Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026
Application No. 18/769,471

ACTIVE HUMAN MILK OLIGOSACCHARIDE PREPARATION WITH ALLERGY-ALLEVIATING FUNCTION, AND USE THEREOF

Non-Final OA §101§102
Filed
Jul 11, 2024
Priority
Jul 27, 2023 — CN 202310930472.6
Examiner
BERRY, LAYLA D
Art Unit
1693
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Zhejiang Gongshang University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
963 granted / 1458 resolved
+6.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
59 currently pending
Career history
1506
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
34.1%
-5.9% vs TC avg
§102
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
§112
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1458 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . FOREIGN APPLICATIONS CHINA 202310930472.6 07/27/2023 Applicant's election with traverse of Group III, claims 1-3, in the reply filed on September 10, 2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the examiner has not demonstrated a serious search and/or examination burden. This is not found persuasive because the inventions are classified separately, showing that each invention has attained recognition in the art as a separate subject for inventive effort, and also a separate field of search. MPEP 808.02. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 4-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on September 10, 2026. Applicant is reminded that when an elected product claim is found allowable, withdrawn claims that include all the limitations of the allowable product claim will be considered for rejoinder. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to a product of nature without significantly more. The claim(s) recite(s) a preparation comprising LNFP-1 and/or 2’-FL, or the combination of LNFP-1 and 2’-FL, or the combination wherein the ratio of LNFP-1 and 2’-FL is 1: (1-3). Human milk contains LNFP-1 and 2’-FL in a ratio of 1: (1-3), as evidenced by Wang (J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 6328-6353). See Table 1, which explains that 2’-FL has 20.50% abundance in human milk and LNFP-I has 7.50% abundance in human milk, for a ratio of about 2.7. Table 3 explains that 2’-FL in human milk reduces allergy, so the functional limitation “with an allergy-alleviating function” is also present in the natural product. This judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application because the claims are drawn to the product itself and not an application of it. The claim(s) does/do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception because no additional elements are recited besides the product of nature. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wang (J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 6328-6353). Wang teaches that 2’-FL and LNFP-I are present in human milk. See Table 1, which explains that 2’-FL has 20.50% abundance in human milk and LNFP-I has 7.50% abundance in human milk, for a ratio of about 2.7. Table 3 explains that 2’-FL in human milk reduces allergy, so the functional limitation “with an allergy-alleviating function” is present in the product. Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jennewen (WO 2019/110800 A1). Jennewen teaches an infant formula which contains 2.5 g/L of 2’-FL and 1.0 g/L of LNFPI, which is a ratio of 2.5. Page 21, Table 6. Jennewen also teaches that HMOs reduce the risk of developing allergies. Page 3, lines 1-10. Jennewen’s composition inherently has an allergy-alleviating function because the current specification exemplifies a concentration of 2.5 mg/ml 2’-FL and Jennewen’s composition meets the exemplified concentration. It is noted that the current specification does not define an effective amount or concentration of compounds for allergy-alleviating function. Conclusion No claims are allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LAYLA D BERRY whose telephone number is (571)272-9572. The examiner can normally be reached 7:00-3:00 CST, M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Scarlett Goon can be reached at 571-270-5241. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LAYLA D BERRY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1693
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 11, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12765551
ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOSITION COMPRISING A MODIFIED ALKYL GLYCOSIDE AND AN ALKANEDIOL
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12766159
GLYCYRRHIZIN-BRANCHED POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL CONJUGATE FOR TREATING CANCER
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12746249
A Method for Drying Human Milk Oligosaccharides
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747242
PROCESS FOR THE CATALYTIC GLYCOSYLATION OF ARENES
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746198
AQUEOUS PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING SGLT-2 INHIBITORS
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (+9.0%)
2y 9m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1458 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month