Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/748,997

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING DATA STREAMS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 20, 2024
Priority
Jun 21, 2023 — provisional 63/509,405
Examiner
YU, JAE UN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
MongoDB Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
668 granted / 744 resolved
+29.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
763
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
§103
51.0%
+11.0% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 744 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 1. Claims 1, 7, 8, 16, 17, and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bose et al. (US 2023/0195673), “Bose”. 2. As per claim 1, Bose discloses a management interface configured to: receive information from a user relating to a stream instance, the information including data associated with one or more data sources and/or one or more data sinks [a configuration file specifying user-defined data sources and user-defined data sinks relating to shareable data between multiprocessing workers, abstract]; enable the user to manage the stream instance [enabling data share between multiprocessing workers, abstract]; generate one or more connect strings for creating a stream processor associated with the stream instance [generating event gates for sharing data between multiprocessing workers, figure 3] [Such data share process corresponds to the claimed “stream processor”]; cause the system to create the stream processor associated with the created stream instance based on the one or more connect strings [sharing data between multiprocessing workers based on the event gates, figure 3]; and enable the user to manage the created stream processor based on one or more control inputs received from the user [starting data share between multiprocessing workers based on identified event consumers, figure 3]. 3. As per claim 7, Bose discloses wherein creating the stream processor comprises establishing a connection between a first data source of the one or more data sources and a first data sink of the one or more data sinks [a configuration file specifying user-defined data sources and user-defined data sinks relating to shareable data between multiprocessing workers, abstract]. 4. As per claim 8, Bose discloses wherein managing the created stream processor comprises starting, stopping, and/or deleting the created stream processor [starting data share between multiprocessing workers based on identified event consumers, figure 3]. 5. As per claim 16, Bose discloses wherein the management interface comprises an application programming interface configured to receive information from one or more data stream platforms [application programming interface, paragraph 33]. 6. As per claims 17 and 21, the examiner directs the applicant’s attention to claim rejection above. Conclusion A. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-6, 9-15, 18-20, 22, and 23 are objected to. The closest prior art of record “Bose” discloses data sharing in multiprocessing environment in the abstract. The primary reasons for allowance of claims 2 and 18 in the instant application is the combination with the inclusion in these claims that “wherein enabling the user to manage the stream instance comprises enabling the user to: create the stream instance based on the received information from the user; drop the stream instance based on the received information from the user; and store the one or more connect strings for creating the stream instance and connection data associated with the one or more data sources and/or one or more data sinks in a connection registry”. The prior art of record neither anticipates nor renders obvious the above recited combination. The primary reasons for allowance of claims 9 and 22 in the instant application is the combination with the inclusion in these claims that “wherein managing the created stream processor comprises defining one or more operations for the created stream processor to perform on event data received from the first data source prior to landing the event data in the first data sink”. The prior art of record neither anticipates nor renders obvious the above recited combination. The primary reasons for allowance of claim 13 in the instant application is the combination with the inclusion in these claims that “wherein the management interface comprises: a stream instance component configured to: receive the information from the user; enable the user to manage the stream instance; and generate the one or more connection strings for creating the stream processor associated with the stream instance based on the information received from the user; and a stream processor component configured to: receive the one or more connection strings generated by the stream instance component based on input from the user; cause the system to create the stream processor associated with the created stream instance based on the received one or more connection strings; and enable the user to manage the created stream processor based on one or more control inputs received from the user”. The prior art of record neither anticipates nor renders obvious the above recited combination. As allowable subject matter has been indicated, applicant's response must either comply with all formal requirements or specifically traverse each requirement not complied with. See 37 C.F.R. § 1.111(b) and § 707.07(a) of the MPEP. B. Claims Rejected Claims 1, 7, 8, 16, 17, and 21 are rejected. C. Direction for Future Remarks Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAE UN YU whose telephone number is (571)272-1133. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tim Vo can be reached on (571)272-3642. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAE U YU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2138
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 20, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12705182
PROCESSING CACHE EVICTIONS IN A DIRECTORY SNOOP FILTER WITH ECAM
1y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699654
PACKET PROCESSING DEVICE TO DETERMINE MEMORY TO STORE DATA IN A SERVER ARCHITECTURE AND COMPUTING SYSTEM INCLUDING SAME
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12656962
AUTHENTICATION SERVER, AUTHENTICATION SYSTEM, AND AUTHENTICATION METHOD
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12639223
EMBEDDED CONFIGURABLE ENGINE
2y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640209
MODULATION OF SOURCE VOLTAGE IN NAND-FLASH ARRAY READ
1y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+9.8%)
2y 6m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 744 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month