Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Mongodb Inc.

11 pending office actions • 7 art units • 10 examiners • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 14 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 11 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
5
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 11 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 30 days (5)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
10
Medium (91%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (9%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only10 (91%)
No statute on record1 (9%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
11
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HARMON, COURTNEY N 2 62.2% +10.2%
TRAN, LOC 1 83.6% +23.8%
PHAN, TUANKHANH D 1 78.8% +13.0%
MOSER, BRUCE M 1 84.3% +20.1%
FILIPCZYK, MARCIN R 1 64.6% +37.2%
RICHARDSON, JAMES E 1 81.1% +31.5%
MOBIN, HASANUL 1 75.1% +39.1%
JAMI, HARES 1 73.1% +29.8%
HOANG, KEN 1 72.3% +31.6%
GHAFFARI, ABU Z 1 79.0% +46.9%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18748846 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING SHARDED DATA MOSER, BRUCE M 12d
18749115 DECOUPLED DATABASE SEARCH SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE RICHARDSON, JAMES E 22d

Interview Candidates (11)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19075500 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SYNCHRONIZING BETWEEN A SOURCE DATABASE CLUSTER AND A DESTINATION DATABASE CLUSTER TRAN, LOC 52d overdue
18328953 DATABASE SYSTEMS AND METHODS WITH ASYMMETRIC NODES GHAFFARI, ABU Z 44d overdue
18749515 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TIERED SYNCHRONIZATION FILIPCZYK, MARCIN R 32d overdue
18749035 DECOUPLED DATABASE SEARCH SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE MOBIN, HASANUL 31d overdue
19194833 TECHNIQUES FOR DYNAMICALLY SCALING HARDWARE CAPACITY USED TO HOST DATA PARTITIONS OF A DATABASE HARMON, COURTNEY N 12d
18748846 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING SHARDED DATA MOSER, BRUCE M 12d
18328853 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING QUERIES IN A DATA LAKE HOANG, KEN 14d
18749115 DECOUPLED DATABASE SEARCH SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE RICHARDSON, JAMES E 22d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2159 2
2164 2
2154 2
2168 2
2153 1
2169 1
2195 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19194833 TECHNIQUES FOR DYNAMICALLY SCALING HARDWARE CAPACITY USED TO HOST DATA PARTITIONS OF A DATABASE HARMON, COURTNEY N 2159 §103 Non-Final OA 12d Pending Apr 30, 2025
19075500 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SYNCHRONIZING BETWEEN A SOURCE DATABASE CLUSTER AND A DESTINATION DATABASE CLUSTER TRAN, LOC 2164 Other Non-Final OA 52d overdue Pending Mar 10, 2025
18948240 SYSTEMS AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING TIMESERIES DATA PHAN, TUANKHANH D 2154 §103 Final Rejection 57d Pending Nov 14, 2024
18748846 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING SHARDED DATA MOSER, BRUCE M 2154 §103 Non-Final OA 12d Pending Jun 20, 2024
18749515 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TIERED SYNCHRONIZATION FILIPCZYK, MARCIN R 2153 §103 Final Rejection 32d overdue Pending Jun 20, 2024
18749115 DECOUPLED DATABASE SEARCH SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE RICHARDSON, JAMES E 2169 §103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Jun 20, 2024
18749035 DECOUPLED DATABASE SEARCH SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE MOBIN, HASANUL 2168 §103 Final Rejection 31d overdue Pending Jun 20, 2024
18748921 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING DATA STREAMS JAMI, HARES 2164 §103 Non-Final OA 40d Pending Jun 20, 2024
18664907 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA MIGRATION HARMON, COURTNEY N 2159 §103 Final Rejection 29d Pending May 15, 2024
18328853 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING QUERIES IN A DATA LAKE HOANG, KEN 2168 §103 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Jun 05, 2023
18328953 DATABASE SYSTEMS AND METHODS WITH ASYMMETRIC NODES GHAFFARI, ABU Z 2195 §103 Non-Final OA 44d overdue Pending Jun 05, 2023

Managing Mongodb Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month