Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/746,426

MAINTENANCE METHOD AND IMAGE RECORDING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 18, 2024
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Art Unit
1714
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
44%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
59%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 44% of resolved cases
44%
Career Allow Rate
286 granted / 649 resolved
-20.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
683
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
56.1%
+16.1% vs TC avg
§102
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
§112
28.1%
-11.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 649 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group I, Species A2 and Species B1 in the reply filed on January 16, 2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that there is no serious undue burden. This is found persuasive. Therefore, the Restriction requirement dated November 19, 2025 is withdrawn. Claims 1-14 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 3 recites “the liquid contains the defoaming agent of glycol ethers in a ratio of 20% or more.” A ratio is a quantitative relation between two amounts, and it is unclear what the amount of glycol ether is being compared with to achieve a ratio of 20% or more. Is it the overall amount of liquid, the amount of cleaning liquid, the amount of surfactant, or something else? Appropriate correction is required. Claim 4 recites “the liquid contains the defoaming agent of glycol ethers in a ratio of 30% or more.” A ratio is a quantitative relation between two amounts, and it is unclear what the amount of glycol ether is being compared with to achieve a ratio of 30% or more. Is it the overall amount of liquid, the amount of cleaning liquid, the amount of surfactant, or something else? Appropriate correction is required. Claim 5 recites “the liquid contains the defoaming agent of polyhydric alcohols in a ratio of 6% or more.” A ratio is a quantitative relation between two amounts, and it is unclear what the amount of polyhydric alcohols is being compared with to achieve a ratio of 6% or more. Is it the overall amount of liquid, the amount of cleaning liquid, the amount of surfactant, or something else? Appropriate correction is required. Claim 6 recites “the liquid contains the defoaming agent of polyhydric alcohols in a ratio of 10% or more.” A ratio is a quantitative relation between two amounts, and it is unclear what the amount of polyhydric alcohols is being compared with to achieve a ratio of 10% or more. Is it the overall amount of liquid, the amount of cleaning liquid, the amount of surfactant, or something else? Appropriate correction is required. Claims 7 and 8 are rejected for depending on rejected claims 4 or 6. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 2 and 9-14 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The closest prior art is U.S. Patent App. Pub. No. 2013/0257975 to Aoyama et al. Aoyama discloses a maintenance method and an image recording device (see Aoyama Abstract) wherein a cleaning liquid containing a surfactant is supplied to a predetermined portion of an inkjet printer (see Aoyama paragraphs [0059]-[0068] disclosing a first cleaning liquid A with a surfactant) and a second liquid containing a defoaming agent is supplied to the predetermined portion to which the cleaning liquid is supplied (see Aoyama paragraphs [0075]-[0081] disclosing a second liquid B containing a defoaming agent). No prior art was located disclosing that the second liquid has a ratio of a defoaming distance to a foaming distance of 4.41% or more, the foaming distance is a first height of bubbles generated when the cleaning liquid is stirred by a stirrer for 1 minute, the cleaning liquid being put into a bottle having an inner diameter of 38 mm and a capacity of 50 ml so as to have a height of 20 mm, and the defoaming distance is a value obtained by subtracting, from the first height of the bubbles, a second height of bubbles after 1 ml of the liquid is dropped into the bottle after the bubbles are generated. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DOUGLAS LEE whose telephone number is (571)270-3296. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kaj Olsen can be reached at 571-272-1344. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DOUGLAS LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1714
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 18, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599941
CLEAN HEAD, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR USE IN CLEANING A FLUID CONDUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603263
APPARATUSES AND TECHNIQUES FOR CLEANING A MULTI-STATION SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESSING CHAMBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12569109
DISHWASHER FOR TREATING WASHWARE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565004
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12557578
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD AND SUBLIMATION DRYING PROCESSING AGENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
44%
Grant Probability
59%
With Interview (+14.8%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 649 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month