Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026

MongoDB Inc.

8 pending office actions • 4 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 17 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (25%)
4
Medium (50%)
2
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (12%)
§103 only3 (38%)
§102 only1 (12%)
Double-patenting only2 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
5
Information Tech
62% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
3
Business / Other
38% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HOLDER, BRADLEY W 2 83.7% +62.5%
FILIPCZYK, MARCIN R 2 64.5% +37.2%
RAAB, CHRISTOPHER J 1 76.8% +14.6%
HARMON, COURTNEY N 1 62.6% +9.0%
YU, JAE UN 1 89.8% +9.8%
GHAFFARI, ABU Z 1 79.2% +47.0%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19208924 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING PRIVATE SET INTERSECTION IN DATABASES HOLDER, BRADLEY W
19208892 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING PRIVATE SET INTERSECTION IN DATABASES HOLDER, BRADLEY W
18748997 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING DATA STREAMS YU, JAE UN

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18328953 DATABASE SYSTEMS AND METHODS WITH ASYMMETRIC NODES GHAFFARI, ABU Z 44d overdue
19347529 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BLOCK PROCESSING TIME SERIES INTEGRATION RAAB, CHRISTOPHER J

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18328953 DATABASE SYSTEMS AND METHODS WITH ASYMMETRIC NODES GHAFFARI, ABU Z 44d overdue
18749515 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TIERED SYNCHRONIZATION FILIPCZYK, MARCIN R 32d overdue
19347529 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BLOCK PROCESSING TIME SERIES INTEGRATION RAAB, CHRISTOPHER J
19208924 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING PRIVATE SET INTERSECTION IN DATABASES HOLDER, BRADLEY W
19208892 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING PRIVATE SET INTERSECTION IN DATABASES HOLDER, BRADLEY W
19194782 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA REQUEST CONVERSION FILIPCZYK, MARCIN R

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2153 2
2156 1
2159 1
2195 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19347529 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BLOCK PROCESSING TIME SERIES INTEGRATION RAAB, CHRISTOPHER J 2156 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 01, 2025
19208924 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING PRIVATE SET INTERSECTION IN DATABASES HOLDER, BRADLEY W DP Non-Final OA Pending May 15, 2025
19208892 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING PRIVATE SET INTERSECTION IN DATABASES HOLDER, BRADLEY W DP Non-Final OA Pending May 15, 2025
19194782 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA REQUEST CONVERSION FILIPCZYK, MARCIN R 2153 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Apr 30, 2025
19194833 TECHNIQUES FOR DYNAMICALLY SCALING HARDWARE CAPACITY USED TO HOST DATA PARTITIONS OF A DATABASE HARMON, COURTNEY N 2159 §103 Final Rejection 12d Pending Apr 30, 2025
18749515 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TIERED SYNCHRONIZATION FILIPCZYK, MARCIN R 2153 §103 Final Rejection 32d overdue Pending Jun 20, 2024
18748997 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING DATA STREAMS YU, JAE UN §102 Non-Final OA Pending Jun 20, 2024
18328953 DATABASE SYSTEMS AND METHODS WITH ASYMMETRIC NODES GHAFFARI, ABU Z 2195 §103§112 Final Rejection 44d overdue Pending Jun 05, 2023

Managing MongoDB Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month