Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/762,430

HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAY DEVICE, CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 02, 2024
Priority
Jul 06, 2023 — JP 2023-111119
Examiner
SHIBRU, HELEN
Art Unit
2484
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 10m
Est. Remaining
62%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
455 granted / 772 resolved
+0.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
793
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
§103
56.7%
+16.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
§112
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 772 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 03/202026 has been entered. Response to Amendment The amendments, filed 03/20/2026, have been entered and made of record. Claims 1-6 and 8-12 are pending. Claim 7 was previously cancelled. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 03/20/2026 have been considered but are moot because of the new ground of rejection sets forth below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6 and 8-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over FUKUCHI et al. (US PG PUB 2012/0210254 hereinafter referred as Fukuchi) in view of Kimura et al. (US Pat. No. 10, 719, 121 hereinafter referred as Kimura). Regarding claim 1, Regarding claim 1, Fukuchi discloses a head-mounted display device (see figure 1A) comprising: one or more memories storing instructions (see paragraphs 0053 and 0125a non-transitory computer readable storage medium); and one or more processors capable of executing the instructions causing the head- mounted display device (see paragraphs 0008 and 0125 CPU) to: project a virtual space in a field of view of a user wearing the head-mounted display device (see paragraph 0040 direction of the line of sight of the user); execute control processing to enable a see-through mode to check a real space (see paragraph 0039 see-through screen); and display a virtual object generated based on captured data on a physical object in the real space within the virtual space projected in the field of view of the user (see paragraph 0041 display device displays a series of input images; see also paragraph 0044), wherein the captured data includes data indicating a feature amount of a surrounding real space including the physical object, wherein the virtual object is displayed at a position within the virtual space determined using feature amount (see the response above, figures 4, 17 and paragraphs 0005, 0046, 0057, 0071 and also 0120), and wherein the virtual object is shared with another member participating in the virtual space to allow the another member to view the virtual object (see paragraph 0046 sharing of virtual object; paragraph 0063 object is presented to the user). Claim 1 differs from FUKUCHI in that the claim further requires matching the feature amount included in the captured data with a feature amount detected in the real space to display the virtual object within the virtual space position. In the same field of endeavor Kimura discloses determining a position by matching the feature amount included in the captured data with a feature amount detected in the real space (see col. 6 lines 5-53 collating feature amounts determined from captured image with feature amounts of objects registered in advance; recognizing object identification information associated with feature amounts which best matches the feature amounts of the objects projected in the captured image; and the locations and postures of the objects in the real space; see also figure 4, viewpoint detected; see col. 7 line 45-8 line 8). Therefore, in light of the teaching in Kimura, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify FUKUCHI by adding the feature of matching feature amount included in the captured data with feature amount detected in real space in order to determine whether predetermined object is present in the input recognition area and whether the region of interest within the user interface changes. Regarding claim 2, Fukuchi discloses the virtual object is shared in a form based on a type of the physical object corresponding to the virtual object (see figure 6 and paragraphs 0071-0072). Regarding claim 3, Fukuchi discloses a virtual object generated based on image data on the physical object or text data obtained by performing character recognition on the image data is displayed within the virtual space (see paragraphs 0003, 0039, 0048 and also 0054). Regarding claim 4, Fukuchi discloses the image data or the text data corresponding to the virtual object is posted to an account for a member with which a service having a message posting function is to be shared (see figures 4 and 6; and paragraphs 0063 and 0071). Regarding claim 5, Fukuchi discloses the image data or the text data posted to the account for the member with which the service is to be shared is viewed through a screen for the service displayed within a virtual space projected in a field of view of the member (see figures 0039, 0058 and 0069). Regarding claim 6, Fukuchi discloses a virtual object generated based on three-dimensional data on the physical object is stereoscopically displayed within the virtual space (see paragraphs 0058, 0074 and 0084). Regarding claim 8, Fukuchi discloses the instructions further cause the head-mounted display device to issue an instruction to share the virtual object generated based on the captured data with one or more members participating in the virtual space (see figures 15 and 17 and paragraphs 0115-0116). Regarding claim 9, Fukuchi discloses the instructions further cause the head-mounted display device to receive the captured data from another device (see figure 1A and paragraphs 0038, 0042 and 0044). Regarding claim 10, Fukuchi discloses an image capturing device, wherein the image capturing device generates the captured data by capturing an image of the physical object (see paragraphs 0039 and 0044-0045). Regarding claims 11-12, the limitation of claims 11-12 is found in claim 1. Therefore, claims 11-12 are analyzed and rejected for the same reasons as discussed in claim 1 above. Claims 1-6 and 8-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over FUKUCHI et al. (US PG PUB 2012/0210254 hereinafter referred as Fukuchi) in view of KANEKO (US PG PUB 2023/0377290). The applied reference has a common Assignee with the instant application. Based upon the earlier effectively filed date of the reference, it constitutes prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2). Regarding claim 1, Regarding claim 1, Fukuchi discloses a head-mounted display device (see figure 1A) comprising: one or more memories storing instructions (see paragraphs 0053 and 0125a non-transitory computer readable storage medium); and one or more processors capable of executing the instructions causing the head- mounted display device (see paragraphs 0008 and 0125 CPU) to: project a virtual space in a field of view of a user wearing the head-mounted display device (see paragraph 0040 direction of the line of sight of the user); execute control processing to enable a see-through mode to check a real space (see paragraph 0039 see-through screen); and display a virtual object generated based on captured data on a physical object in the real space within the virtual space projected in the field of view of the user (see paragraph 0041 display device displays a series of input images; see also paragraph 0044), wherein the captured data includes data indicating a feature amount of a surrounding real space including the physical object, wherein the virtual object is displayed at a position within the virtual space determined using feature amount (see the response above, figures 4, 17 and paragraphs 0005, 0046, 0057, 0071 and also 0120), and wherein the virtual object is shared with another member participating in the virtual space to allow the another member to view the virtual object (see paragraph 0046 sharing of virtual object; paragraph 0063 object is presented to the user). Claim 1 differs from FUKUCHI in that the claim further requires matching the feature amount included in the captured data with a feature amount detected in the real space to display the virtual object within the virtual space position. In the same field of endeavor Kaneko discloses determining a position by matching the feature amount included in the captured data with a feature amount detected in the real space (see paragraph 0032). Therefore, in light of the teaching in Kaneko, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify FUKUCHI by adding the feature of matching feature amount included in the captured data with feature amount detected in real space in order to manage conditions for determining a method of providing virtual object to the user in association with identification information. Regarding claim 2, Fukuchi discloses the virtual object is shared in a form based on a type of the physical object corresponding to the virtual object (see figure 6 and paragraphs 0071-0072). Regarding claim 3, Fukuchi discloses a virtual object generated based on image data on the physical object or text data obtained by performing character recognition on the image data is displayed within the virtual space (see paragraphs 0003, 0039, 0048 and also 0054). Regarding claim 4, Fukuchi discloses the image data or the text data corresponding to the virtual object is posted to an account for a member with which a service having a message posting function is to be shared (see figures 4 and 6; and paragraphs 0063 and 0071). Regarding claim 5, Fukuchi discloses the image data or the text data posted to the account for the member with which the service is to be shared is viewed through a screen for the service displayed within a virtual space projected in a field of view of the member (see figures 0039, 0058 and 0069). Regarding claim 6, Fukuchi discloses a virtual object generated based on three-dimensional data on the physical object is stereoscopically displayed within the virtual space (see paragraphs 0058, 0074 and 0084). Regarding claim 8, Fukuchi discloses the instructions further cause the head-mounted display device to issue an instruction to share the virtual object generated based on the captured data with one or more members participating in the virtual space (see figures 15 and 17 and paragraphs 0115-0116). Regarding claim 9, Fukuchi discloses the instructions further cause the head-mounted display device to receive the captured data from another device (see figure 1A and paragraphs 0038, 0042 and 0044). Regarding claim 10, Fukuchi discloses an image capturing device, wherein the image capturing device generates the captured data by capturing an image of the physical object (see paragraphs 0039 and 0044-0045). Regarding claims 11-12, the limitation of claims 11-12 is found in claim 1. Therefore, claims 11-12 are analyzed and rejected for the same reasons as discussed in claim 1 above. This rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 might be overcome by: (1) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(a) that the subject matter disclosed in the reference was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor of this application and is thus not prior art in accordance with 35 U.S.C.102(b)(2)(A); (2) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(b) of a prior public disclosure under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B); or (3) a statement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) establishing that, not later than the effective filing date of the claimed invention, the subject matter disclosed and the claimed invention were either owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person or subject to a joint research agreement. See generally MPEP § 717.02. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HELEN SHIBRU whose telephone number is (571)272-7329. The examiner can normally be reached M-TR 8:00AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, THAI TRAN can be reached at 571 272 7382. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HELEN SHIBRU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2484 May 8, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Sep 15, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Mar 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 21, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 01, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676013
Driver Monitoring Device and Monitoring Program
1y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12670933
Digital video production systems and methods
11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12640023
CAMERA CAPABLE OF SELECTIVE DATA TRANSMISSION FOR PRIVACY PROTECTION
2y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12639947
PERSONALIZED GENERATIVE VIDEO SUMMARIZATION
1y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633313
SCRIPT BASED VIDEO EFFECTS FOR LIVE VIDEO
2y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
62%
With Interview (+3.1%)
3y 11m (~1y 10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 772 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month