Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/769,486

SYSTEM AND METHOD OF OPERATING PERCEPTION DEVICES IN MOBILE MACHINES

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jul 11, 2024
Examiner
ANWARI, MACEEH
Art Unit
3663
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Caterpillar Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
659 granted / 813 resolved
+29.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
851
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
§103
40.2%
+0.2% vs TC avg
§102
27.3%
-12.7% vs TC avg
§112
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 813 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This action is in response to communications filed on 11/26/2025. Claims 1, 8 & 15 have been amended. Claim 6 has been canceled and claim 21 has been newly added. No other claims have been amended, added, or canceled. Accordingly, claims 1-5 & 7-21 are pending. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 11/26/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant's representative argues, in substance, that CN116430316 ("316") does not teach and/or disclose: (A) tilt the radar device such that a titling angle of the radar device is one of a plurality of discrete angles each corresponding to one of the predefined speed ranges. In response to (A) examiner respectfully disagrees. Examiner contends that applicant's representative employs broad language and as such the examiner reserves the right to interpret the claims broadly. Initially the examiner would like to point out that the term corresponding, simply, means comparable and/or 'according to'. The examiner contends that 316's disclosure of an ACC radar adjusting method and system of detecting the pitching angle according to the vehicle speed (as disclosed directly in the Abstract); along with the ACC radar pitching angle being adjusted according to the self-vehicle pitching angle and the vehicle speed, among other factors (see Description at least pg. 6) reads on the instantly contested limitation. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5 & 7- 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by CN116430316A (hereinafter 316). 316 discloses: 1: A system for operating a radar device of a mobile machine, the system comprising: an actuator operably coupled between the radar device and an exterior of the mobile machine (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1; vehicle with radar, automatically adjusting the angle of the radar, pitch adjustment mechanism); and a controller configured to: receive an input indicative of a ground speed of the mobile machine (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3; detecting the vehicle speed); and control, based on the input, the actuator to tilt the radar device with respect to a ground plane to alter a field of view of the radar device, wherein the ground speed is within a speed range of a plurality of predefined speed ranges, and a tilting angle of the radar device is one of a plurality of discrete angles each corresponding to one of the predefined speed ranges (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3; vehicle with radar, automatically adjusting the angle of the radar based on road surface type/angle—uphill, ramp etc.). 2: wherein the field of view is a vertical field of view spanning between a first field extent and a second field extent to define a vertical viewing angle in a vertical plane extending along a length of the mobile machine (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3; vehicle with radar and automatically adjusting the angle of the radar based on road surface). 3: wherein the input includes a first signal indicative of an initial ground speed of the mobile machine and a second signal indicative of a current ground speed of the mobile machine, and wherein, if the initial ground speed is less than a predefined low-speed threshold and the current ground speed is greater than a predefined high-speed threshold, controlling the actuator to tilt the radar device includes tilting the radar device upward with respect to the ground plane (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3; vehicle with radar and automatically adjusting the angle of the radar based on road surface and vehicle speed). 4: if the initial ground speed is greater than the predefined high-speed threshold and the current ground speed is less than the predefined low-speed threshold, controlling the actuator to tilt the radar device includes tilting the radar device downward with respect to the ground plane (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3; vehicle with radar and automatically adjusting the angle of the radar based on road surface and vehicle speed). 5: further including a spring extending from a mount of the radar device to a body of the radar device, wherein the spring is configured to bias the radar device towards a default tilt corresponding to a stationary state of the mobile machine relative to the ground plane (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3; vehicle with radar and automatically adjusting the angle of the radar based on road surface and vehicle speed). 6: wherein the actuator is an electronic actuator (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3; vehicle with radar and automatically adjusting the angle of the radar, pitch adjustment mechanism). 7: wherein tilting the radar device upward with respect to the ground plane prevents the field of view of the radar device from intersecting the ground plane (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3; vehicle with radar and automatically adjusting the angle of the radar, pitch adjustment mechanism adjusting relative to slope of road and field of view of radar/vehicle). 8: A mobile machine, comprising: an exterior; a perception device having a field of view; and a system for operating the perception device of the mobile machine, the system including: an actuator operably coupled between the perception device and the exterior; and a controller configured to: receive an input indicative of a ground speed of the mobile machine; and control, based on the input, the actuator to tilt the perception device with respect to a ground plane to alter the field of view of the perception device, wherein the ground speed is within a speed range of a plurality of predefined speed ranges, and a tilting angle of the perception device is one of a plurality of discrete angles each corresponding to one of the predefined speed ranges (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3; see claim 1). 9: wherein the field of view is a vertical field of view spanning between a first field extent and a second field extent to define a vertical viewing angle in a vertical plane extending along a length of the mobile machine (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3; see claim 2). 10: wherein the input includes a first signal indicative of an initial ground speed of the mobile machine and a second signal indicative of a current ground speed of the mobile machine, and wherein, if the initial ground speed is less than a predefined low-speed threshold and the current ground speed is greater than a predefined high-speed threshold, controlling the actuator to tilt the perception device includes tilting the perception device upward with respect to the ground plane to prevent the field of view of the perception device from intersecting the ground plane (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3; see claim 3). 11: wherein if the initial ground speed is greater than the predefined high-speed threshold and the current ground speed is less than the predefined low-speed threshold, controlling the actuator to tilt the perception device includes tilting the perception device downward with respect to the ground plane (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3; see claim 4). 12: wherein the system further includes a spring extending from a mount of the perception device to a body of the perception device, wherein the spring is configured to bias the perception device towards a default tilt corresponding to a stationary state of the mobile machine relative to the ground plane (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3; see claim 5). 13: wherein the actuator is an electronic actuator (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3; see claim 6). 14: wherein the perception device includes a radar device (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3; see claim 1). 15: A method of operating a perception device of a mobile machine, the method comprising; receiving, by a controller, an input indicative of a ground speed of the mobile machine; and controlling, by the controller, an actuator operably coupled between the perception device and an exterior of the mobile machine, based on the input, to tilt the perception device with respect to a ground plane to alter a field of view of the perception device, wherein the ground speed is within a speed range of a plurality of predefined speed ranges, and a tilting angle of the perception device is one of a plurality of discrete angles each corresponding to one of the predefined speed ranges (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3; see claim 1). 16: wherein the field of view is a vertical field of view spanning between a first field extent and a second field extent to define a vertical viewing angle in a vertical plane extending along a length of the mobile machine (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3; see claim 2). 17: wherein the input includes a first signal indicative of an initial ground speed of the mobile machine and a second signal indicative of a current ground speed of the mobile machine, wherein controlling the actuator based on the input includes: actuating, if the initial ground speed is less than a predefined low-speed threshold and the current ground speed is greater than a predefined high-speed threshold, the actuator in a manner to tilt the perception device upward with respect to the ground plane to prevent the field of view of the perception device from intersecting the ground plane (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3; see claim 3). 18: wherein controlling the actuator based on the input includes: actuating, if the initial ground speed is greater than the predefined high-speed threshold and the current ground speed is less than the predefined low-speed threshold, the actuator in a manner to tilt the perception device downward with respect to the ground plane (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3; see claim 4). 19: wherein the actuator is an electronic actuator (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3; see claim 6). 20: wherein the perception device includes a radar device (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3; see claim 1). 21: wherein the tilting angle is proportional to the ground speed (see 316 at least fig. 1- 6 and in particular fig. 1-3 and Description; ACC radar adjusting method and system of detecting the pitching angle according to the vehicle speed). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MACEEH ANWARI whose telephone number is 571-272-7591. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 7:30-5:00 PM ES. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Angela Ortiz can be reached on 571-272-1206. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MACEEH ANWARI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3663
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 11, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Nov 20, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 20, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 26, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 08, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595638
MACHINE THAT MOVES LEVER, AND COMPUTER CONNECTED TO MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583325
ELECTRIC VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12565265
VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE, VEHICLE CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12533924
VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12163799
RECREATIONAL VEHICLE INTERACTIVE TELEMETRY, MAPPING, AND TRIP PLANNING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 10, 2024
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+5.1%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 813 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month