Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/765,370

ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 08, 2024
Priority
May 14, 2019 — continuation of 11/217,557 +1 more
Examiner
PATERSON, BRIGITTE A
Art Unit
2896
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Innolux Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
300 granted / 391 resolved
+8.7% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
416
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
46.7%
+6.7% vs TC avg
§102
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
§112
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 391 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 5-8 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 7/13/2026. The election filed 7/13/2026 elects the species of the bond pad connection portion as depicted in Fig. 6 and the system top view as depicted in Fig. 16. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2012/0044432 A1 (Yeh). Re claim 1, Yeh teaches an electronic device (display 10), comprising: a substrate (substrate 100), comprising a peripheral region (non-display region); a first pad (first pad 110/contact layers 142) disposed on the peripheral region of the substrate, wherein the first pad has a first conductive layer (first pad 110) and a second conductive layer (contact layers 142) disposed on the first conductive layer; and a first insulating layer (second insulating layer 130) disposed on the first conductive layer, the first insulating layer having a plurality of openings arranged along a first direction (Y direction) and exposing a portion of the first conductive layer of the first pad (Figs. 5-6), wherein the second conductive layer of the first pad is disposed on at least a portion of the first insulating layer and electrically connected to the first conductive layer of the first pad through the plurality of openings (Fig. 6), wherein in a top view of the electronic device, in a second direction (X direction) perpendicular to the first direction, a width of the second conductive layer of the first pad is greater than a width of the first conductive layer of the first pad (Fig. 6). PNG media_image1.png 640 472 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 414 588 media_image2.png Greyscale Re claim 2, Yeh teaches wherein the first conductive layer includes a metal layer ([0028]). Re claim 3, Yeh teaches wherein the first conductive layer includes multiple layers ([0028]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2012/0044432 A1 (Yeh) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of US 2019/0229446 A1 (Kim). Re claim 4, Yeh teaches the electronic device as claimed in claim 1, Yeh is silent with regards to the materials used for the second conductive layer. However, Yeh teaches a display device wherein there are contact pads sandwiching nanoparticles in the bond layer. Kim teaches a display device having contact pads wherein the conductive layer of the contact pads in contact with the conductive particles includes an oxygen-containing conductive layer or an oxide layer ([0071]). It would have been obvious to the ordinary skilled artisan at the time of filing to add the invention of Kim including forming the conductive layer in contact with the particles being an oxide conductive material. The motivation to do so is that Yeh is completely silent with regards to the appropriate materials for the conductive layer in contact with the conductive particles therefore the ordinary skilled artisan would look to Kim to find an appropriate material for this same purpose. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIGITTE A PATERSON whose telephone number is (571)272-1752. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Kraig can be reached at 571-272-8660. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BRIGITTE A. PATERSON Primary Examiner Art Unit 2896 /BRIGITTE A PATERSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2896
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 08, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 10, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749609
Large Dzyaloshinskii – Moriya Interaction and Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy Induced by Chemisorbed Species on Ferromagnets
4y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740176
IMAGE SENSOR INCLUDING STACKED CHIPS
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12737660
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR OPERATING A QUANTUM NETWORK NODE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733352
DISPLAY APPARATUS HAVING MULTI-PAD PIXEL ELECTRODES
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12733406
METHOD OF FORMING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.4%)
2y 8m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 391 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month