Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/764,981

MOBILE, SCALABLE SELF-POWERED AGRIVOLTAIC SYSTEM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 05, 2024
Examiner
PANDE, ASHUTOSH
Art Unit
3668
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
The Regents of the University of California
OA Round
2 (Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
5 granted / 7 resolved
+19.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
39
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
§103
65.8%
+25.8% vs TC avg
§102
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
§112
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 7 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims This Office Action is in response to the amendments filed on 01/20/2026. Claims 1, 7, 8, 12-14 and 20 are amended. Claims 19 is incorrectly identified as amended. Claims 1-20 are presently pending and examined. Response to Arguments Prior Art Rejection Applicant’s amendments and accompanying arguments, see remarks, filed 01/20/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-20 under 103 have been fully considered. Examiner does not agree with applicant that Yael's panels are photovoltaic panels, not shade panels as per Claim 1. Applicant in Claim 12, cites limitation “said solar panels configured to provide shade to crops”. However, in view of the amendments to Claim 1 and to further prosecution, upon further consideration, new ground of rejection is made in view of Yossi Fisher et. al. US20240235462 (“Fisher”) and Clayton Jay Allen et. al. US 20210242822 (“Allen”). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lavee Ephrath Yael WO 2023026278 A1 (“Yael”) in view of Yossi Fisher et. al. US20240235462 (“Fisher”) and Clayton Jay Allen et. al. US 20210242822 (“Allen”) As per Claim 1, Yael discloses, A mobile platform, comprising: a platform with a top surface and a bottom surface; (see at least Fig. 3, [Page 3, 4th para]] Fig. 1 and 1a depict two views of a side section of an agrivoltaic moving system according to the present invention. The solar panels 20 fitted with a solar tracking axis are mounted on a movable irrigation construction 30 with irrigating distributors 40.) a plurality of mobile support towers coupled to the platform, said towers capable of moving the platform from one location to another (see at least Fig. 1, Fig. 1a, Fig. 3, [Page 3, 4th para] The system moves using a moving construction 32 as used in existing moving irrigation systems, [Page 7, 2nd para] The photovoltaic panels of the moving system could be placed in a manner that shades the area that was just irrigated, and [Page 7, 3rd para] The moving system comprises a plurality of photovoltaic solar panels and is mounted on a moving irrigation apparatus). Yael does not disclose, a shade panel Allen teaches, a shade panel (see at least [0040] The shade may be provided by panels 230, preferably solar panels and/or shade panels laid out in an array supported by a solar array support structure 220, [0045] shade panels may be used in the place of solar panels, to provide the shade while still covering a large portion of the building roof and/or equipment, [0106] Moreover, the solar/shade structure 200 may further comprise one or more non-solar panels, or “shade panels” located in the array, and shade panel 1231 may be any device or apparatus configured to provide shade. Shade panel 1231 may be made of any suitable material, including for example, a textile, wood, metal, plastic, or any other suitable material capable of providing shade) Thus, Yael discloses a mobile platform with wheels and Allen teaches shade panels. As a result, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the inventions as disclosed by Yael with the shade panels taught by Allen, with a reasonable expectation of success, to provide the shade and reducing the size of the solar structure accordingly (0045). Yael does not disclose, a plurality of shade panels mounted on the top surface of the platform; wherein adjacent shade panels define gaps therebetween configured to permit a controlled amount of sunlight to pass through the platform wherein each of the plurality of shade panels is movably mounted to the platform and configured to slide along at least one of a plurality of channels to increase or decrease the gaps between the adjacent shade panels Fisher teaches, a plurality of shade panels mounted on the top surface of the platform; wherein adjacent shade panels define gaps therebetween configured to permit a controlled amount of sunlight to pass through the platform (see at least [0023] controlling shading by said rows of solar panels at said outdoor location to dynamically change a quantity of solar radiation over time to said photosynthetic crop, [0077] the at least one adjustable support is moved at least one of horizontally, vertically and at an angle to the horizontal relative to a static position of said photosynthetic crop, and [0095] said at least one solar energy apparatus further comprises at least one horizontally movable panel support). wherein each of the plurality of shade panels is movably mounted to the platform and configured to slide along at least one of a plurality of channels to increase or decrease the gaps between the adjacent shade panels (see at least [0131] An agri-voltaic system according to embodiment 31, wherein said at least one cable or said at least one rail enables said at least one row of solar panels to slide horizontally above said photosynthetic crop, and [0156] 39. An agri-voltaic system according to embodiment 1, wherein said at least one row of solar panels is configured for horizontal movement in a direction perpendicular to trees in said at least one rows of trees, wherein said at least one row of solar panels is further configured to cast its shade onto at least one passage between tree rows in order that the photosynthetic crops will be exposed to direct sun). Thus, Yael discloses a mobile platform with wheels and Fisher teaches agri-voltaic system that can be controlled to dynamically change a quantity of solar radiation over time to said photosynthetic crop. As a result, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the inventions as disclosed by Yael with the shade panels taught by Fisher, with a reasonable expectation of success, to control shading by said at least one solar panel at said outdoor location to dynamically change a quantity of solar radiation over time to said photosynthetic crop (0017). As per Claim 2, Yael discloses, mobile platform of claim 1, each said support tower further comprising: (a) one or more wheels; and (see at least Fig 1 and Fig. 1a 32 and [Page 3, 4th para] The system moves using a moving construction 32 as used in existing moving irrigation systems). a motor and transmission operably coupled to at least one wheel (see at least Fig. 1, Fig. 2, [Page 10, 1st partial para] the irrigation system movement is electrically powered, while in other embodiments, it is internal combustion motorized or otherwise powered (water pressure, wind, etc.)). As per Claim 4, Yael discloses, mobile platform of claim 2, each said support tower further comprising: at least one battery configured as a power source for the motor; and a motor controller (see at least [Page 10, 3rd Para] the 'system's movement is powered by the self-producing power. In other embodiments, the power is stored in batteries that could be placed on board). As per Claim 6, Yael discloses, mobile platform of claim 6, wherein said shade panels comprise an array of solar panels (see at least [Page 6, 3rd para] The system has a plurality of solar panels installed above the irrigation distributors, and [Page 6, 2nd para] photovoltaic panels of the moving system could be placed in a manner that shades the area that was just irrigated). Fisher also teaches, mobile platform of claim 6, wherein said shade panels comprise an array of solar panels (see at least [0023] controlling shading by said rows of solar panels at said outdoor location to dynamically change a quantity of solar radiation over time to said photosynthetic crop, and [0156] at least one row of solar panels is configured for horizontal movement in a direction perpendicular to trees in said at least one rows of trees, wherein said at least one row of solar panels is further configured to cast its shade onto at least one passage between tree rows in order that the photosynthetic crops will be exposed to direct sun). As per Claim 7, Yael discloses, mobile platform of claim 6, further comprising: a solar or shade panel support structure configured to allow each solar or shade panel to move around an axis and be dynamically oriented for optimum solar collection or shade (see at least [Page 8, 2nd para] if the system is designed to perform a 180° movement from dawn to dusk, the panels could be in a position that will always face the sun while the irrigation machine itself serves as tracker, [Page 8, 5th para] the tracking system comprises single or dual-axis mechanism that allows the 'panels' adjustment in a manner that optimizes the power production and the overall shading effect, and [Page 8, 6th para] Such a solar tracking system is well known in the art of photovoltaics and could be fitted according to the specifications of the geographic area and the nature of the irrigation apparatus (central pivot, linear moving, or other)). Fisher also teaches, mobile platform of claim 6, further comprising: a solar or shade panel support structure configured to allow each solar or shade panel to move around an axis and be dynamically oriented for optimum solar collection or shade (see at least [0017] dynamic control of movement of said at least one solar panel to control shading by said at least one solar panel at said outdoor location to dynamically change a quantity of solar radiation over time to said photosynthetic crop, [0077] the at least one adjustable support is moved at least one of horizontally, vertically and at an angle to the horizontal relative to a static position of said photosynthetic crop, and [0131] An agri-voltaic system according to embodiment 31, wherein said at least one cable or said at least one rail enables said at least one row of solar panels to slide horizontally above said photosynthetic crop) As per Claim 8, Yael discloses, mobile platform of claim 6, further comprising: a solar or shade panel support structure configured to allow rows of solar or shade panels to move around an axis and be dynamically oriented for optimum solar collection or shade (see at least [Page 9, 1st full paragraph] In some embodiments of the present invention, the plurality of solar panels is distributed in two, three, or more rows. In a manner allowing for increased energy production. This allows for better panels' adjustments and more accurate shading and angle distribution, and [Page 9, 2nd full paragraph] In some of these embodiments, the rows can be folded to open, closed, or differentiate angle positions. This allows for a larger solar usage area when open while saving space when not used or being transported). Fisher also teaches, mobile platform of claim 6, further comprising: a solar or shade panel support structure configured to allow rows of solar or shade panels to move around an axis and be dynamically oriented for optimum solar collection or shade (see at least [0156] at least one row of solar panels is configured for horizontal movement in a direction perpendicular to trees in said at least one rows of trees, wherein said at least one row of solar panels is further configured to cast its shade onto at least one passage between tree rows in order that the photosynthetic crops will be exposed to direct sun. Claims 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yael, Fisher and Allen as per Claim 1 in view of Steve R. Tippery et. al. US 20170251589 A1 (“Tippery”). As per Claim 3, Yael does not disclose, mobile platform of claim 1, each said support tower further comprising: (a) a continuous track; and (b) a motor and transmission operably coupled to the continuous track. Tippery teaches, mobile platform of claim 1, each said support tower further comprising: (a) a continuous track; and (b) a motor and transmission operably coupled to the continuous track (see at least Fig. 1I, Fig. 4A, [0003] Self-propelled irrigation systems, including center-pivot and lateral-move systems, have irrigation towers wheels are driven by drive motors mechanically coupled to gearboxes and/or drivelines, [0143] Embodiments of the present disclosure are also directed to one or more wheel- or track-driven propulsion units, and [0236] In one embodiment, as illustrated in FIGS. 4A and 4B, the propulsion unit 112 includes one or more drive wheels 402. In another embodiment, the propulsion unit 112 includes one or more idler wheels 404. In another embodiment, the propulsion unit 112 includes one or more tracks 406. For example, the tracks 406 may be constructed from rubber. For instance, the tracks 406 may be constructed from vulcanized rubber. By way of another embodiment, the tracks 406 may be constructed from steel. In another embodiment, where the propulsion unit 112 is configured to utilize a positive track belt system, the tracks 406 include one or more protrusions 406a). Thus, Yael discloses a mobile platform with wheels and Tippery teaches a platform with tracks. As a result, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the inventions as disclosed by Yael with the crawler/track wheels taught by Tippery, with a reasonable expectation of success, to have an improved ability to climb hills due to better soil contact (0249). Claims 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yael, Fisher and Allen as per Claim 1 in view of Li Linlin CN 110710400 (“Linlin”). As per Claim 5, Yael does not disclose, mobile platform of claim 1, each said support tower further comprising: a telescoping column configured to increase or decrease in length and thereby increase or decrease the height of the platform. Linlin teaches, mobile platform of claim 1, each said support tower further comprising: a telescoping column configured to increase or decrease in length and thereby increase or decrease the height of the platform ( see at least [Disclosure of Invention] the hydraulic telescopic rods extend to drive the connection plates to move downwards, the moving wheels move downwards to contact the ground, the greenhouse body is jacked up, bottoms of two side walls of the greenhouse body are separated from the ground, and accordingly, the greenhouse body is conveniently moved through the moving wheels, and [Technical Effects and Advantage of Present Invention] the hydraulic telescopic rod extends to drive the connecting plate to move downwards, so that the moving wheel moves downwards to be in contact with the ground, and the greenhouse body is jacked up, so that the bottoms of two side walls of the greenhouse body are separated from the ground, and the greenhouse body is convenient to move through the moving wheel). Thus, Yael discloses a mobile platform with wheels and Linlin teaches a platform with telescopic rods to raise the structure while moving. As a result, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the inventions as disclosed by Yael with the telescopic column taught by Linlin, with a reasonable expectation of success, to make it convenient for the greenhouse body to move on wheels (Disclosure of Invention). Claims 9-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yael, Fisher and Allen as per Claim 1 and further in view of Timo Bongartz et. al. US20190259108A1 (“Bongartz”). As per Claim 9, Yael does not disclose, mobile platform of claim 1, further comprising: auxiliary growth lights mounted to the bottom surface of the platform to improve crop growth rate and quality Bongartz teaches, mobile platform of claim 1, further comprising: auxiliary growth lights mounted to the bottom surface of the platform to improve crop growth rate and quality ( see at least [0010] can manage the entire growth system, applying not only a customized illumination to the plants (light recipes), but even customized environmental conditions (growth recipes) and solutions for maintaining or restoring plant health, and [0116] Beyond mimicking the sunlight, it can be about tailoring the illumination to a specific type of plant, in terms of the intensity and spectral composition. Different illumination setups can stimulate or trigger a difference in growth or the creation of certain ingredients (for instance primary and secondary metabolites). Thus, Yael discloses a mobile platform with wheels and Bongartz teaches use of auxiliary lights mounted to the bottom surface of the platform. As a result, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the inventions as disclosed by Yael with the illumination system as taught by Bongartz, with a reasonable expectation of success, to customize and adapt the farm to the specific needs of the plants (0004). As per Claim 10, Yael does not disclose, mobile platform of claim 1, further comprising: a plurality of environmental sensors mounted to the platform to monitor environmental conditions beneath the platform Bongartz teaches, mobile platform of claim 1, further comprising: a plurality of environmental sensors mounted to the platform to monitor environmental conditions beneath the platform (see at least [0351] The sensors being “of the same type” are adapted for measuring the same physical quantity. In some embodiments/implementations, these sensors are identical in construction. A physical quantity measured can for instance be the temperature, humidity, leaf temperature, VPD (vapor pressure deficit), substrate moisture, substrate temperature, or EC (electrical conductivity), further, the pH-value, wind/air velocity, or PAR (photosynthetically active radiating) can be measured. It is also possible to measure vibrations, or sound, but also camera imaging solutions (including hyperspectral imaging) can be implemented, and [0352] The “plurality” of sensors can for instance be at least 5, 10, 20, 30 or 40 sensors (with possible upper limits of for instance not more than 1000, 500 or 100). Thus, Yael discloses a mobile platform with wheels and Bongartz teaches use of environmental sensor mounted on the platform. As a result, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the inventions as disclosed by Yael with the environment sensor system as taught by Bongartz, with a reasonable expectation of success, to customize and adapt the farm to the specific needs of the plants (0004). As per Claim 11, Yael does not disclose, mobile platform of claim 1, further comprising: one or more auxiliary fans mounted to the bottom surface of the platform to create movement of air beneath the platform. Bongartz teaches, mobile platform of claim 1, further comprising: one or more auxiliary fans mounted to the bottom surface of the platform to create movement of air beneath the platform (see at least [0136] the LEDs nevertheless produce a significant amount of heat, which is usually taken away from the agricultural light fixture using heat spreaders, heat pipes or other solutions to cool the LEDs and prevent an overheating of the LEDs and the surrounding electronics. The thus removed heat-energy is usually lost for further usage, and [0715] The risk of infestation of the plants by fungi is usually reduced by reducing the population density, using a dry cultivation (i.e. irrigation from below and possibly in the morning or only a few larger water sprayings), introducing a time interval to a subsequent crop cycle, preventing dew formation in the greenhouse (emergency dry heating, use of fans), using hygienic measures, or supplying balanced nutrients (e.g. avoiding nitrogen stress). Thus, Yael discloses a mobile platform with wheels and Bongartz teaches use of one or more auxiliary fans to create movement of air beneath the platform. As a result, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the inventions as disclosed by Yael with the cooling system as taught by Bongartz, with a reasonable expectation of success, to customize and adapt the farm to the specific needs of the plants (0004). Claims 12-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yael, Fisher, Allen Bongartz. As per Claim 12, Yael discloses, mobile, scalable, self-powered agrivoltaic system (see at least [Page 6, 3rd Para] solar panels produce power that could be transferred, used immediately, (e.g., for the system's self-mobility and activity), or be stored in various ways). comprising: a support structure (see at least Fig. 1, Fig. 1a and [Page 3, 4th para] system moves using a moving construction 32 as used in existing moving irrigation systems). a plurality of motorized towers attached to the support structure and configured to move the support structure from location to location (see at least Fig. 1, Fig. 1a and [Page 3, 4th para] system moves using a moving construction 32 as used in existing moving irrigation systems, and [Page 7, 3rd Para] moving system comprises a plurality of photovoltaic solar panels and is mounted on a moving irrigation apparatus). a plurality of solar panels attached to the support structure, said solar panels configured to provide shade to crops, said solar panels configured to provide electrical power to the motorized towers (see at least [Page 6, 3rd para] The system has a plurality of solar panels installed above the irrigation distributors). an irrigation system attached to the support structure and configured to provide irrigation to crops (see at least [Page. 5, last para] a moving agrivoltaic solar panel system combined with a moving irrigation apparatus). Yael does not disclose, a shade panel Allen teaches, a shade panel (see at least [0040] The shade may be provided by panels 230, preferably solar panels and/or shade panels laid out in an array supported by a solar array support structure 220, [0045] shade panels may be used in the place of solar panels, to provide the shade while still covering a large portion of the building roof and/or equipment, [0106] Moreover, the solar/shade structure 200 may further comprise one or more non-solar panels, or “shade panels” located in the array, and shade panel 1231 may be any device or apparatus configured to provide shade. Shade panel 1231 may be made of any suitable material, including for example, a textile, wood, metal, plastic, or any other suitable material capable of providing shade) Thus, Yael discloses a mobile platform with wheels and Allen teaches shade panels. As a result, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the inventions as disclosed by Yael with the shade panels taught by Allen, with a reasonable expectation of success, to provide the shade and reducing the size of the solar structure accordingly (0045). Yael does not disclose, a plurality of shade panels attached to the support structure, said shade panels configured to provide limited sunlight to crops Fisher teaches, a plurality of shade panels attached to the support structure, said shade panels configured to provide limited sunlight to crops (see at least [0017] an agri-voltaic system for electricity and a photosynthetic crop production at an outdoor location, the system comprising … dynamic control of movement of said at least one solar panel to control shading by said at least one solar panel at said outdoor location to dynamically change a quantity of solar radiation over time to said photosynthetic crop, and [0315] to move the panels horizontally along a first set of rails/cables 1324, disposed in a horizontal direction to provide controlled shade for the crops/trees). Thus, Yael discloses a mobile platform with wheels and Fisher teaches agri-voltaic system that can be controlled to dynamically change a quantity of solar radiation over time to said photosynthetic crop. As a result, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the inventions as disclosed by Yael with the shade panels taught by Fisher, with a reasonable expectation of success, to control shading by said at least one solar panel at said outdoor location to dynamically change a quantity of solar radiation over time to said photosynthetic crop (0017). Yael does not disclose, a sensor system configured to monitor crop moisture and deploy the irrigation system when crop irrigation is required. Bongartz teaches, a sensor system configured to monitor crop moisture and deploy the irrigation system when crop irrigation is required (see at least [00475] the controlled agricultural system is equipped with sensors that are able to acquire the aforementioned abiotic and biotic environmental parameters at adjustable time intervals or else continuously, and [0638] the countermeasures may contain light recipes, which reduce the plant stress (biotic stress). For reducing biotic stress, illumination parameters may be adapted, for example, the illumination duration and/or the illuminance may be changed, e.g. reduced, and/or the light spectrum of the illumination may be changed). Thus, Yael discloses a mobile, self-powered agrivoltaic system and Bongartz teaches use of sensors and irrigation system in a controlled agricultural system. As a result, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the inventions as disclosed by Yael with the sensor and irrigation system as taught by Bongartz, with a reasonable expectation of success, to customize and adapt the farm to the specific needs of the plants (0004) and learn automatically the conditions for detection of the stressors or disease causing conditions (0108). As per Claim 13, Yael discloses, System of claim 12, further comprising: a solar panel support structure configured to allow each solar panel to move around an axis and be dynamically oriented for optimum solar collection. (see at least [Page 8, 2nd para] if the system is designed to perform a 180° movement from dawn to dusk, the panels could be in a position that will always face the sun while the irrigation machine itself serves as tracker, [Page 8, 5th para] the tracking system comprises single or dual-axis mechanism that allows the 'panels' adjustment in a manner that optimizes the power production and the overall shading effect, and [Page 8, 6th para] Such a solar tracking system is well known in the art of photovoltaics and could be fitted according to the specifications of the geographic area and the nature of the irrigation apparatus (central pivot, linear moving, or other). As per Claim 14, Yael discloses, system of claim 12, further comprising: a solar panel support structure configured to allow rows of solar panels to move around an axis and be dynamically oriented for optimum solar collection (see at least [Page 9, 1st full paragraph] In some embodiments of the present invention, the plurality of solar panels is distributed in two, three, or more rows. In a manner allowing for increased energy production. This allows for better panels' adjustments and more accurate shading and angle distribution, and [Page 9, 2nd full paragraph] In some of these embodiments, the rows can be folded to open, closed, or differentiate angle positions. This allows for a larger solar usage area when open while saving space when not used or being transported). As per Claim 15, Yael discloses, system of claim 12, further comprising: a battery storage system connected to the solar panels and configured to store power for operating the motorized towers and for providing power to auxiliary equipment (see at least [Page 6, 3rd Para] solar panels produce power that could be transferred, used immediately, (e.g., for the system's self-mobility and activity), or be stored in various ways). As per Claim 16, Yael does not disclose, system of claim 15, further comprising: a plurality of light bars attached to the support structure beneath the solar panels and configured to provide light of wavelengths that will promote plant growth at nighttime. Bongartz teaches, system of claim 15, further comprising: a plurality of light bars attached to the support structure beneath the solar panels (see at least [0128] Traditional luminaires or lighting fixtures are arranged above a target region, which is to be illuminated. Thus, plants grown in or on such target regions commonly will only be illuminated from the top, mainly with vertical light incidence). and configured to provide light of wavelengths that will promote plant growth at nighttime (see at least [0010] can manage the entire growth system, applying not only a customized illumination to the plants (light recipes), but even customized environmental conditions (growth recipes) and solutions for maintaining or restoring plant health, [0039] It would also be beneficial to track plant growth data or growth indicators continuously, by day and night, and correlate the data to other external parameters like temperature, nutrients, photon flux, applied spectra, etc., [0116] Beyond mimicking the sunlight, it can be about tailoring the illumination to a specific type of plant, in terms of the intensity and spectral composition. Different illumination setups can stimulate or trigger a difference in growth or the creation of certain ingredients (for instance primary and secondary metabolites, and [0684] controlled agricultural system with a light fixture is proposed that is configured to be able to illuminate plants during the nighttime). Thus, Yael discloses a mobile, self-powered agrivoltaic system and Bongartz teaches a lighting system that provides lights at different wavelengths for plant growth. As a result, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the inventions as disclosed by Yael with the sensor and irrigation system as taught by Bongartz, with a reasonable expectation of success, to customize and adapt the farm to the specific needs of the plants (0004) and learn automatically the conditions for detection of the stressors or disease causing conditions (0108). As per Claim 17, Yael does not disclose, system of claim 12, further comprising: sensors attached to the support structure and configured to monitor plant growth rates and detect plant biotic and abiotic stresses. Bongartz teaches, system of claim 12, further comprising: sensors attached to the support structure and configured to monitor plant growth rates and detect plant biotic and abiotic stresses (see at least [00475] the controlled agricultural system is equipped with sensors that are able to acquire the aforementioned abiotic and biotic environmental parameters at adjustable time intervals or else continuously, and [0638] the countermeasures may contain light recipes, which reduce the plant stress (biotic stress). For reducing biotic stress, illumination parameters may be adapted, for example, the illumination duration and/or the illuminance may be changed, e.g. reduced, and/or the light spectrum of the illumination may be changed). Thus, Yael discloses a mobile, self-powered agrivoltaic system and Bongartz teaches sensors monitoring plant growth and biotic and abiotic stresses. As a result, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the inventions as disclosed by Yael with the sensor taught by Bongartz, with a reasonable expectation of success, to customize and adapt the farm learn automatically the conditions for detection of the stressors or disease causing conditions (0108). As per Claim 18, Yael does not disclose, system of claim 12, further comprising one or more sensors attached to the support structure selected from the group of sensors consisting of electrical sensors, motion sensors, proximity sensors, GPS sensors, environmental condition sensors, thermal sensors, irrigation load sensors and LED load sensors. Bongartz teaches, system of claim 12, further comprising one or more sensors attached to the support structure selected from the group of sensors consisting of electrical sensors, motion sensors, proximity sensors, GPS sensors, environmental condition sensors, thermal sensors, irrigation load sensors and LED load sensors (see at least Fig. 37, [0351] The sensors being “of the same type” are adapted for measuring the same physical quantity. In some embodiments/implementations, these sensors are identical in construction. A physical quantity measured can for instance be the temperature, humidity, leaf temperature, VPD (vapor pressure deficit), substrate moisture, substrate temperature, or EC (electrical conductivity), further, the pH-value, wind/air velocity, or PAR (photosynthetically active radiating) can be measured. It is also possible to measure vibrations, or sound, but also camera imaging solutions (including hyperspectral imaging) can be implemented, and [0352] The “plurality” of sensors can for instance be at least 5, 10, 20, 30 or 40 sensors (with possible upper limits of for instance not more than 1000, 500 or 100), and [0534] the sensor device comprises one or more of the following sensors or a combination thereof: imaging system, e.g. still or video camera, in some embodiments/implementations TOF camera or stereo camera, LIDAR system, environmental sensor, e.g. for measuring temperature, humidity and/or chemical composition of the air or soil, sensors for detecting color changes of the plant, particularly of the leaves, sensors for detecting specific gases exhaled by the plants, sensors for detecting the fluorescence emitted by the plants after activation with dedicated radiation). Thus, Yael discloses a mobile, self-powered agrivoltaic system and Bongartz teaches a various sensors attached to the system. As a result, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the inventions as disclosed by Yael with the sensor taught by Bongartz, with a reasonable expectation of success, to customize and adapt the farm to the specific needs of the plants (0004) and learn automatically the conditions for detection of the stressors or disease causing conditions (0108). As per Claim 19, Yael does not disclose, system of claim 12, further comprising: a main control unit (MCU) with a processor and non-transitory memory storing instructions executable by the processor for controlling a mechanical subsystem, an electrical subsystem and a sensor subsystem. Bongartz teaches, system of claim 12, further comprising: a main control unit (MCU) with a processor and non-transitory memory storing instructions executable by the processor for controlling a mechanical subsystem, an electrical subsystem and a sensor subsystem (see at least Fig. 17, 29, [0202] a computing device, [0201] an actuator device, [0203] wherein the actuator device is configured for adjusting a distance between the growth locations and hence a size of the growth area, and [2769] the embodiments may be implemented using hardware, software or a combination thereof. When implemented in software, the software code can be executed on any suitable processor or collection of processors, whether provided in a single computer or distributed among multiple computers). Thus, Yael discloses a mobile, self-powered agrivoltaic system and Bongartz teaches the system comprises a control unit with processor for controlling various sub-systems. As a result, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the inventions as disclosed by Yael with the implementation using hardware, software or a combination as taught by Bongartz, with a reasonable expectation of success, to customize and adapt the farm to the specific needs of the plants (0004) and to enable optimization of the energy footprint (0022). As per Claim 20, Yael discloses, a support structure with a plurality of solar panels and a plurality of shade panels attached to the support structure, said solar panels and said shade panels configured to provide shade to crops, said solar panels configured to produce electrical power (see at least Fig. 1, Fig. 1a and Fig. 3, [Page 6, 3rd para] The system has a plurality of solar panels installed above the irrigation distributors, and [Page 6, 2nd para] photovoltaic panels of the moving system could be placed in a manner that shades the area that was just irrigated) a plurality of mobile support columns attached to the support structure, said mobile support columns having a motor, transmission, battery power source and wheels configured to move the support structure from location to location (see at least Fig. 1, Fig. 1a, [Page 3, 4th para] system moves using a moving construction 32 as used in existing moving irrigation systems, and [Page 7, 3rd Para] moving system comprises a plurality of photovoltaic solar panels and is mounted on a moving irrigation apparatus). Yael does not disclose, a plurality of shade panel Allen teaches, a plurality of shade panel (see at least [0040] The shade may be provided by panels 230, preferably solar panels and/or shade panels laid out in an array supported by a solar array support structure 220, [0045] shade panels may be used in the place of solar panels, to provide the shade while still covering a large portion of the building roof and/or equipment, [0106] Moreover, the solar/shade structure 200 may further comprise one or more non-solar panels, or “shade panels” located in the array, and shade panel 1231 may be any device or apparatus configured to provide shade. Shade panel 1231 may be made of any suitable material, including for example, a textile, wood, metal, plastic, or any other suitable material capable of providing shade) Thus, Yael discloses a mobile platform with wheels and Allen teaches shade panels. As a result, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the inventions as disclosed by Yael with the shade panels taught by Allen, with a reasonable expectation of success, to provide the shade and reducing the size of the solar structure accordingly (0045). Yael does not disclose, wherein adjacent shade panels define gaps therebetween configured to provide a controlled amount of shade to crops, and wherein each of the plurality of shade panels is movably mounted to the support structure and configured to slide along at least one of a plurality of channels to increase or decrease the gaps between the adjacent shade panels Fisher teaches, adjacent shade panels define gaps therebetween configured to provide a controlled amount of shade to crops (see at least [0023] controlling shading by said rows of solar panels at said outdoor location to dynamically change a quantity of solar radiation over time to said photosynthetic crop, [0077] the at least one adjustable support is moved at least one of horizontally, vertically and at an angle to the horizontal relative to a static position of said photosynthetic crop, and [0095] said at least one solar energy apparatus further comprises at least one horizontally movable panel support). each of the plurality of shade panels is movably mounted to the support structure and configured to slide along at least one of a plurality of channels to increase or decrease the gaps between the adjacent shade panels (see at least [0131] An agri-voltaic system according to embodiment 31, wherein said at least one cable or said at least one rail enables said at least one row of solar panels to slide horizontally above said photosynthetic crop, and [0156] 39. An agri-voltaic system according to embodiment 1, wherein said at least one row of solar panels is configured for horizontal movement in a direction perpendicular to trees in said at least one rows of trees, wherein said at least one row of solar panels is further configured to cast its shade onto at least one passage between tree rows in order that the photosynthetic crops will be exposed to direct sun). Thus, Yael discloses a mobile platform with wheels and Fisher teaches agri-voltaic system that can be controlled to dynamically change a quantity of solar radiation over time to said photosynthetic crop. As a result, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the inventions as disclosed by Yael with the shade panels taught by Fisher, with a reasonable expectation of success, to control shading by said at least one solar panel at said outdoor location to dynamically change a quantity of solar radiation over time to said photosynthetic crop (0017). Yael does not disclose, an irrigation system attached to the support structure and configured to provide irrigation to crops a sensor system configured to monitor crop moisture and deploy the irrigation system when crop irrigation is required; and a control system configured to control the solar panel electricity production, the motor, the irrigation system and the sensor system. Bongartz teaches, an irrigation system attached to the support structure and configured to provide irrigation to crops (see at least [2447] The irrigation device 3700 is mounted movable at a ceiling 3705, it hangs at a rod 3706 hanging from the ceiling 3705. Via a rail system (see FIG. 37), the irrigation device 3700 is movable forth and back over the growth area 3704, namely forward out of the drawing plane and backward behind the drawing plane. Such an irrigation device 3700 is known as such. A power supply or data cable line 3710 connects the sensors 3702 with the control box 3711 of the irrigation device 3700. In particular, the irrigation device 3700 and the sensor device 3702 can share a common power supply 3712). a sensor system configured to monitor crop moisture (see at least [0533] By using data of other sensors (environmental sensors, chemical sensors), the different morphological changes can be linked to other causes (e.g. hanging leafs due to not enough water or due to other environmental parameters such as a too high salt concentration). deploy the irrigation system when crop irrigation is required (see at least [0531] If the morphological change is due to a certain root cause (e.g. not enough water), the system may optionally initiate a counter-measure (e.g. irrigation). For this purpose, the controlled agricultural system further comprises respective actuators (e.g. irrigation system) a control system configured to control the solar panel electricity production, the motor, the irrigation system and the sensor system (see at least [0532] computing device is configured to automatically counteract by means of the actuator device, if stress, diseases, pests or any other critical condition is identified). Thus, Yael discloses a mobile agrivoltaic system and Bongartz teaches the control system for an irrigation and sensor system that comprises a control unit with processor for controlling various sub-systems. As a result, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the inventions as disclosed by Yael with the control system as taught by Bongartz, with a reasonable expectation of success, to customize and adapt the farm to the specific needs of the plants (0004) and to enable optimization of the energy footprint (0022). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ASHUTOSH PANDE whose telephone number is (571)272-6269. The examiner can normally be reached Monday -Friday 9:00am -5:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Fadey Jabr can be reached at 5712721516. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A.P./Examiner, Art Unit 3668 /Fadey S. Jabr/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3668
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 05, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 20, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 13, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12564136
MOWER, MOWING SYSTEM, AND DRIVE CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12567328
CONTEXT-BASED IDENTIFICATION OF VEHICLE CONNECTIVITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 2 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+8.3%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 7 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month