Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/755,146

IN-VEHICLE COMMUNICATION DEVICE, COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT SERVER, PROGRAM, COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, AND COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 26, 2024
Priority
Dec 28, 2021 — JP 2021-214979 +1 more
Examiner
LO, DIANE LEE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Denso Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
859 granted / 959 resolved
+29.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
978
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§103
55.8%
+15.8% vs TC avg
§102
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§112
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 959 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This is response to Application 18/755,146 filed on 06/26/24 in which claims 1-25 are presented for examination. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 13-20 and 22-25 allowed. Claims 2, 3, and 7-12 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 4-6, and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tieman (US 2015/0174765 A1). 1. Regarding claims 1 and 21, Tieman teaches an in-vehicle communication device (Fig. 1 and 10 vehicle having actuation package) for use with a target vehicle comprising: a communication device which includes a plurality of communication modules each for a respective one of a plurality of discrete communication lines (Fig. 1 and 10); and a power supply controller (Fig. 1 Paragraph [0045] controller and power supply) which, when the target vehicle is stopped, works to analyze states of communication in the communication lines to select at least one of the communication lines which is available as an activation line used for remote activation of the in-vehicle communication device made by a communication management server (Fig. 1 and 10), the power supply controller also working to place a target communication module that is one of the communication modules which corresponds to the activation line in a standby mode in which the target communication module is kept powered on and enabled only to receive a request signal from the communication management server, the power supply controller also placing the remaining communication modules other than the target communication module in a rest mode in which the remaining communication modules are kept powered off (Paragraph [0045] actuation command; remote control; convert commands into specific servo motor commands that provision actuating power). 2. Regarding claim 4, Tieman teaches, wherein the power supply controller works to notify the communication management server of the activation line in advance (Fig. 1 and 10, Paragraph [0045] actuation command; remote control; convert commands into specific servo motor commands that provision actuating power). 3. Regarding claim 5, Tieman teaches wherein the power supply controller is responsive to an activation request received from the communication management server through the activation line to supply electrical power to all the communication modules to bring all the communication modules to an activation mode in which data communication is available (Fig. 1 and 10, abstract, Paragraph [0045] actuation command; remote control; features or functions activated remotely). 4. Regarding claim 6, Tieman teaches, wherein the power supply controller is responsive to a communication-line change request, as received from the communication management server using the activation line, to change the activation line to a second activation line that is one of the communication lines and places one of the communication modules which corresponds to the second activation line in the standby mode, while placing the remaining communication modules in the reset mode (Fig. 1 and 10, abstract, Paragraph [0045] actuation command; remote control; features or functions activated remotely). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure: Kang (US 2021/0171027 A1) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DIANE LEE LO whose telephone number is (571)270-1952. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8 am - 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Faruk Hamza can be reached at (571)272-7969. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DIANE L LO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2466
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 26, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700962
ACTIVATING POSITIONING SRS DURING DRX INACTIVE TIME
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695562
APPARATUS FOR COMMUNICATION AND SENSING
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695532
CLOCK SOURCE SELECTION METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695476
ARBITRARY SIGNAL GENERATION AND ACQUISITION DEVICE WITH MULTI-CHANNEL SHARED BANDWIDTH
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689922
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AI/ML BASED BEAM MANAGEMENT
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+7.8%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 959 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month