Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/760,368

POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL OF POWER STORAGE DEVICE, POWER STORAGE DEVICE, ELECTRICALLY PROPELLED VEHICLE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING POWER STORAGE

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jul 01, 2024
Priority
Apr 28, 2010 — JP 2010-103832 +6 more
Examiner
LAIOS, MARIA J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
526 granted / 762 resolved
+9.0% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 12m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
784
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
55.3%
+15.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§112
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 762 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Claim Status Claim 1 has been cancelled. Claims 2-11 have been added. Support is found in [0123] of the published application. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 2-11 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-8 of U.S. Patent No. 9,899,678 B2 in view of Sakai (US 8795894 B2). US 9,899,678 discloses a positive electrode active material comprising lithium iron phosphate, wherein a grain size of the positive electrode active material is greater than or equal to 10 nm and less than or equal to 100 nm, wherein a surface area per unit mass of the positive electrode active material measured by the BET method is greater than or equal to 24 m.sup.2/g and less than or equal to 27.5 m.sup.2/g, and wherein an X-ray diffraction half width of the positive electrode active material is greater than or equal to 0.13° and less than 0.16°, but does not disclose lithium iron phosphate being further doped with manganese. US9,899,678 further discloses a current collector , a positive electrode, a negative electrode, and the electrolyte and the rate characteristics and a vehicle propelled by the power storage device. Sakai et al. discloses a positive electrode material of AaMbPO4 where M is selected from iron manganese and nickel with are advantageous in view of cost (col. 4 lines 52-58). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill at the time the invention was made to include manganese as an additional dopant because of cost. Claims 2-11 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-10 of U.S. Patent No. 10916774 in view of Sakai (US 8795894 B2). US 10916774 discloses a positive electrode active material comprising lithium iron phosphate, wherein a grain size of the positive electrode active material is greater than or equal to 10 nm and less than or equal to 100 nm, wherein a surface area per unit mass of the positive electrode active material measured by the BET method is greater than or equal to 24 m.sup.2/g and less than or equal to 27.5 m.sup.2/g, and wherein an X-ray diffraction half width of the positive electrode active material is greater than or equal to 0.13° and less than 0.16°, but does not disclose lithium iron phosphate being further doped with manganese. US 10916774 further discloses a current collector , a positive electrode, a negative electrode, and the electrolyte and the rate characteristics and a vehicle propelled by the power storage device. Sakai et al. discloses a positive electrode material of AaMbPO4 where M is selected from iron manganese and nickel with are advantageous in view of cost (col. 4 lines 52-58). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill at the time the invention was made to include manganese as an additional dopant because of cost. Claims 2-11 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-10 of U.S. Patent No. 12027702 B2 in view of Sakai (US 8795894 B2). US 12027702 discloses a positive electrode active material comprising lithium iron phosphate, wherein a grain size of the positive electrode active material is greater than or equal to 10 nm and less than or equal to 100 nm, wherein a surface area per unit mass of the positive electrode active material measured by the BET method is greater than or equal to 24 m.sup.2/g and less than or equal to 27.5 m.sup.2/g, and wherein an X-ray diffraction half width of the positive electrode active material is greater than or equal to 0.13° and less than 0.16°, but does not disclose lithium iron phosphate being further doped with manganese. US 12027702 further discloses a current collector , a positive electrode, a negative electrode, and the electrolyte and the rate characteristics and a vehicle propelled by the power storage device. Sakai et al. discloses a positive electrode material of AaMbPO4 where M is selected from iron manganese and nickel with are advantageous in view of cost (col. 4 lines 52-58). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill at the time the invention was made to include manganese as an additional dopant because of cost. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARIA J LAIOS whose telephone number is (571)272-9808. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 10am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Barbara Gilliam can be reached at 571-272-1330. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Maria Laios/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1727
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 01, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12738526
BATTERY AND BATTERY WITH SPRING PLATE
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738615
Electrolyte Reinjection Method and Electrolyte-Reinjectable Secondary Battery
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738561
CARTRIDGE FOR SECONDARY BATTERY, BATTERY MODULE, AND CARTRIDGE MODULE
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738569
BATTERY PACK THERMAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT ASSEMBLY AND THERMAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT METHOD
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731849
Tray for Secondary Battery and Tray Assembly Comprising the Same
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+18.3%)
3y 12m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 762 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month