Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Examiner: SHIBRU, HELEN

Tech Center 3700 • Art Units: 2484 2621 3772

This examiner grants 59% of resolved cases

Analysis

SHIBRU, HELEN is an examiner in Tech Center 3700 and Art Unit 2484. The data shows 780 resolved cases for this examiner. The allowance rate is 59.1 percent, which indicates the proportion of grants among resolved applications. Practitioners can use this 59.1 percent figure to evaluate the probability of a successful outcome. The count of 780 resolved cases provides a basis for understanding the examiner's historical trends in this art unit.

The interview lift is 3.5 percent. This metric represents the difference in the allowance rate when an interview is conducted compared to the overall rate of 59.1 percent. An interview lift of 3.5 percent suggests that direct communication with the examiner is associated with a modest increase in the probability of receiving a grant. Practitioners may choose to utilize interviews to address specific rejections or to clarify technical aspects of the claims. This 3.5 percent lift is a factor to consider when developing a prosecution strategy.

The median days to allowance is 1425. This number represents the middle value of the time taken from the start of prosecution to the issuance of a patent. A median of 1425 days provides a timeline for applicants to manage their expectations regarding the duration of the process. The combination of the 59.1 percent allowance rate and the 1425-day pendency characterizes the current prosecution environment. These metrics help in planning the resources and time required for applications assigned to this examiner.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

59.1%
Allow Rate
-10.9% vs TC avg
796
Total Applications
+3.5%
Interview Lift
1425
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 780 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

7.6%
§101 Eligibility
28.5%
§102 Novelty
45.6%
§103 Obviousness
9.5%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
19229035 VIDEO PROCESSING DEVICE, VIDEO PROCESSING METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM Non-Final OA NEC Corporation
19001793 INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND PROGRAM Non-Final OA NEC Corporation
19270662 COMMUNICATION TERMINAL, IMAGE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF DISPLAYING IMAGE Non-Final OA Ricoh Company, Ltd.
17702532 IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS THAT CARRIES OUT NOISE REDUCTION PROCESS WHEN PLAYING VIDEO, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM Final Rejection CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA
18978654 VIDEO PROCESSING METHOD, APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM Non-Final OA Beijing Zitiao Network Technology Co., Ltd.
18853573 TEMPORAL INTRA MODE PREDICTION Non-Final OA INTERDIGITAL MADISON PATENT HOLDINGS, SAS

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month