An evaluation unit may particularly preferably be designed to determine, i.e., to select a coil configuration as a function of the pre-response signal, to which at least one transmitting coil of the number of transmitting coils a current is applied to emit a further transmitting signal);
customizing a second configuration (configuration 850.2; figs. 2,8) for the metal detector (100) to include a second set of features (parameters P2,S2,W2) selected from the set of available features different from the first set of features (parameters P1,S1,W1) of the first configuration, wherein the second configuration is configured to support a second classification (class K2) of metal detecting operations of the metal detector different from the first classification (K1) of metal detecting operations; and
installing the second configuration into the metal detector by replacing the first configuration (para. 49 - A first exciter signal form may be achieved, for example, using a first certain coil configuration and a different second exciter signal form may be achieved using a second certain coil configuration), wherein the installing of the second configuration reconfigures the metal detector to operate according to the second configuration without replacing hardware components (para. 159; figs. 4A.4B; clm. 19 - a control unit is designed for the automatic control of at least the response signal as the controlled variable and is connected for control to the classification unit and the control and evaluation unit to form a control loop - predefined classification K1 having parameters (P1, S1, W1) are selected by control unit 170 for first detection configuration 850.1 for coils and predefined classification K2 having parameters (P2, S2, W2) are selected by control unit 170 for second detection configuration 850.2 for coils alternatively by SVM 181 of device 100 is considered installing one or other configuration without requiring any hardware replacement) of the metal detector (para. 125 - a coil configuration is assigned to second class K2, which is particularly well suited for the detection of objects and/or surroundings characteristics according to key A.sub.1B.sub.1C.sub.1D.sub.xE.sub.x.).
Regarding claim 2, Winter discloses in figure(s) 1-8 the method of claim 1, wherein customizing the first configuration for the metal detector includes one or more of:
selecting features from the set of available features to include in the first set of features (para. 40 - a particularly suitable coil configuration, may be selected, i.e., preferably the one which is assigned to the classified class);
selecting a configuration for features selected for inclusion in the first set of features that are that are configurable to different performance levels (para. 18 - a detection device are then adapted in a particularly preferred way to the object and/or surroundings characteristics, which improves the detection overall), the configuration defining a selected performance level;
selecting features from the set of available features to exclude from the first set of features; and
selecting features from the first set of features to enable or to disable.
Regarding claim 3, Winter discloses in figure(s) 1-8 the method of claim 1, wherein customizing the first configuration for the metal detector includes selecting a product profile (product features as in table 1 in para. 112) that includes the first set of features, wherein the product profile is configured to support the first classification of metal detecting operations of the metal detector.
Regarding claim 4, Winter discloses in figure(s) 1-8 the method of claim 1, wherein customizing the second configuration for the metal detector further includes selecting a product profile that includes the second set of features, wherein the product profile is configured to support the second classification of metal detecting operations of the metal detector (para. 69 - for detecting a comparatively large object, the classification unit selects a transmitting coil which has a comparatively large diameter, and for detecting a comparatively small object, it selects a transmitting coil having a comparatively small diameter).
Regarding claim 5, Winter discloses in figure(s) 1-8 the method of claim 1, wherein the second configuration includes upgraded versions of one or more features from the first set of features of the first configuration, wherein the upgraded versions provide enhanced performance levels compared to those in the first configuration (para. 80 - a controller of the detection device is designed to determine an SNR value of the pre-response signal and to perform the selection of the at least one transmitting coil and/or the determination of the measuring method and/or the establishment of the sampling rate, the amplification, the energizing period, the measuring time, and/or the maximum current in such a way that the SNR value of the main response signal is greater than the SNR value of the pre-response signal. The measuring environment of the detection device is thus adapted in an improved way to the instantaneous object and/or environmental characteristic).
Regarding claim 7, Winter discloses in figure(s) 1-8 the method of claim 1, wherein the first classification of metal detecting operations is based on a performance level of the metal detector, and wherein the second classification of metal detecting operations represents a different performance level achieved by the second configuration for the metal detector, the different performance level providing one of higher detection capabilities (para. 80 - a controller of the detection device is designed to determine an SNR value of the pre-response signal and to perform the selection of the at least one transmitting coil and/or the determination of the measuring method and/or the establishment of the sampling rate, the amplification, the energizing period, the measuring time, and/or the maximum current in such a way that the SNR value of the main response signal is greater than the SNR value of the pre-response signal. The measuring environment of the detection device is thus adapted in an improved way to the instantaneous object and/or environmental characteristic) or lower detection capabilities compared to the first classification.
Regarding claim 8, Winter discloses in figure(s) 1-8 the method of claim 1, wherein the first classification of metal detecting operations is configured to enable a first metal detecting application, and wherein the second classification of metal detecting operations is configured to enable a second metal detecting application different from the first metal detecting application, the second metal detecting application requiring a distinct set of features for optimization (para. 119 - Control unit 170 is thus designed, e.g., with operation of optimum sequence and/or configuration S of coils, to cause emission of further transmitting signal 120, which is adapted with the aid of selected configuration S; fig. 2).
Regarding claim 9, Winter discloses in figure(s) 1-8 a system configured for customizing and installing a configuration for a metal detector, comprising:
at least one processor (para. 135 - Control unit 170 preferably has digital processing means; para. 120 - control and evaluation unit 160); and
a memory operably coupled to the at least one processor and storing processor-readable code that, when executed by the at least one processor (para. 120 - receives the instructions via control signal 140 – implies storage for instructions), is configured to perform operations including:
customizing a first configuration (configuration 850.1; figs. 2,7) for a metal detector (metal detector 100; fig. 1) to include a first set of features (parameters P1,S1,W1) selected from a set of available features associated with the metal detector, the set of available features constructed from a set of capabilities associated with hardware components (para. 126 - P1 . . . Pn for transmitter unit 110 and/or receiver unit 130, such as advantageously, e.g., pulse repetition frequency, energizing period, maximum current amplitude, sampling rate, amplification, or measuring time … a sequence and/or configuration of coils S1 . . . Sn… parameters W1 . . . Wn for analysis characteristics for control and evaluation unit 160; fig. 4A) of the metal detector, wherein the first configuration is configured to support a first classification (class K1 by Classification unit 180) of metal detecting operations of the metal detector;
installing the first configuration into the metal detector, wherein the installing enables the metal detector to operate according to the first configuration (para. 40 - a particularly suitable coil configuration, may be selected, i.e., preferably the one which is assigned to the classified class; para. 46 - An evaluation unit may particularly preferably be designed to determine, i.e., to select a coil configuration as a function of the pre-response signal, to which at least one transmitting coil of the number of transmitting coils a current is applied to emit a further transmitting signal);
customizing a second configuration (configuration 850.2; figs. 2,8) for the metal detector (100) to include a second set of features (parameters P2,S2,W2) selected from the set of available features different from the first set of features (parameters P1,S1,W1) of the first configuration, wherein the second configuration is configured to support a second classification (class K2) of metal detecting operations of the metal detector different from the first classification (K1) of metal detecting operations; and
installing the second configuration into the metal detector by replacing the first configuration (para. 49 - A first exciter signal form may be achieved, for example, using a first certain coil configuration and a different second exciter signal form may be achieved using a second certain coil configuration), wherein the installing of the second configuration reconfigures the metal detector to operate according to the second configuration without replacing hardware components (para. 159; figs. 4A.4B; clm. 19 - a control unit is designed for the automatic control of at least the response signal as the controlled variable and is connected for control to the classification unit and the control and evaluation unit to form a control loop) of the metal detector (para. 125 - a coil configuration is assigned to second class K2, which is particularly well suited for the detection of objects and/or surroundings characteristics according to key A.sub.1B.sub.1C.sub.1D.sub.xE.sub.x.).
Regarding claim 10, Winter discloses in figure(s) 1-8 the system of claim 9, wherein customizing the first configuration for the metal detector includes one or more of: selecting features from the set of available features to include in the first set of features (para. 40 - a particularly suitable coil configuration, may be selected, i.e., preferably the one which is assigned to the classified class); selecting a configuration for features selected for inclusion in the first set of features that are that are configurable to different performance levels (para. 18 - a detection device are then adapted in a particularly preferred way to the object and/or surroundings characteristics, which improves the detection overall), the configuration defining a selected performance level; selecting features from the set of available features to exclude from the first set of features; and selecting features from the first set of features to enable or to disable.
Regarding claim 11, Winter discloses in figure(s) 1-8 the system of claim 9, wherein customizing the first configuration for the metal detector includes selecting a product profile (product features as in table 1 in para. 112) that includes the first set of features, wherein the product profile is configured to support the first classification of metal detecting operations of the metal detector.
Regarding claim 12, Winter discloses in figure(s) 1-8 the system of claim 9, wherein customizing the second configuration for the metal detector further includes selecting a product profile that includes the second set of features, wherein the product profile is configured to support the second classification of metal detecting operations of the metal detector (para. 69 - for detecting a comparatively large object, the classification unit selects a transmitting coil which has a comparatively large diameter, and for detecting a comparatively small object, it selects a transmitting coil having a comparatively small diameter).
Regarding claim 13, Winter discloses in figure(s) 1-8 the system of claim 9, wherein the second configuration includes upgraded versions of one or more features from the first set of features of the first configuration, wherein the upgraded versions provide enhanced performance levels compared to those in the first configuration (para. 80 - a controller of the detection device is designed to determine an SNR value of the pre-response signal and to perform the selection of the at least one transmitting coil and/or the determination of the measuring method and/or the establishment of the sampling rate, the amplification, the energizing period, the measuring time, and/or the maximum current in such a way that the SNR value of the main response signal is greater than the SNR value of the pre-response signal. The measuring environment of the detection device is thus adapted in an improved way to the instantaneous object and/or environmental characteristic).
Regarding claim 15, Winter discloses in figure(s) 1-8 the system of claim 9, wherein the first classification of metal detecting operations is based on a performance level of the metal detector, and wherein the second classification of metal detecting operations represents a different performance level achieved by the second configuration for the metal detector, the different performance level providing one of higher detection capabilities (para. 80 - a controller of the detection device is designed to determine an SNR value of the pre-response signal and to perform the selection of the at least one transmitting coil and/or the determination of the measuring method and/or the establishment of the sampling rate, the amplification, the energizing period, the measuring time, and/or the maximum current in such a way that the SNR value of the main response signal is greater than the SNR value of the pre-response signal. The measuring environment of the detection device is thus adapted in an improved way to the instantaneous object and/or environmental characteristic) or lower detection capabilities compared to the first classification.
Regarding claim 16, Winter discloses in figure(s) 1-8 the system of claim 9, wherein the first classification of metal detecting operations is configured to enable a first metal detecting application, and wherein the second classification of metal detecting operations is configured to enable a second metal detecting application different from the first metal detecting application, the second metal detecting application requiring a distinct set of features for optimization (para. 119 - Control unit 170 is thus designed, e.g., with operation of optimum sequence and/or configuration S of coils, to cause emission of further transmitting signal 120, which is adapted with the aid of selected configuration S; fig. 2).
Claim(s) 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Nelson et al. (US 7157913; hereinafter Nelson).
Regarding claim 17, Nelson discloses in figure(s) 1-6 a computer-based tool for customizing and installing a configuration for a metal detector, the computer-based tool including non-transitory computer readable media having stored thereon computer code which, when executed by a processor, causes a computing device (computer 62; fig. 6) to perform operations comprising:
customizing (by switch 60 in fig 6; col. 5 line 8-15 :- switch 60 connected between windings 32a, 32b for selectively configuring coil 50 between differential configuration 31 and summing configuration 36) a first configuration (differential receiver coil configuration 31; figs. 3, 5a,6) for a metal detector (abs. – inductive metal detector) to include a first set of features (differential/balanced coil) selected from a set of available features (differential/balanced or summing/single) associated with the metal detector, the set of available features constructed from a set of capabilities associated with hardware components (switched receiver coil 50, transmitter 30, amplifier 34; figs. 3-4) of the metal detector, wherein the first configuration is configured to support a first classification (classify small metal target) of metal detecting operations of the metal detector (col. 5 lines. 49-51 – operator/computer can toggle between small and large metal target modes using the same metal detector by simply altering the configuration of the receiver coil);
installing the first configuration into the metal detector (col. 5 lines 10-15 :- responsive to a control signal 61 operator can control positions depicted at (a) and (b) in FIG. 6 of switch 60), wherein the installing enables the metal detector to operate according to the first configuration (differential configuration);
customizing a second configuration (summing receiver coil configuration 36; figs. 4, 5b,6) for the metal detector to include a second set of features (summing) selected from a set of available features (differential/balanced or summing/single) different from the first set of features of the first configuration, wherein the second configuration is configured to support a second classification (classify large metal target) of metal detecting operations of the metal detector different from the first classification of metal detecting operations; and
installing the second configuration (col. 5 lines 10-15 :- responsive to a control signal 61 operator can control positions depicted at (a) and (b) in FIG. 6 of switch 60) into the metal detector by replacing the first configuration (by switching position of 60 from (a) to (b)), wherein the installing of the second configuration reconfigures the metal detector to operate according to the second configuration (summing configuration) without replacing hardware components (50,30,34 hardware intact) of the metal detector.
Regarding claim 18, Nelson discloses in figure(s) 1-6 the computer-based tool of claim 17, wherein customizing the first configuration for the metal detector includes selecting a product profile (windings 32a and 32b are connected together such that they are wound in opposite directions targeting small target detection) that includes the first set of features, wherein the product profile is configured to support the first classification of metal detecting operations of the metal detector, and wherein customizing the second configuration for the metal detector further includes selecting a product profile that includes the second set of features, wherein the product profile is configured to support the second classification of metal detecting operations of the metal detector (windings 32a and 32b are connected together such that they are wound in same directions targeting large target detection).
Regarding claim 19, Nelson discloses in figure(s) 1-6 the computer-based tool of claim 17, wherein the first classification of metal detecting operations is based on a performance level of the metal detector, and wherein the second classification of metal detecting operations represents a different performance level achieved by the second configuration for the metal detector, the different performance level providing one of higher detection capabilities (col. 5 lines 35-45 :- If the receiver coils were connected in a differential configuration (position (a) in FIG. 6), the signal from a large object beneath the coils would be close to zero after performing the differential algorithm unless the metal object was off to one side of the sensor head (transmitter/receiver coil). Either way, classifying such a relatively large object would be much more difficult in a differential receiver coil configuration) or lower detection capabilities compared to the first classification.
Regarding claim 20, Nelson discloses in figure(s) 1-6 the computer-based tool of claim 17, wherein the first classification of metal detecting operations is configured to enable a first metal detecting application, and wherein the second classification of metal detecting operations is configured to enable a second metal detecting application different from the first metal detecting application, the second metal detecting application requiring a distinct set of features for optimization (col. 3 lines 5-25 :- metal detection sensitivity and detection depth are functions of the transmitter and receiver coil size … differential receiver coil allows for a faster responding metal detection signal high bandwidth; col. 3 lines 35-45 :- a pulse inductive metal detector that can selectively change the receiver coil configuration from a differential configuration good for detecting and classifying smaller metal objects to a summing configuration good for detecting and classifying larger metal objects).
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claim(s) 6 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Winter in view of Nelson et al. (US 20050253711; hereinafter Nelson2).
Regarding claim(s) 6 and 14, Winter teaches in figure(s) 1-16 the method of claim 1 and the system of claim 9, respectively.
Winter does not teach explicitly wherein the second configuration includes downgraded versions of one or more features from the first set of features of the first configuration, wherein the downgraded versions provide lower performance levels compared to those in the first configuration.
However, Nelson2 teaches in figure(s) 1-16 wherein the second configuration includes downgraded versions (high bandwidth, low sensitivity snr TD mode versus low bandwidth, high sensitivity snr FD mode tradeoff of metal detector in paras. 8-9 tables 1, 2) of one or more features from the first set of features of the first configuration, wherein the downgraded versions provide lower performance (lower bandwidth) levels compared to those in the first configuration.
It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Winter by having wherein the second configuration includes downgraded versions of one or more features from the first set of features of the first configuration, wherein the downgraded versions provide lower performance levels compared to those in the first configuration as taught by Nelson2 in order to provide use of known technique to improve similar devices (methods, or products) in the same way as evidenced by "variable inductor transmitter and receiver coil realized via switches connecting coils in series or parallel combinations to achieve high and low bandwidth operation" (para. 48).
Prior Art
The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure.
King et al. (US 20210072145) discloses “System And Method For Sensing Corrosion In An Enclosure Of An Information Handling System”.
Ganick et al. (US 20250341485) discloses “Systems and methods for monitoring conductivity of a fluid”.
Conclusion
THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AKM ZAKARIA whose telephone number is (571)270-0664. The examiner can normally be reached on 8-5 PM (PST).
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Judy Nguyen can be reached on (571) 272-2258. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/AKM ZAKARIA/
Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Prosecution Insights