Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/771,229

Methods and Systems of Photo-Electrochemical PFAS Destruction

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 12, 2024
Examiner
ORME, PATRICK JAMES
Art Unit
1779
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Claros Technologies INC.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
2-3
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
67%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allow Rate
280 granted / 474 resolved
-5.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
494
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
38.6%
-1.4% vs TC avg
§102
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
§112
35.7%
-4.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 474 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 9 and 11-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The term ““high surface area construction” in claims 9 and 13 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term ““high surface area construction” is not defined by the claims, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. The scope of the claims is unclear making the claims indefinite. Claims 11-12 recites the limitation " the photoelectric reactor vessel " in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3, 6-8, 10, 14-16, and 27-30 are allowed. Claims 9 and 11-13 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art does not disclose not fairly suggest a UV light source comprising a UV lamp within a quartz tube that is submerged in the photoreactor vessel and the quartz tube is located approximately 2 cm or less distance from the cathode, as per claim 1; a UV light source within a tube in the photoreactor vessel, the UV light source configured to direct UV light onto the aqueous solution including PFAS in the photoreactor vessel; a cathode within the photoreactor vessel and configured to contact the aqueous solution containing PFAS within the photoreactor vessel, located approximately 2 cm or less from the UV light source, wherein cathode comprises of a high surface area construction having an electrochemically active surface and a geometric surface area, wherein the electrochemically active surface area is greater than the geometric surface area, as per claim 13. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CAMERON J ALLEN whose telephone number is (571)270-3164. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 6 am till 3 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Walter Griffin can be reached on 5712721447. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CAMERON J ALLEN/Examiner, Art Unit 1774
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 12, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 21, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Nov 15, 2024
Response Filed
Jan 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Apr 11, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 21, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
May 02, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599852
FILTRATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594526
FORWARD OSMOSIS FILTRATION CELL, AND METHODS OF FILTERING WATER WITH A FORWARD OSMOSIS FILTRATION CELL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12582943
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GROUNDWATER TREATMENT FOR NON-POTABLE USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577131
TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURE DIFFERENCE INFERENCE DEVICE AND DIFFUSED AIR AMOUNT CONTROL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569609
TEMPERATURE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR PATIENTS DURING STATIONARY AND MOBILE ECLS/ECMO THERAPY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
67%
With Interview (+7.5%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 474 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month