Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 18/760,036

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 01, 2024
Priority
Dec 15, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0183449
Examiner
XU, ZHIJUN
Art Unit
2818
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
58 granted / 75 resolved
+9.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
119
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
67.8%
+27.8% vs TC avg
§102
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
§112
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 75 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-8 and 11-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim et al. (WO 2022025365 and US 20230284512 as English translation), hereinafter Kim. Regarding claim 1, Kim teaches a display device (Abstract) comprising: a substrate (fig. 5, first base portion 110 of display substrate 10; para. 0124); a light emitting element layer (light emitting layer OL; para. 0140) disposed on the substrate (110) and including a plurality of light emitting elements (first light emitting element ED1, second light emitting element ED2; para. 0140); and a light control layer (color conversion substrate 30, filler 70; para. 0091) disposed on the light emitting element layer (OL), wherein the light control layer (30, 70) includes: a light transmitting film (70, where light transmit) including a plurality of regions (first light transmitting area TA1, second light transmitting area TA2; para. 0111) spaced apart from each other; a first stopper layer (second capping layer 393; para. 0292) disposed on the light transmitting film (70); and a light blocking film (bank pattern 370; para. 0292) including a plurality of regions (light blocking area BA; para. 0110) on the first stopper layer (393) and disposed between the regions (TA1, TA2) of the light transmitting film (70), respectively, wherein the first stopper layer (393) covers upper surfaces and side surfaces of the regions of the light transmitting film (upper surfaces and side surfaces of 70 in TA1, TA2). Regarding claim 2, Kim further teaches the display device of claim 1, wherein the first stopper layer (fig. 5, 393) is conformally disposed on the regions of the light transmitting film (70 in TA1, TA2). Regarding claim 3, Kim further teaches the display device of claim 1, wherein each of the regions of the light blocking film (fig. 5, 370 in BA) includes a protrusion portion (370 above 393) protruding from an upper surface of the first stopper layer (upper surface of 393) or the upper surfaces of the regions of the light transmitting film. Regarding claim 4, Kim further teaches the display device of claim 3, further comprising an overcoat layer (fig. 5, second color filter 233, first optical pattern LR1, second optical pattern LR2; para. 0223) disposed on the first stopper layer (393) and the light blocking film (370) and covering an upper surface and side surfaces of the protrusion portion (upper surface and side surfaces of 370). Regarding claim 5, Kim further teaches the display device of claim 1, further comprising a second stopper layer (fig. 5, third color filter 235; para. 0134) disposed on the regions (BA) of the light blocking film (370), wherein the second stopper layer (235) includes a plurality of patterns (pattern on BA) respectively disposed on the regions (BA) of the light blocking film (370). Regarding claim 6, Kim further teaches the display device of claim 5, wherein the second stopper layer (fig. 5, 235) includes an inorganic material (pigment, which can be inorganic material; para. 0207), and the light transmitting film (70) includes an organic material (organic material; para. 0099). Regarding claim 7, Kim further teaches the display device of claim 1, wherein the light control layer (fig. 5, 30, 70) further includes a light transmitting lower film (upper inorganic layer 175; para. 0295) including a plurality of regions (TA1, TA2) respectively disposed below the regions (TA1, TA2) of the light transmitting film (70). Regarding claim 8, Kim further teaches the display device of claim 7, wherein the light transmitting lower film (fig. 5, 175) includes an inorganic material (inorganic layer), and the light transmitting film (70) includes an organic material (organic material; para. 0099). Regarding claim 11, Kim teaches a display device (Abstract) comprising: a substrate (fig. 5, first base portion 110 of display substrate 10; para. 0124); a light emitting element layer (light emitting layer OL; para. 0140) disposed on the substrate (110) and including a plurality of light emitting elements (first light emitting element ED1, second light emitting element ED2; para. 0140); and a light control layer (color conversion substrate 30, filler 70; para. 0091) disposed on the light emitting element layer (OL), wherein the light control layer (30, 70) includes: a light transmitting film (70, where light transmit) including a plurality of first openings (openings around light blocking area BA; para. 0110); a first stopper layer (second capping layer 393; para. 0292) disposed on the light transmitting film (70); and a light blocking film (bank pattern 370; para. 0292) including a plurality of regions (BA) disposed on the first stopper layer (393) respectively in the plurality of first openings (openings around BA), wherein the first stopper layer (393) covers an upper surface of the light transmitting film (upper surface of 70) and inner surfaces of the plurality of first openings (inner surfaces of openings around BA). Regarding claim 12, Kim further teaches the display device of claim 11, wherein the first stopper layer (fig. 5, 393) is conformally disposed on the regions of the light transmitting film (70 in TA1, TA2). Regarding claim 13, Kim further teaches the display device of claim 11, wherein each of the regions of the light blocking film (fig. 5, 370 in BA) includes a protrusion portion (370 above 393) protruding from an upper surface of the first stopper layer (upper surface of 393) or the upper surfaces of the regions of the light transmitting film. Regarding claim 14, Kim further teaches the display device of claim 13, further comprising an overcoat layer (fig. 5, second color filter 233, first optical pattern LR1, second optical pattern LR2; para. 0223) disposed on the first stopper layer (393) and the light blocking film (370) and covering an upper surface and side surfaces of the protrusion portion (upper surface and side surfaces of 370). Regarding claim 15, Kim further teaches the display device of claim 11, further comprising a second stopper layer (fig. 5, third color filter 235; para. 0134) disposed on the regions (BA) of the light blocking film (370), wherein the second stopper layer (235) includes a plurality of patterns (pattern on BA) respectively disposed on the regions (BA) of the light blocking film (370). Regarding claim 16, Kim further teaches the display device of claim 15, wherein the second stopper layer (fig. 5, 235) includes an inorganic material (pigment, which can be inorganic material; para. 0207), and the light transmitting film (70) includes an organic material (organic material; para. 0099). Regarding claim 17, Kim further teaches the display device of claim 11, wherein the light control layer (fig. 5, 30, 70) further includes a light transmitting lower film (lower inorganic layer 171; para. 0191) disposed below the light transmitting film (70) and including a plurality of second openings (opening for non-emission area NLA downward; para. 0208), and the plurality of second openings (opening for NLA) are formed integrally with the plurality of first openings (opening for BA), respectively. Regarding claim 18, Kim further teaches the display device of claim 17, wherein the light transmitting lower film (fig. 5, 171) includes an inorganic material (inorganic layer), and the light transmitting film (70) includes an organic material (organic material; para. 0099). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 9-10 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim in view of Lee et al. (US 20220320189). Regarding claim 9, Kim teaches the display device of claim 7 including the light transmitting lower film (fig. 5, 175). Kim fails to explicitly teach a dam disposed on one side of the plurality of light emitting elements on the substrate and including the same material as the light transmitting lower film. However, Lee teaches a dam (Lee: fig. 15, first dam portion DP1; para. 0237) disposed on one side (outside) of the plurality of light emitting elements (Lee: organic light-emitting diode OLED; para. 0100, similar to ED1 of Kim) on the substrate (Lee: substrate 100; para. 0074) and including the same material (Lee: DP1 includes same first and second inorganic encapsulation layer 131, 133; para. 0094) as the light transmitting lower film (Lee: 133, similar to 175 of Kim). Lee and Kim are considered to be analogous to the claimed invention because they are in the same field of display devices. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to add a dam as taught by Lee. Doing so would realize a dam to delay external air or moisture from outside (Lee: para. 0251). Regarding claim 10, Kim in view of Lee further teaches the display device of claim 9, wherein the regions of the light transmitting film (Lee: fig. 15, region above OLED, similar to TA1 of Kim) are disposed closer to the plurality of light emitting elements (Lee: OLED) than is the dam (Lee: DP1). Regarding claim 19, Kim teaches the display device of claim 17 including the light transmitting lower film (fig. 5, 171). Kim fails to explicitly teach a dam disposed on one side of the plurality of light emitting elements on the substrate and including the same material as the light transmitting lower film. However, Lee teaches a dam (Lee: fig. 15, first dam portion DP1; para. 0237) disposed on one side (outside) of the plurality of light emitting elements (Lee: organic light-emitting diode OLED; para. 0100, similar to ED1 of Kim) on the substrate (Lee: substrate 100; para. 0074) and including the same material (Lee: DP1 includes same first and second inorganic encapsulation layer 131, 133; para. 0094) as the light transmitting lower film (Lee: 131, similar to 171 of Kim). Lee and Kim are considered to be analogous to the claimed invention because they are in the same field of display devices. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to add a dam as taught by Lee. Doing so would realize a dam to delay external air or moisture from outside (Lee: para. 0251). Regarding claim 20, Kim in view of Lee further teaches the display device of claim1 9, wherein the regions of the light transmitting film (Lee: fig. 15, region above OLED, similar to TA1 of Kim) are disposed closer to the plurality of light emitting elements (Lee: OLED) than is the dam (Lee: DP1). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Yoo et al. (US 20220149108) teaches a light control layer. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZHIJUN XU whose telephone number is (571)270-3447. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 9am-5pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eva Montalvo can be reached at (571) 270-3829. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZHIJUN XU/Examiner, Art Unit 2818 /BRIAN TURNER/Examiner, Art Unit 2818
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 01, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12765268
MANUFACTURING METHOD OF MEMORY DEVICE WITH REMOVAL OF TOP ELECTRODE
5y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12740163
Imaging Device Comprising Pixel Circuit and Light-Emitting Device
5y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733234
METHOD OF FORMING A NANO-FET SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727227
METHOD OF FORMING A NANO-FET SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE HAVING A SPACER WITH A REDUCER SEAM
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12720849
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+11.4%)
3y 8m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 75 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month