Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/768,925

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 10, 2024
Priority
Jan 11, 2022 — JP 2022-002413 +1 more
Examiner
KEAGY, ROSE ALYSSA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Rohm Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allowance Rate
41 granted / 44 resolved
+33.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
58
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
63.1%
+23.1% vs TC avg
§102
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
§112
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 44 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed 5/20/2026 fails to comply with 37 CFR 1.98(a)(2), which requires a legible copy of each non-patent literature publication or that portion which caused it to be listed; and all other information or that portion which caused it to be listed. It has been placed in the application file, but the information referred to therein has not been considered. The Office Action issued in corresponding German application with a May 8, 2026 date was not included. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 and 12-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Matsubara et al. (“Matsubara”), US 2016/0307854 (listed in the IDS dated 5-20-2026. Regarding Claim 1, Matsubara discloses a semiconductor device (A1; Fig. 2; ¶ 0034 “semiconductor device A1”) comprising: an insulating element (12; Fig. 2; ¶ 0034 “an insulating element 12”); a conductive member (2, 3, 4, 5; Fig. 2; ¶ 0038 “conductive support includes the die pads 2, a plurality of first terminals 3, a plurality of second terminals 4, and a plurality of support terminals 5”) including a first terminal (3, 31, 32; Fig. 2; ¶ 0043 “first terminals 3 include a plurality of first inner terminals 31 and a pair of first outer terminals 32”; ¶ ) and a second terminal (4, 41, 42; Fig. 2; ¶ 0048 “plurality of second terminals 4 include a plurality of second inner terminals 41 and a pair of second outer terminals 42”) that are electrically connected to the insulating element (Fig. 2; ¶ 0077 “first bonding wire 711 electrically connects the control element 111 to at least one of the first terminals 3”; ¶ 0078 “second bonding wires 712 electrically connect the insulating element 12 and the control element 111” therefore the first terminal 3 is electrically connected to the insulating element 12; ¶ 0079 “each third bonding wire 713 is bonded to one of the pads 12a of the insulating element 12 at one end and to one of the pads 112a of the drive element 112 at the other end”; ¶ 0080 “fourth bonding wires 714 provide a conduction path connecting the drive element 112 to the second terminals 4” therefore the second terminal 4 is electrically connected to the insulating element 12); a sealing resin (6; Figs. 1-3; ¶ 0066 “sealing resin 6”) including a resin first surface (63; Figs. 2-3, 7; ¶ 0068 “pair of first side surfaces 63 of the sealing resin 6”) from which the first terminal protrudes (Figs. 2-3, 7; ¶ 0068 “first terminals 3…are exposed from one of the pair of first side surfaces 63”), and a resin second surface (63; Figs. 2, 4, 7; ¶ 0068 “pair of first side surfaces 63 of the sealing resin 6”) that faces away from the resin first surface (Figs. 2-4, 7; ¶ 0068 “pair of first side surfaces 63 of the sealing resin 6 are spaced apart in the second direction Y and face away from each other”; ¶ 0089 “the first terminals 3 and the second terminals 4 are exposed from a different one of the pair of first side surfaces 63 of the sealing resin 6”) in a first direction (Y; Fig. 2; ¶ 0068 “pair of first side surfaces 63 of the sealing resin 6 are spaced apart in the second direction Y and face away from each other”) perpendicular to a thickness direction (Fig. 7; ¶ 0019 “FIG. 7 is a sectional view along line VII-VII of FIG. 2”; ¶ 0037 “insulating element 12 (also shown in FIG. 7)” therefore a resin second surface 63 is perpendicular to a thickness direction of the insulating element 12) of the insulating element (12; Fig. 7) and from which the second terminal protrudes (Figs. 2, 4, 7; ¶ 0048 “second terminals 4 extend in the second direction Y beyond the other one of the two first side surfaces 63 of the sealing resin 6” and “plurality of second terminals 4 include a plurality of second inner terminals 41 and a pair of second outer terminals 42”; ¶ 0056 “extend in the second direction Y beyond the same first side surface 63 as the second terminals 4, to be partially exposed from the sealing resin 6”); and a discharge path (Fig. 2; ¶ 0076 “bonding wires 71 connect the first terminals 3, the second terminals 4…to together provide a conduction path within the semiconductor device A1” and “bonding wires 71 include a plurality of first bonding wires 711, a plurality of second bonding wires 712, a plurality of third bonding wires 713, and a plurality of fourth bonding wires 714”; ¶ 0077 “first bonding wire 711 electrically connects the control element 111 to at least one of the first terminals 3”; ¶ 0078 “second bonding wires 712 electrically connect the insulating element 12 and the control element 111”; ¶ 0079 “each third bonding wire 713 is bonded to one of the pads 12a of the insulating element 12 at one end and to one of the pads 112a of the drive element 112 at the other end”; ¶ 0080 “fourth bonding wires 714 provide a conduction path connecting the drive element 112 to the second terminals 4” therefore a discharge path that is a conductive path between the first terminal 3 and the second terminal 4) that is a conductive path (¶ 0076 “provide a conduction path”) between (Fig. 2; ¶ 0076 “bonding wires 71 connect the first terminals 3, the second terminals 4…to together provide a conduction path within the semiconductor device A1”) the first terminal (3, 31, 32) and the second terminal (4, 41, 42). Matsubara does not specifically disclose a discharge path that is electrically conductive at a voltage lower than a dielectric withstand voltage of the insulating element. It would be obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Matsubara to choose a dielectric with a higher breakdown voltage that will be seen across the discharge path, so the semiconductor device will last longer (have improved reliability). Regarding Claim 12, Matsubara discloses further comprising: a control element (111; Fig. 2; ¶ 0035 “control element 111”) electrically connected to the insulating element (Fig. 2; ¶ 0078 “second bonding wires 712 electrically connect the insulating element 12 and the control element 111”); and a drive element (112; Fig. 2; ¶ 0035 “drive element 112”) electrically connected to the insulating element (Fig. 2; ¶ 0079 “each third bonding wire 713 is bonded to one of the pads 12a of the insulating element 12 at one end and to one of the pads 112a of the drive element 112 at the other end”). Regarding Claim 13, Matsubara discloses wherein the conductive member (2) includes: a first die pad (21; Fig. 2; ¶ 0039 “die pads 2 includes the first die pad 21 and the second die pad 22”) on which the control element is mounted (Fig. 2; ¶ 0037 “control element 111…mounted on a first die pad 21, which is one of die pads 2”); and a second die pad (22; Fig. 2; ¶ 0039 “die pads 2 includes the first die pad 21 and the second die pad 22”) spaced apart from the first die pad (Fig. 2; ¶ 0039 “shown in FIG. 2, the first die pad 21 is spaced apart from the second die pad 22 in the second direction Y”) and on which the drive element is mounted (Fig. 2; ¶ 0037 “drive element 112 is mounted on a second die pad 22, which is another one of the die pads 2”). Regarding Claim 14, Matsubara discloses wherein the insulating element is mounted on the first die pad (Fig. 2; ¶ 0037 “insulating element 12 are mounted on a first die pad 21, which is one of die pads 2”). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-11 and 15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding Claim 2, the prior art does not teach or render obvious further comprising a discharge portion exposed from the sealing resin and insulated from the conductive member, wherein the discharge path includes the discharge portion and a path formed by creeping discharge at a surface of the sealing resin between the discharge portion and each of the first terminal and the second terminal. Therefore, the combination of the features of Claims 1 and 2 is considered allowable. Claims 3-11 incorporate all of the limitations of Claim 2. Therefore, they are also allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding Claim 15, the prior art does not teach or render obvious wherein the conductive member further includes a third die pad spaced apart from the first die pad and the second die pad and on which the insulating element is mounted. Therefore, the combination of the features of Claims 1, 12, 13, and 15 is considered allowable. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Osada et al, US 2015/0137314, discloses a semiconductor device having an insulating element, a first terminal, a second terminal, and a sealing resin. Kikuchi, US 2021/0265310, discloses a semiconductor device having an insulating element, a first terminal, a second terminal, and a sealing resin. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Rose Keagy whose telephone number is (571) 270-3455. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. 8am-5pm (CT). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeff Natalini can be reached at (571) 272-2266. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /R.K./Examiner, Art Unit 2818 /JEFF W NATALINI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2818
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 10, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745499
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURES AND MANUFACTURING METHODS THEREOF
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745388
SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING THEREOF
1y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733359
LIGHT EMITTING DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727296
CIRCUIT SUBSTRATE AND MOUNTED SUBSTRATE
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12720821
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+10.7%)
3y 2m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 44 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month