Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Claros Technologies Inc.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

5 pending office actions • 2 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Claros Technologies Inc. holds a company patent portfolio with 4 pending office actions. These actions are situated within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The portfolio involves 2 distinct art units and 4 distinct examiners.

The busiest examiner, DRODGE, JOSEPH W, is currently managing 1 pending office action. Since the busiest examiner only has 1 pending office action, it follows that all 4 pending office actions are distributed among 4 different distinct examiners. This indicates that every active matter for the company is being reviewed by a unique individual.

For practitioners, the involvement of 4 distinct examiners across 4 pending office actions means that no two cases share the same examiner. The 2 distinct art units involved suggest that the Chemistry & Materials technology being patented is spread across different technical groups. Managing these 4 pending office actions requires a separate strategy for each application, as there is no examiner-level overlap to leverage across the current portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
1
Medium (20%)
1
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (20%)
§112 only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (60%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
80% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DRODGE, JOSEPH W 1 78.2% +38.2%
GONZALEZ, MADELINE 1 72.6% +15.7%
SINGH-PANDEY, ARTI R 1 70.6% +8.9%
MCGANN, BERNADETTE KAREN 1 64.6% +20.3%
SIMKINS, SLONE ELIZABETH 1 54.3% +50.0%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19395548 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR CONTINUOUS PFAS DESTRUCTION GONZALEZ, MADELINE —
18911156 UV Resistant Fabrics and Treatment Methods SINGH-PANDEY, ARTI R —
18212603 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR THE DESTRUCTION AND DEFLUORINATION OF PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS), FLUOROTELOMERS AND OTHER PERSISITENT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS SIMKINS, SLONE ELIZABETH —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18771183 Methods and Systems of Oxidative Pretreatment of Aqueous Solutions Containing PFAS MCGANN, BERNADETTE KAREN 22d overdue
19398636 Methods and Systems of Iodine Capture from Aqueous Solutions DRODGE, JOSEPH W —
19395548 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR CONTINUOUS PFAS DESTRUCTION GONZALEZ, MADELINE —
18212603 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR THE DESTRUCTION AND DEFLUORINATION OF PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS), FLUOROTELOMERS AND OTHER PERSISITENT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS SIMKINS, SLONE ELIZABETH —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1773 3
1735 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19398636 Methods and Systems of Iodine Capture from Aqueous Solutions DRODGE, JOSEPH W 1773 §112Other Final Rejection — Pending Nov 24, 2025
19395548 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR CONTINUOUS PFAS DESTRUCTION GONZALEZ, MADELINE 1773 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 20, 2025
18911156 UV Resistant Fabrics and Treatment Methods SINGH-PANDEY, ARTI R — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 09, 2024
18771183 Methods and Systems of Oxidative Pretreatment of Aqueous Solutions Containing PFAS MCGANN, BERNADETTE KAREN 1773 §103 Non-Final OA 22d overdue Pending Jul 12, 2024
18212603 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR THE DESTRUCTION AND DEFLUORINATION OF PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS), FLUOROTELOMERS AND OTHER PERSISITENT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS SIMKINS, SLONE ELIZABETH 1735 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 20, 2023

Managing Claros Technologies Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month