Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/767,994

AIMING EQUIPMENT AND SPECTROSCOPE MODULE THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 10, 2024
Examiner
AYUB, HINA F
Art Unit
2877
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Taizhou Guanyu Technology Co., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
582 granted / 687 resolved
+16.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
711
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
51.7%
+11.7% vs TC avg
§102
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§112
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 687 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-7 and 12-15 in the reply filed on 12 January 2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Crispin (US 10,240,898, disclosed in IDS 06 February 2025), hereinafter Crispin. Claim 1: Crispin discloses an aiming equipment (100, Fig. 3), comprising: a light source module (108/116), configured to project a first light (110) and a second light (118), wherein the first light and the second light have different wavelengths (Col. 4, Lines 64-66); and a spectroscope module (see annotated figure below), comprising at least two lenses (104/112) to reflect the first light (110) and the second light (118) (Col. 4, Lines 1-11) and reduce a color difference between the first light (110) and the second light (118) (by reducing/eliminating parallax: Col. 1, Lines 36-41). PNG media_image1.png 629 877 media_image1.png Greyscale annotated Fig. 3 of Crispin to show the spectroscopic module and the optical axis of the light source module Claim 7: Crispin further discloses wherein the light source module (108/116) is disposed on a main optical axis of the spectroscope module (evident from annotated figure above). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 12-15 and 19-20 are allowed. The following is an Examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claims 12-15,19-20: None of the prior art of record, alone or in combination, teaches or discloses a spectroscope module for an aiming equipment, comprising: a second lens; wherein the second lens is disposed between the first lens and the third lens, the third lens faces a light source module of the aiming equipment, the second lens has a reflecting film on a surface adjacent to the first lens, and the reflecting film is used to reflect a first light and a second light projected by the light source module, in combination with the rest of the limitations of independent claim 12. Any comments considered necessary by Applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Claims 2-6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claims 2-6: None of the prior art of record, alone or in combination, teaches or discloses the aiming equipment according to claim 1, wherein the at least two lenses comprise a first lens, a second lens and a third lens, the second lens is disposed between the first lens and the third lens, the third lens faces the light source module, the second lens has a reflecting film on a surface adjacent to the first lens, and the reflecting film is used to reflect the first light and the second light. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to Applicant's disclosure. Zhao et al. (CN 105132534) disclose a spectroscope module for an aiming equipment (Figs. 8-9) (citations refer to the attached English translation), comprising: a first lens (41) (Page 6, Line 53); a second lens (40) (Page 6, Line 53); and a third lens (39) (Page 6, Line 53); wherein the second lens (40) is disposed between the first lens (41) and the third lens (39) (evident from Figs. 8-9), and the third lens (39) faces a light source module of the aiming equipment (Col. 6, Line 57 - Col. 7, Line 3). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the Examiner should be directed to HINA F AYUB whose telephone number is (571)270-3171. The Examiner can normally be reached on 9am-5pm ET Mon-Fri. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the Examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the Examiner’s supervisor, Tarifur Chowdhury can be reached on 571-272-2287. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Hina F Ayub/ Primary Patent Examiner Art Unit 2877
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 07, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596072
FLUORIMETER CELL AND ITS CALIBRATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593659
SPECTROSCOPIC DEVICE, SPECTROSCOPIC METHOD USING THE SAME, AND METHOD OF FABRICATING SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590887
SPECTRUM MEASUREMENT APPARATUS AND SPECTRUM MEASUREMENT METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12566272
3D SCANNING SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12566122
GAS DETECTING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+7.5%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 687 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month