Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/756,992

DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 27, 2024
Priority
Jun 28, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0083504
Examiner
MENZ, DOUGLAS M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
686 granted / 776 resolved
+28.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
807
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
52.1%
+12.1% vs TC avg
§102
36.2%
-3.8% vs TC avg
§112
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 776 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 21-39 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Byun et al. (US 2018/0123078). Regarding claim 21, Byun discloses a display apparatus comprising: a substrate including a display area having a plurality of sub-pixels (figs. 2-3 and Abstract); at least one thin film transistor disposed in each sub pixel (fig. 2 and paragraph 0045); a light emitting device disposed in each sub-pixel, the light emitting device including an anode electrode (180,fig. 2 and paragraph 0062), an organic layer (210, fig. 2 and paragraph 0078), and a cathode electrode (220, fig. 2 and paragraph 0078) stacked in order (fig. 2); a first structure disposed between adjacent sub-pixels of the plurality of sub-pixels (200c and portion of layer 210 on top, fig. 2); a second structure disposed between the adjacent sub-pixels of the plurality of sub-pixels (175, 178, fig. 2); and an auxiliary electrode under the second structure (170, fig. 2 and paragraph 0046), wherein the first structure includes a first layer (200c, fig. 2) and a second layer (portion of layer 210 on top of 200c, fig. 2) on the first layer, the cathode electrode being disconnected by the first structure between the adjacent sub-pixels of the plurality of sub-pixels (CH6 area, fig. 2), wherein the second structure includes a third layer (175, fig. 2) and a fourth layer (178, fig. 2) on the third layer, wherein the auxiliary electrode (170, fig. 2) under the second structure is electrically connected to the cathode electrode (fig. 2 and paragraph 0078, and wherein at least one of the first layer and the second layer of the first structure is made of a same material as at least one of the third layer and the fourth layer of the second structure (layer 200c and layer 178, fig. 2 and paragraphs 0080, 0066). Regarding claim 22, Byun further discloses wherein the cathode electrode (220, fig. 2) extends from the light emitting device to the auxiliary electrode (170, fig. 2), and wherein a portion of the cathode electrode contacted to the auxiliary electrode is located at a different height from a portion of the cathode electrode over the anode electrode (fig. 2). Regarding claim 23, Byun further discloses wherein the portion of the cathode electrode is contacted to at least one of the third layer and the fourth layer (fig. 2). Regarding claim 24, Byun further discloses wherein the organic layer is disconnected from the first structure or the second structure (fig. 2). Regarding claim 25, Byun further discloses a bank between the adjacent sub-pixels of the plurality of sub-pixels, wherein the first structure is located on the bank (200a, 200b, 200c, fig. 2 and paragraph 0075). Regarding claim 26, Byun further discloses wherein the first structure is provided in plural, and wherein the plurality of first structure are located between the plurality of sub-pixels (fig. 2 shows one, fig. 3 shows array). Regarding claim 27, Byun further discloses wherein at least one of the first structure and the second structure has an undercut shape (175, fig. 2 and paragraph 0065). Regarding claim 28, Byun further discloses wherein the cathode electrode is located below an overhang formed by the undercut shape of the at least one of the first structure and the second structure (220, fig. 2 and paragraph 0065). Regarding claim 29, Byun further discloses wherein the first structure includes the undercut shape, and the second layer overhangs the first layer of the first structure (fig. 2). Regarding claim 30, Byun further discloses wherein a width of a bottom of the fourth layer (178, fig. 2) is different from a width of a top of the third layer (175, fig. 2). Regarding claim 31, Byun further discloses wherein a height location of the first structure as a disconnection unit and a height location of the second structure as a blocking layer are different (fig. 2). Regarding claim 32, Byun further discloses wherein the first structure and the second structure are arranged in a same direction between the adjacent sub-pixels of the plurality of sub-pixels (fig. 2). Regarding claim 33, Byun further discloses an encapsulation layer on the light emitting device, the first structure, and the second structure, wherein a portion of the encapsulation layer is disposed under an overhang formed by an undercut shape of at least one of the first structure and the second structure (fig. 2 and paragraph 0088). Regarding claim 34, Byun further discloses wherein at least one of the first structure and the second structure includes a metal layer as an uppermost layer thereof, and wherein at least one of the second layer and the fourth layer is the metal layer (cathode portion 220 on 200c of first structure can be considered the second layer of the first structure, which is metal, fig. 2). Regarding claim 35, Byun further discloses wherein the metal layer as the uppermost layer of the second structure is a portion of the cathode electrode (cathode portion 220 on 175 of second structure can be considered the uppermost layer of the second structure, which is metal, fig. 2). Regarding claim 36, Byun further discloses wherein the metal layer as the uppermost layer of the first structure is a portion of the cathode electrode (cathode portion 220 on 200c of first structure can be considered the second layer of the first structure, which is metal, fig. 2). Regarding claim 37, Byun further discloses wherein the metal layer of the at least one of the first structure and the second structure forms an overhang by an undercut shape of the at least one of the first structure and the second structure (area around C, fig. 2). Regarding claim 38, Byun further discloses wherein the metal layer of the at least one of the first structure and the second structure is disconnected from the cathode electrode (area around C, fig. 2). Regarding claim 39, Byun further discloses wherein the auxiliary electrode is formed of a same metal as that of at least one of a source and a drain (paragraph 0054). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 40 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Byun et al. (US 2018/0123078). Regarding claim 40, Byun discloses the display apparatus of claim 33, as mentioned above. Byun further discloses that an encapsulation layer may be utilized from various materials generally known to those in the art (paragraph 0088). Byun does not explicitly disclose wherein the encapsulation layer includes a first encapsulation layer and a third encapsulation layer including an inorganic material, and a second encapsulation layer disposed between the first encapsulation layer and the third encapsulation layer and including an organic material, and wherein the first encapsulation layer is disposed on a lateral surface of at least one of the first structure and the second structure. However, multiple encapsulation layers are common in the art and would therefore be deemed obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US Patent Application Publication 2019/0140039 discloses a relevant display incorporating an auxiliary electrode and a partition structure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DOUGLAS M MENZ whose telephone number is (571)272-1877. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jacob Choi can be reached at 469-295-9060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DOUGLAS M MENZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2897 6/27/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677534
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12666821
Display Substrate and Display Apparatus
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666602
SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666676
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12652910
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+4.6%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 776 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month