Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/765,812

AIRCRAFT ENGINE INLET MONITORING USING NEUROMORPHIC SENSORS

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jul 08, 2024
Priority
Jul 07, 2023 — provisional 63/512,465
Examiner
NIMOX, RAYMOND LONDALE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
RTX Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
344 granted / 487 resolved
+10.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
526
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
37.6%
-2.4% vs TC avg
§103
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
§102
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§112
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 487 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim(s) 8-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because the claim(s) are directed towards “A computer-readable medium…”. The claim(s) should be amended to read ‘A non-transitory computer readable media having instructions stored thereon that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: …’. Allowable Subject Matter (over prior art) Claim(s) 1-7, 15-20 is/are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter over prior art: Examiner’s closest prior art to the claimed subject matter: SHI ET AL. (US 20230050794 A1) teaches ‘a cone-rod dual-modality neuromorphic vision sensor, including: a first preset quantity of voltage-mode active pixel sensor (APS) circuits and a second preset quantity of current-mode APS circuits, where each of the voltage-mode APS circuits includes a first-type photosensitive device, and each of the current-mode APS circuits includes a second-type photosensitive device. The voltage-mode APS can output a target voltage signal representing light intensity information in a target light signal. The obtained target voltage signal represents the light intensity information with a higher precision, and therefore an image with higher quality can be obtained, that is, the image has a higher signal-noise ratio. The voltage-mode APS can output a specified digital signal representing light intensity gradient information in the target light signal, to ensure performance indicators such as an image dynamic range and a shooting speed of the neuromorphic vision sensor, thereby making the neuromorphic vision sensor more stable and robust’; NICHOLAS ET AL. (US 20220291139 A1) teaches ‘foreign object debris monitoring in an environment with a dynamic debris field, such as an environment for operating an aircraft. The debris monitoring technique includes generating a light beam and dispersing it to create a virtual witness plate, which is a two-dimensional sheet of light that covers a detection area. The technique also include detecting scattered light from the virtual witness plate caused by debris passing through it. A debris event may be generated based on the scattered light, indicating the presence of debris in the detection area’. None of the cited prior art alone or in combination provides motivation to explicitly teach: receive first data from the neuromorphic sensor, the first data including a visual data characteristic associated with an image of an inlet of the aircraft engine; receive second data from the neuromorphic sensor subsequent to receiving the first data, wherein the second data indicates a change in the visual data characteristic; identify, based on the change in the visual data characteristic, an event associated with debris in the inlet of the aircraft engine; and in response to identifying the event associated with debris in the aircraft engine, activate at least one other neuromorphic sensor coupled to the aircraft engine and in communication with the FADEC system of claim(s) 1, 8, 15 (including dependent claim(s)). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAYMOND NIMOX whose telephone number is (469)295-9226. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thu 10am-8pm CT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ANDREW SCHECHTER can be reached at (571) 272-2302. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. RAYMOND NIMOX Primary Examiner Art Unit 2857 /RAYMOND L NIMOX/Primary Examiner, Art Unit
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 08, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748159
BATTERY PROCESSING SYSTEM AND BATTERY PROCESSING METHOD
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742900
ROBUST LOW FREQUENCY SEISMIC BANDWIDTH EXTENSION VIA A DEEP NEURAL NETWORK TRAINED ON SYNTHETIC SEISMIC DATA
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12742768
IN SITU CONCENTRATION OF HYDROCARBONS IN ROCK
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12717055
BANDWIDTH EXTENSION VIA DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS TRAINED ON SYNTHETIC SEISMIC DATASETS
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12705530
OFF-DUTY-CYCLE-ROBUST MACHINE LEARNING FOR ANOMALY DETECTION IN ASSETS WITH RANDOM DOWN TIMES
5y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+10.0%)
3y 1m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 487 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month