Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/774,042

Dual Purpose Millimeter Wave Frequency Band Transmitter

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jul 16, 2024
Priority
Sep 29, 2017 — continuation of 10/871,559 +2 more
Examiner
ARMAND, MARC ANTHONY
Art Unit
3646
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
889 granted / 1067 resolved
+31.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1093
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§103
58.5%
+18.5% vs TC avg
§102
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
§112
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1067 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 21-40 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-17 of U.S. Patent No.12,044,774. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because regarding claim 21, U.S. Patent No.12,044,774 discloses a system comprising: a transmitter comprising circuitry configured to: generate a map of an environment of the transmitter based at least in part on reflections of radio frequency (RF) signals transmitted into the environment; and transmit data to a receiver using a wireless transmission configuration selected based on the map. Regarding claims 22-27, U.S. Patent No.12,044,774 discloses in claims 2-6, a system wherein the wireless transmission configuration includes at least one of an antenna sector or a beam; wherein the transmitter is further configured to perform a beamforming procedure that omits a sector responsive to the map indicating that an obstacle would interfere with transmission via the sector; wherein the data includes video data; wherein the system is further configured to render at least a portion of a first video frame based on the map of the environment and cause the transmitter to transmit the first video frame to the receiver; wherein, during rendering of the first video frame, the system is configured to access spatial location information of one or more physical objects in the environment, the spatial location information being generated based at least in part on the reflections of the RF signals; wherein the spatial location information is based on a combination of first mapping information obtained using the transmitter and second mapping information obtained using the receiver. Regarding claim 28, U.S. Patent No.12,044,774 discloses in claim 7, a method comprising: generating, by circuitry of a transmitter, a map of an environment of the transmitter based at least in part on reflections of radio frequency (RF) signals transmitted into the environment; and transmitting, by the transmitter, data to a receiver using a wireless transmission configuration selected based on the map. Regarding claims 29-34, U.S. Patent No.12,044,774 discloses in claims 8-12, a method as recited in claim 28, wherein the wireless transmission configuration includes at least one of an antenna sector or a beam; further comprising performing a beamforming procedure that omits a sector responsive to the map indicating that an obstacle would interfere with transmission via the sector; wherein the data includes video data; further comprising rendering at least a portion of a first video frame based on the map of the environment and transmitting the first video frame to the receiver; wherein rendering the first video frame comprises accessing spatial location information of one or more physical objects in the environment; wherein the spatial location information is based on a combination of first mapping information obtained using the transmitter and second mapping information obtained using the receiver. Regarding claim 35, U.S. Patent No.12,044,774 discloses in claim 13, a system comprising: processing circuitry; and a transmitter coupled to the processing circuitry; wherein the system is configured to: generate a map of an environment of the system based at least in part on reflections of radio frequency (RF) signals transmitted into the environment; and cause the transmitter to transmit data to a receiver using a wireless transmission configuration selected based on the map. Regarding claims 36-40, U.S. Patent No.12,044,774 discloses in claims 14-17, a system wherein the wireless transmission configuration includes at least one of an antenna sector or a beam; wherein the system is configured to perform a beamforming procedure that omits a sector responsive to the map indicating that an obstacle would interfere with transmission via the sector; wherein the data includes video data; wherein the processing circuitry is configured to render at least a portion of a first video frame based on the map of the environment, and wherein the transmitter is configured to transmit the first video frame to the receiver; wherein, during rendering of the first video frame, the processing circuitry is configured to access spatial location information of one or more physical objects in the environment. Prior arts Claims 21-40 are anticipated by Mallinson US 2018/0095542. Mallinson shows and discloses in FIG.1-9, the limitations of claims 21-40. Malllinson shows in fig.1-9, a system comprising: a receiver (104) [0044]; and a transmitter (108, 110) configured to generate a map of an environment (0006, 0007, 0062) of the transmitter (110), based at least in part on reflections of RF signals [0070]; and send video data based on the map [0063,0068] to a receiver (104). Malllinson shows in fig.1-9, a method comprising generating a map of an environment [0058] of a transmitter (110 transmit the signal), based at least in part on reflections of RF signals; and sending video data based on the map to a receiver (104) [0058, 0076, 0077]. Malllinson shows in fig.1-9, an apparatus comprising: a processor (108 comprises a processor)[0078]; a memory [0095]; and a radio frequency (RF) transceiver module (110); wherein the apparatus is configured to generate a map of an environment [0090] based at least in part on reflection of RF signals; while sending video data bases on the map to a receiver; wherein the apparatus is configured to: transmit radio frequency (RF) signals scanned across the environment; receive reflections of the RF signals [0090]; generate reflection data based on the reflected RF signals; and process the reflection data to generate the map of the environment [0090]; wherein the apparatus is configured to: determine an optimal antenna sector from the map of the environment; and send video data to the receiver via the optimal antenna sector. Frizzell US 2018/0067204 discloses (0067) a device with frequencies with wavelengths between 1 and 30 millimeters. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARC-ANTHONY ARMAND whose telephone number is (571)272-5178. The examiner can normally be reached 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven B Gauthier can be reached at 571-270-0373. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MARC - ANTHONY ARMAND Primary Examiner Art Unit 2813 /MARC-ANTHONY ARMAND/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2813
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707998
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707662
IGBT MODULE, MOTOR CONTROLLER, AND VEHICLE
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12696767
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12688946
ELECTRONIC COMPONENT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING AN ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12690498
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+4.1%)
2y 5m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1067 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month