Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/757,596

MULTI-DIRECTIONAL HEATSINK COOLING SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 28, 2024
Examiner
MUIR, MATTHEW SINCLAIR
Art Unit
2841
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
89 granted / 127 resolved
+2.1% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
149
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
55.7%
+15.7% vs TC avg
§102
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
§112
16.9%
-23.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 127 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2, 5-11, 19-20 and 23-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bailey (US 9643233 B2) in view of Yu (US 20100319880 A1). As to Claim 1, Bailey discloses: A multi-directional heatsink cooling system for cooling a device (cooling system for server 106; Fig. 1b), the multi-directional heatsink cooling system comprising: a heatsink base 258 in a first plane (258 base of heatsink 248, see Fig. 4a), the heatsink base 258 connected to a device requiring cooling 204a-204b (col. 8, Lines 1-3 “a base 258 with a conductive surface 260 for receiving thermal energy from a compute component 204a-204b (FIG. 3A) such as a CPU”); a plurality of heatsink fins (finest 262) attached to the heatsink base 258 in a perpendicular or parallel orientation to the first plane (fins 264 of finest 262 are perpendicular to base 258), the plurality of heatsink fins 262 arranged to accept external cooling in multiple directions (see first 209 and second 211 air flows of Fig. 4a); two or more air diverters (highlighted portions of shroud 232), each air diverter associated with cooling the plurality of heatsink fins 262 in a single air path of a plurality of air paths (first highlighted portion directs 211, second directs 209), each air path associated with exactly one of the multiple directions of the heatsink fins 262 and thereby cool the plurality of heatsink fins 262 (211 in one direction, 209 in other direction). PNG media_image1.png 558 874 media_image1.png Greyscale Bailey does not disclose: a plurality of heat pipes extending through the plurality of heatsink fins, the plurality of heat pipes connected to the heatsink base. However, Yu discloses: a plurality of heat pipes 32,34 extending through the plurality of heatsink fins (fins 21-23), the plurality of heat pipes 32,34 connected to the heatsink base 10 (Par. 0012 “The heat dissipation device includes a base 10 thermally connecting with electronic component(s) (not shown) for absorbing heat therefrom, a heat sink 20 mounted on the base 10 and a heat pipe unit 30”); in order to quickly absorb and transfer heat (Par. 0021). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the related art(s) before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Bailey as further suggested by Yu e.g., providing: a plurality of heat pipes extending through the plurality of heatsink fins, the plurality of heat pipes connected to the heatsink base; in order to quickly absorb and transfer heat. As to Claim 2, the obvious modification of Bailey in view of Yu discloses: wherein one or more cooling fans are associated with each air path 209,211 of the plurality of air paths (col. 8, Lines 25-28 “the first air flow 209 is supported by one or more dedicated fans and the second air flows 211 is supported by one or more dedicated fans”; Bailey). As to Claim 5, the obvious modification of Bailey in view of Yu discloses: wherein the device requiring cooling 204a is an electronic device (col. 8, Lines 3 “compute component 204a-204b (FIG. 3A) such as a CPU”; Bailey). As to Claim 6, the obvious modification of Bailey in view of Yu discloses: wherein the device requiring cooling is a motherboard or a graphical card (col. 6, Lines 46-48 “204a-204d (FIG. 3A) that are mounted to a bottom surface 253 of the server chassis 202 or a motherboard 254 on the bottom surface 253”; 204a mounted on motherboard; Bailey). As to Claim 7, the obvious modification of Bailey in view of Yu discloses: wherein the plurality of heatsink fins (fins 264 of finest 262 of Bailey) are stacked parallel to one another in a single plane (264 are stacked horizontally in a single plane). As to Claim 8, the obvious modification of Bailey in view of Yu discloses: wherein the plurality of heatsink fins 264 are stacked via one or more stacking features molded into each heatsink fin 264 of the plurality of heatsink fins (each fin 264 of finest 262 are attached to base 258 and stacked horizontally, brazing or press fitting provides a molded feature on each fin to provide stacking/attaching to base; col. 8, Lines 9-11 “Each cooling fin 264 is attached to the base 258 by solder brazing or press fitting”; Bailey). As to Claim 9, the obvious modification of Bailey in view of Yu discloses: wherein the plurality of heatsink fins (21-23 of Yu, correspond to 264 of Bailey) are perforated with a plurality of apertures (through holes 24, 27), and one or more of the apertures 24,27 provide for the heat pipes 32,34 to extend through the plurality of heatsink fins 21-23 (Par. 0018 “the condensing sections 322 of the first heat pipes 32 can be received in the first through holes 24”; “The condensing sections 342 of the second heat pipes 34 can be received in the second through holes 27”; Yu). As to Claim 10, the obvious modification of Bailey in view of Yu discloses: wherein the heat pipes (32,34 of Yu) are soldered or brazed to the heatsink fins 21-23 and the heatsink base 10 (Par. 0021 “Since the solidified soldering layers 40 can well fill up the air clearances between the heat pipes 32, 34 and the base 10, a lowest thermal resistance between the heat pipe 32, 34 and the base 10 is obtained”; at least indirectly soldered to fins via soldering to base 10; Yu). As to Claim 11, the obvious modification of Bailey in view of Yu discloses: wherein the heatsink base (258 of Bailey), the plurality of heatsink fins (264 Bailey), and the heat pipes (32,34 of Yu) are bonded via a heating process (col. 8, Lines 9-10 “Each cooling fin 264 is attached to the base 258 by solder brazing”; Bailey; Par. 0021 “Since the solidified soldering layers 40 can well fill up the air clearances between the heat pipes 32, 34 and the base 10, a lowest thermal resistance between the heat pipe 32, 34 and the base 10 is obtained”; Yu; soldering/solder brazing involves heat). As to Claim 19, Bailey discloses: A multi-directional heatsink cooling system for cooling a device (cooling system for server 106; Fig. 1b), the multi-directional heatsink comprising: a heatsink base 258 in a first plane (258 base of heatsink 248, see Fig. 4a), the heatsink base 258 connected to a device requiring cooling 204a-204b (col. 8, Lines 1-3 “a base 258 with a conductive surface 260 for receiving thermal energy from a compute component 204a-204b (FIG. 3A) such as a CPU”); a plurality of heatsink fins (finest 262) attached to the heatsink base 258 in a perpendicular or parallel orientation to the first plane (fins 264 of finest 262 are perpendicular to base 258), the plurality of heatsink fins 262 arranged to accept external cooling in multiple directions (see first 209 and second 211 air flows of Fig. 4a); two or more air diverters (highlighted portions of shroud 232), each air diverter associated with cooling the plurality of heatsink fins 262 in a single air path of a plurality of air paths (first highlighted portion directs 211, second directs 209), each air path associated with exactly one of the multiple directions (211 in one direction, 209 in other direction), wherein the plurality of heatsink fins 262 are formed in two or more different shapes (see Fig. 4a, fins 264 on near and far side are different shape than fins in middle portion) to allow the plurality of heatsink fins 262 to separate air from different air paths 209,211 in order to enhance cooling of the heatsink fins 262 (present construction with different shaped fins allows for both air paths 209,211 to pass through finest 262 and provide cooling). PNG media_image1.png 558 874 media_image1.png Greyscale Bailey does not disclose: a plurality of heat pipes extending through the plurality of heatsink fins, the plurality of heat pipes connected to the heatsink base. However, Yu discloses: a plurality of heat pipes 32,34 extending through the plurality of heatsink fins (fins 21-23), the plurality of heat pipes 32,34 connected to the heatsink base 10 (Par. 0012 “The heat dissipation device includes a base 10 thermally connecting with electronic component(s) (not shown) for absorbing heat therefrom, a heat sink 20 mounted on the base 10 and a heat pipe unit 30”); in order to quickly absorb and transfer heat (Par. 0021). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the related art(s) before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Bailey as further suggested by Yu e.g., providing: a plurality of heat pipes extending through the plurality of heatsink fins, the plurality of heat pipes connected to the heatsink base; in order to quickly absorb and transfer heat. As to Claim 20, the obvious modification of Bailey in view of Yu discloses: wherein one or more cooling fans are associated with each air path 209,211 of the plurality of air paths (col. 8, Lines 25-28 “the first air flow 209 is supported by one or more dedicated fans and the second air flows 211 is supported by one or more dedicated fans”; Bailey). As to Claim 23, the obvious modification of Bailey in view of Yu discloses: wherein the device requiring cooling 204a is an electronic device (col. 8, Lines 3 “compute component 204a-204b (FIG. 3A) such as a CPU”; Bailey). As to Claim 24, the obvious modification of Bailey in view of Yu discloses: wherein the device requiring cooling is a motherboard or a graphical card (col. 6, Lines 46-48 “204a-204d (FIG. 3A) that are mounted to a bottom surface 253 of the server chassis 202 or a motherboard 254 on the bottom surface 253”; 204a mounted on motherboard; Bailey). As to Claim 25, the obvious modification of Bailey in view of Yu discloses: wherein one or more heatsink fins (262 of Bailey) form a plenum (tunnel 213) allowing air to ingress or egress the plurality of heatsink fins 262 and thereby enhance cooling of the plurality of heatsink fins 262 (213 provides pathway for airflow 211, provides cooling). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-4 and 21-22 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 12-18 will be allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: As to claims 6-10 and 12-14, the allowability resides in the overall structure and functionality of the device as recited in the dependent claims 3 and 21, including all of the limitations of their base claims and intervening claims, and at least in part, because claims 3 and 21 recite the following limitations: “further comprising two or more cooling fans, the two or more cooling fans including a first cooling fan and a second cooling fan, the first cooling fan engaged to cool the multi-directional heatsink at all times via a first air path, and the second cooling fan engaged to cool the multi-directional heatsink upon an increased cooling demand via a second air path.” – claims 3 and 21. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: As to claims 12-18, the allowability resides in the overall structure and functionality of the apparatus in the independent claim 12, and at least in part, because claim 12 recites the limitations: “wherein each of the plurality of heatsink fins is formed such that a plenum is present in each of the heatsink fins and when the plurality of heatsink fins are stacked a greater plenum is formed via conjunction of the plenums present in each of the plurality of heatsink fins, the greater plenum allowing air directed along each air path to exit the plurality of heatsink fins via the greater plenum and thereby cool the plurality of heatsink fins.” – claim 12. Wiltzius (US 7933119 B2) discloses a fan directing airflow throughout a heatsink, however does not disclose a plurality of fans cooling as claimed. Babcock (US 9609785 B1) discloses a plurality of fans directing airflow through multiple directions of a heatsink, however does not disclose one fan on at all times while another is selectively engaged upon an increased cooling demand. Tunks (US 20240138117 A1) discloses a plurality of fins within a heatsink, however does not disclose a plenum in each fin that further forms a greater plenum. Guerrero (US 6450250 B2) discloses a central opening within a fin stack for accommodating a shaft, however does not disclose a plenum in each fin that further forms a greater plenum for each air path. The aforementioned limitations in combination with all remaining limitations of claims 3, 12 and 21, are believed to render said claims 3, 12 and 21 and all claims dependent therefrom allowable over the prior art of record, taken alone or in combination. Further, Examiner has not identified any double patenting issues. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW S MUIR whose telephone number is (571)270-1329. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8 am - 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jayprakash Gandhi can be reached at 571-272-3740. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW SINCLAIR MUIR/ Examiner, Art Unit 2841 /Jayprakash N Gandhi/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2841
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 28, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707605
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701680
Automation Device For An Electric Drive Device And An Electric Drive Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12690176
POWER MODULE HAVING AT LEAST ONE POWER UNIT
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12665500
POWER CONVERTER APPARATUS FOR VEHICLE
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666573
HEAT DISSIPATION APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.4%)
2y 7m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 127 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month